BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Radiol. Jun 28, 2026; 18(6): 119110
Published online Jun 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.119110
Venous excess doppler ultrasound: What radiologists should know in 2026
Chail Shah, Deepak Shah, Abhilash Koratala
Chail Shah, Neurocritical Care, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, United States
Deepak Shah, Radiology, Dr RM Shah Memorial Center, Mumbai 400050, Maharashtra, India
Abhilash Koratala, Division of Nephrology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, United States
Author contributions: Shah C conceived the manuscript, performed literature review, and drafted the initial manuscript; Shah D contributed radiology expertise and critically revised the manuscript; Koratala A supervised the project, contributed to conceptual development, and provided critical revisions for important intellectual content. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
AI contribution statement: ChatGPT was used only for minor language editing to improve clarity and readability. It was not used for data analysis, content generation, or interpretation. The manuscript was written by the authors. AI tools did not generate any portion of the scientific content or references. All study design, literature search, and conclusions were developed solely by the authors. Images obtained from external sources have been appropriately credited. AI-assisted tools were used for language refinement and improvement of clarity/grammar in portions of the answering reviewers document. All scientific content, interpretations, manuscript revisions, and responses to reviewer comments were generated, reviewed, and verified by the authors.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Corresponding author: Abhilash Koratala, Associate Professor, Senior Researcher, Division of Nephrology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 West Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI 53226, United States. akoratala@mcw.edu
Received: January 20, 2026
Revised: March 4, 2026
Accepted: May 12, 2026
Published online: June 28, 2026
Processing time: 157 Days and 4.6 Hours
Abstract

Systemic venous congestion is increasingly recognized as a key contributor to organ dysfunction and adverse outcomes, particularly in the cardiorenal and critical care settings. Elevated right-sided cardiac pressures are transmitted retrogradely to the hepatic, splanchnic, and renal venous systems, leading to impaired organ perfusion, increased interstitial pressure, and complications such as acute kidney injury. Conventional clinical markers and biomarkers of congestion lack sensitivity for detecting early or subclinical venous hypertension. In contrast, ultrasound, particularly when incorporating abdominal venous Doppler assessment, enables a more granular, physiologically grounded evaluation of congestion. The venous excess ultrasound (VExUS) score integrates inferior vena cava assessment with hepatic, portal, and intrarenal venous Doppler waveforms to provide a structured framework for grading venous congestion. VExUS has been associated with renal outcomes, and morbidity and mortality in heart failure, and dynamic changes in venous Doppler patterns appear to carry prognostic significance. This review describes the physiologic basis of venous Doppler abnormalities, outlines the components and grading of the VExUS system, and highlights common technical and interpretive pitfalls that affect reliable assessment. Particular emphasis is placed on waveform morphology, electrocardiographic correlation, and optimization of Doppler acquisition. Given that abdominal Doppler studies are frequently performed for indications unrelated to heart failure, radiologists are uniquely positioned to recognize venous congestion on routine imaging. Incorporation of VExUS principles into radiologic reporting, along with standardized acquisition and multidisciplinary education, may enhance the clinical relevance of abdominal and renal vascular examinations and support earlier, physiologically informed hemodynamic intervention. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence, discusses technical and interpretive considerations, and provides practical guidance for radiologists incorporating VExUS into practice.

Keywords: Point-of-care ultrasound; Ultrasound; Venous excess ultrasound; Congestion; Radiology

Core Tip: Venous congestion is a dynamic and underrecognized potential contributor to organ dysfunction across cardiovascular and critical care settings. The venous excess ultrasound framework integrates abdominal venous Doppler findings to provide a structured, noninvasive assessment of venous hypertension. Radiologists can play an important role by recognizing signs of congestion on routine imaging, helping educate physicians who are learning point-of-care ultrasound on optimal Doppler acquisition, and incorporating venous excess ultrasound principles into their interpretive reporting.

Write to the Help Desk