BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Cardiol. Feb 26, 2026; 18(2): 116172
Published online Feb 26, 2026. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v18.i2.116172
Table 1 Study characteristics and participant demographics
Ref.
Country
Study design
Sample size
Age range
Sex distribution
Comorbidities
MI classification
Krittanawong et al[18], 2020United StatesRetrospective cohort (NIS)5764755 (< 55 years), 1149185 AMI< 55 (mean 45.1 AMI)66.6% men, 33.4% women (AMI)Obesity, smoking, HTN, diabetes, HIV, SLE, OSA, RASTEMI, NSTEMI
Zhu et al[19], 2024United StatesProspective cohort (VIRGO)297918-55 (median 48)67.2% women, 32.8% menHTN, diabetes, obesity, smoking, alcohol abuse, prior CVD, COPDSTEMI, NSTEMI, EF < 40%
Dreyer et al[20], 2021United StatesProspective cohort (VIRGO)297918-55 (mean 47.1)67.4% women, 32.6% menHTN, diabetes, obesity, smoking, prior AMI, COPDSTEMI, NSTEMI
Gupta et al[21], 2020IndiaCase-control154 (77 MI, 77 controls)18-45 (mean 35.3 MI)65 men/12 women (MI), 58 men/19 women (controls)Excluded smokers, diabetics, BMI > 35AWMI, IWMI, LWMI
Cho et al[22], 2019South KoreaPopulation-based cohort270509020 + (stratified)Not split, large populationHTN, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, SES, depressionAMI (ICD-10)
Fan et al[23], 2019ChinaProspective cohort80418-85 (mean 57.5)82.6% menHTN, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, prior MI/PCI, smokingACS (STEMI/NSTEMI/UA)
Smolderen et al[24], 2015United States, Spain, AustraliaCohort (VIRGO)357218-55 (median 48)67.1% women, 32.9% menHTN, diabetes, obesity, smoking, hypercholesterolemia, prior AMI, CHFSTEMI, NSTEMI
Turati et al[25], 2015ItalyCase-control760 cases, 682 controls19-79 (median 61 MI)76.3% men (MI)HTN, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, BMINon-fatal AMI
Orth-Gomér et al[26], 1986SwedenCase-control210 (89 MI, 121 controls)18-45 (mean 39.5)89 men (MI), 121 men (controls)HTN, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, smokingMI (survivors < 45)
Zhao et al[27], 2023ChinaCross-sectional810318-99 (mean 50.3)53.5% women, 46.5% menHTN, diabetes, obesityNot MI-specific
Head et al[28], 2019United StatesCross-sectional autopsy (PDAY)265115-34 (mean 24.8)75% men, 25% womenExcluded major comorbiditiesSubclinical atherosclerosis
Lu et al[29], 2022United StatesCase-control (VIRGO/NHANES)2264 AMI, 2264 controls18-55 (median 48)68.9% women, 31.1% menHTN, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, obesity, depression, low income, family historySTEMI, NSTEMI, type 1
Jariwala et al[30], 2022IndiaRetrospective, multicenter3656 (< 45 years PCI)< 45 (mean men 37.4, women 41.1)69.2% men, 30.8% womenHTN, diabetes, overweight, dyslipidemia, family history, smoking, alcoholismACS (STEMI/NSTEMI/UA)
Table 2 Exposure details and outcomes
Study ID
Non-traditional risk factors assessed
Measurement methods
Outcome measures
Effect estimates (OR/HR/RR with 95%CI)
Covariates adjusted for
1HIV, SLE, OSA, RAICD-9 codes (NIS)AMI riskHIV: OR = 4.06 (3.48-4.71); SLE: OR = 2.12 (1.89-2.39); OSA: OR = 1.16 (1.12-1.20); RA: OR = 0.83 (0.76-0.89)Age, sex, race, BMI, DM, HTN, HLD, CKD, smoking
2Marital/partner status, depression, social support, stressStructured interview, PHQ-9, Social Support Inventory, Perceived Stress Scale1-year all-cause readmissionHR = 1.31 (1.15-1.49) unpartnered vs partnered; adjusted HRs for demo/SES/clinical/psychosocialAge, sex, race, SES, clinical, psychosocial
3Depression, social support, stress, SESPHQ-9, Social Support Inventory, PSS, SES data1-year all-cause readmissionHR = 1.28 (1.15-1.42) unpartnered vs partnered; adjusted HRsAge, sex, race, MI severity, comorbidities, psychosocial
4Telomere length (biological aging)qPCR for telomere lengthTelomere length in MI vs controlsMean T/S ratio MI 0.115 vs controls 0.792 (P < 0.0001); shorter in MIAge, gender, BMI
5Socioeconomic status, depressionInsurance premium, ICD-10 codesAMI incidenceHR low SES vs high 1.16 (1.14-1.19); HR depression vs none 126 (1.21-1.31)Age, sex, comorbidities
6OSAPolygraphy (AHI ≥15)MACCE, unstable anginaHR = 1.55 (0.94-2.57) MACCE; HR = 3.87 (1.20-12.46) MACCE after 1 yearsAge, sex, BMI, HTN, diabetes, prior MI/PCI
7Depression, psychosocial stressPHQ-9, PSS, interviewPrevalence of depressive symptoms at AMIWomen: 39% PHQ-9 ≥ 10, men: 22%; adjusted OR for women 1.64 (1.36-1.98)Age, sex, SES, comorbidities
8Mediterranean diet adherenceFood Frequency Questionnaire, MDSNon-fatal AMIMDS ≥ 6: OR = 0.55 (0.40-0.75); per point: OR = 0.91 (0.85-0.98)Age, sex, BMI, HTN, diabetes
9Type A behavior, psychosocial work, educationJenkins Activity Survey, work environment surveyMI risk, variance explainedWork monotony/poor discretion 5% variance; type A 2%; education NSAge, sex, education
10Sleep durationSelf-report, AHA CVH scoreIdeal CVH, BP, glucose, cholesterol≤ 6 hours sleep: OR = 1.38 (1.15-1.67) for non-ideal CVHAge, sex, BMI, comorbidities
11Unexplained (likely non-traditional) riskAutopsy, lesion quantificationSubclinical atherosclerosisOR high-growth group per year age: 1.125 (1.063-1.190)Age, cholesterol, BMI, HbA1c, CRP
12Depression, low income, family historyPHQ-9, interview, lab, SESFirst AMI, PAFsWomen: Depression OR = 3.09 (2.37-4.04); low income OR = 1.79 (1.28-2.50)Age, sex, SES, comorbidities
Men: Depression OR = 1.77 (1.15-2.73)
13Hypothyroidism, CTD, RHD, takayasu, SCAD, OCP useMedical record, interview, labsPrevalence, in-hospital outcomesNon-traditional RFs rare; no adjusted effect estimates; in-hospital mortality 1.77%-2%Age, sex
Table 3 Summary table of evidence strength
Risk factor category
Number of studies
Direction of association
Effect estimates (range)
Strength of evidence
Depression/psychosocial5Positive (risk ↑)OR = 1.64-3.09, HR = 1.28-1.31Strong
Low socioeconomic status3Positive (risk ↑)HR = 1.16-1.47Moderate
Autoimmune (HIV, SLE)2Strong positive (risk ↑)OR = 2.12-4.06Strong
Rheumatoid arthritis1Negative (risk ↓)OR = 0.83Emerging
Telomere length1Positive (risk ↑, shorter TL)T/S ratio 0.115 vs 0.792Emerging
Obstructive sleep apnea1Positive (risk ↑)HR = 1.55-3.87Moderate
Mediterranean diet1Negative (risk ↓)OR = 0.55Moderate
Short sleep duration1Positive (risk ↑) (CV health)OR = 1.38Emerging
Occupational stress1Positive (risk ↑)5% variance explainedEmerging
Table 4 Subgroup and sensitivity analyses
Study ID
Subgroup (e.g., sex, age, region)
Effect estimates (OR/HR/RR with 95%CI)
Notes
1Age (< 40 vs 40-55), sexHIV: OR = 4.06 (3.48-4.71); SLE: OR = 2.12 (1.89-2.39); OSA: OR = 1.16 (1.12-1.20) for MI risk in young adultsNo stratified data < 40; large administrative database; cross-sectional analysis of hospitalizations
2Sex (women vs men), marital status (unpartnered vs partnered)HR = 1.31 (1.15-1.49) unpartnered vs partnered for 1-year readmission; unpartnered women: 37.6% readmission vs unpartnered men: 26.8%No significant sex-marital status interaction (P = 0.69); effect attenuated after psychosocial adjustment
3Sex, marital statusHR = 1.28 (1.15-1.42) unpartnered vs partnered for 1-year readmission; unpartnered women had highest readmissionSignificant sex-marital status interaction; psychosocial factors partially mediate risk
4Age group (18-30 vs 31-45), sexTelomere length shorter in MI patients aged 31-45 vs controls (P < 0.05); females with MI had shorter telomeres than female controls (P < 0.01)No longitudinal MI risk data; small sample; case-control design
5SES and depression combinedHR = 1.47 (1.36-1.60) for low SES + depression vs high SES, no depression (AMI risk)Large population; no stratification < 40; depression by ICD codes; median 11.6 years follow-up
6Time (≤ 1 year vs > 1 year), OSA statusHR for MACCE after 1 year in OSA: 3.87 (1.20-12.46); overall HR = 1.55 (0.94-2.57) for OSA vs non-OSAMean age 575; not exclusive to young adults; median 1-year follow-up
7Sex (women vs men)Adjusted OR for depressive symptoms at AMI: 1.64 (1.36-1.98) women vs menData collected at AMI admission only; no MI risk prediction; age up to 55; no follow-up
8BMI (< 25 vs ≥ 25), hypertension statusStronger inverse association of mediterranean diet with AMI in BMI < 25 and normotensive individualsCase-control; median age 61; not restricted to young adults; no follow-up
9Education level, sexMen with high education had higher type A and work strain; women with low education had more type A behaviorSmall sample; only men in main analysis; older data; case-control; no follow-up
10Sleep duration categories (≤ 6 hours, 7 hours, 8 hours, ≥ 9 hours)OR = 1.38 (1.15-1.67) for short sleep (≤ 6 hours) and non-ideal CVHCross-sectional; broad age range; outcome is CV health, not MI; no follow-up
11Age (per year increase), high-risk subgroup vs low-riskOR = 1.125 (1.063-1.190) per year age for high-growth atherosclerosis groupCross-sectional autopsy study; subclinical outcome; no direct MI data; no follow-up
12Sex, AMI subtype (type 1 vs others)Women: Depression OR = 3.09 (2.37-4.04), men OR = 1.77 (1.15-2.73); family history stronger in menCase-control; age 18-55; no exclusive < 40 data; robust adjustment; no follow-up
13SexNon-traditional RFs rare (e.g., hypothyroidism, CTD, SCAD); no significant sex differencesRetrospective; in-hospital outcomes only; no effect estimates for non-traditional RFs; no follow-up
Table 5 Risk of bias assessment
Study ID
Study design
Quality tool
Score
Quality classification
Key limitations
1CohortNOS7HighAdministrative data, coding errors
2CohortNOS7HighResidual confounding, observational design
3CohortNOS6ModerateRetrospective data, potential selection bias
4Case-controlNOS5ModerateSmall sample size, cross-sectional design
5CohortNOS8HighLimited exposure detail
6CohortNOS7HighShort follow-up, single center
7CohortNOS7HighPotential residual confounding
8Case-controlNOS6ModerateRecall bias, dietary assessment
9Case-controlNOS5ModerateSmall sample, self-reported exposures
10Cross-sectionalAHRQ7ModerateSelf-report, cross-sectional design
11Cross-sectionalAHRQ6ModerateSurrogate outcome, autopsy data
12Case-controlNOS7HighPotential selection bias
13CohortNOS5ModerateRetrospective design, limited non-traditional risk data