Copyright
©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Cardiol. Feb 26, 2026; 18(2): 110803
Published online Feb 26, 2026. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v18.i2.110803
Published online Feb 26, 2026. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v18.i2.110803
Table 1 Clinical characteristics of included patients stratified according to the presence of atrial fibrillation, mean ± SD/n (%)/median (interquartile range)
| Variable | Whole cohort (n = 138) | Non-atrial fibrillation (n = 107) | Atrial fibrillation (n = 31) | P value |
| Age | 82 ± 6 | 82 ± 6 | 82 ± 6 | 0.77 |
| Male gender | 30 (22) | 26 (24) | 4 (13) | 0.18 |
| Body surface area | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 0.64 |
| Diabetes | 37 (27) | 25 (23) | 12 (39) | 0.089 |
| Smoker | 10 (7) | 10 (9) | 0 (0) | 0.077 |
| Hemoglobin | 121 ± 17 | 121 ± 17 | 121 ± 18 | 0.72 |
| Previous MI | 14 (10) | 10 (9) | 4 (13) | 0.56 |
| Chronic lung disease | 36 (26) | 27 (25) | 9 (29) | 0.67 |
| Previous CVA/TIA | 20 (15) | 14 (13) | 6 (19) | 0.38 |
| Previous cardiac surgery | 17 (12) | 10 (9) | 7 (23) | 0.048 |
| Valve size | 23 (23-26) | 23 (23-26) | 23 (23-26) | 0.50 |
| Peak gradient | 79 ± 25 | 77 ± 26 | 85 ± 22 | 0.17 |
| Mean gradient | 47 ± 18 | 46 ± 18 | 51 ± 15 | 0.25 |
| Valve area | 0.66 ± 0.16 | 0.68 ± 0.16 | 0.59 ± 0.15 | 0.005 |
| Low flow low gradient | 27 (20) | 23 (22) | 4 (13) | 0.29 |
| Preserved LV function | 112 (81) | 88 (82) | 21 (68) | 0.081 |
| Annulus area | 378 ± 39 | 377 ± 40 | 384 ± 38 | 0.37 |
Table 2 Echocardiographic characteristics of included patients post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation, mean ± SD
| Variable | Non-atrial fibrillation | Atrial fibrillation | ||||
| BEV (n = 59) | SEV (n = 48) | P value | BEV (n = 20) | SEV (n = 11) | P value | |
| Peak gradient, mmHg | 29 ± 12 | 17 ± 8 | < 0.001 | 29 ± 16 | 21 ± 15 | 0.15 |
| Mean gradient, mmHg | 16 ± 7 | 9 ± 5 | < 0.001 | 17 ± 9 | 11 ± 8 | 0.09 |
| LVOT VTI, cm | 25 ± 6 | 26 ± 6 | 0.20 | 21 ± 4 | 22 ± 7 | 0.53 |
| LVOT diameter, cm | 1.92 ± 0.17 | 1.90 ± 0.17 | 0.57 | 1.94 ± 0.16 | 1.90 ± 0.22 | 0.54 |
| Heart rate beat per minute | 70 ± 11 | 76 ± 14 | 0.014 | 76 ± 16 | 73 ± 15 | 0.61 |
| Stroke volume, mL | 72 ± 18 | 75 ± 21 | 0.45 | 63 ± 16 | 65 ± 25 | 0.87 |
| Cardiac output, L/minute | 5.0 ± 1.3 | 5.7 ± 1.5 | 0.029 | 4.6 ± 0.9 | 4.5 ± 1.2 | 0.67 |
| Cardiac index, L/minute/m2 | 2.9 ± 0.8 | 3.2 ± 0.8 | 0.083 | 2.6 ± 0.7 | 2.5 ± 0.6 | 0.83 |
Table 3 Clinical characteristics of included patients according to implanted platform, mean ± SD/n (%)/median (interquartile range)
| Variable | Non-atrial fibrillation | Atrial fibrillation | ||||
| BEV (n = 59) | SEV (n = 48) | P value | BEV (n = 20) | SEV (n = 11) | P value | |
| Age | 82 ± 6 | 82 ± 7 | 0.53 | 83 ± 4 | 79 ± 8 | 0.14 |
| Male gender | 15 (25) | 11 (23) | 0.76 | 2 (10) | 2 (18) | 0.52 |
| Body surface area | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 0.47 | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.3 | 0.52 |
| Diabetes | 14 (24) | 11 (23) | 0.92 | 8 (40) | 4 (36) | 0.84 |
| Smoker | 5 (9) | 5 (10) | 0.73 | 0 | 0 | |
| Hemoglobin | 123 ± 16 | 118 ± 17 | 0.12 | 120 ± 17 | 124 ± 20 | 0.59 |
| Previous MI | 5 (9) | 5 (10) | 0.73 | 4 (20) | 0 (0) | 0.11 |
| Chronic lung disease | 15 (25) | 12 (25) | 0.96 | 6 (30) | 3 (27) | 0.87 |
| Previous CVA/TIA | 8 (14) | 6 (13) | 0.87 | 5 (25) | 1 (9) | 0.28 |
| Previous cardiac surgery | 9 (15) | 1 (2) | 0.02 | 6 (30) | 1 (9) | 0.18 |
| Valve size | 23 (23-23) | 26 (26-29) | < 0.001 | 23 (23-26) | 26 (26-29) | < 0.001 |
| Peak gradient | 75 ± 23 | 80 ± 30 | 0.26 | 84 ± 19 | 86 ± 26 | 0.80 |
| Mean gradient | 45 ± 15 | 48 ± 21 | 0.40 | 51 ± 13 | 51 ± 21 | 0.99 |
| Valve area | 0.65 ± 0.17 | 0.71 ± 0.15 | 0.09 | 0.56 ± 0.14 | 0.63 ± 0.16 | 0.23 |
| Low flow low gradient | 15 (25) | 8 (17) | 0.27 | 2 (10) | 2 (18) | 0.52 |
| Preserved LV function | 44 (75) | 44 (92) | 0.021 | 14 (70) | 7 (64) | 0.72 |
| Annulus area | 379 ± 36 | 374 ± 44 | 0.60 | 388 ± 37 | 380 ± 41 | 0.56 |
- Citation: Omari M, Ibrahim M, Abukhalaf O, Abdalwahab A, Edwards R, Das R, Zaman A, Farag M, Alkhalil M. Differences in cardiac output of patients undergoing trans-catheter aortic valve implantation according to their underlying rhythm. World J Cardiol 2026; 18(2): 110803
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v18/i2/110803.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v18.i2.110803
