Optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention compared to angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for complex lesions

Figure 1  Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis flow diagram for identification and selection of studies included in the meta-analysis.

Figure 2 Forest plots of studies comparing optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention with angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in terms of major adverse clinical events. A: Meta-analysis using risk ratio as the effect measure; B: Meta-analysis using hazard ratio as the effect measure. HR: Hazard ratio; OCT: Optical coherence tomography; PCI: Percutaneous coronary intervention; RR: Risk ratio.

Figure 3 Forest plots of studies comparing optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention with angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in terms of target vessel failure. A: Meta-analysis using risk ratio as the effect measure; B: Meta-analysis using hazard ratio as the effect measure. HR: Hazard ratio; OCT: Optical coherence tomography; PCI: Percutaneous coronary intervention; RR: Risk ratio.

Figure 4 Forest plots of studies comparing optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention with angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in terms of all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality. A: All-cause mortality; B: Cardiac mortality. HR: Hazard ratio; OCT: Optical coherence tomography; PCI: Percutaneous coronary intervention; RR: Risk ratio.

Figure 5 Forest plots of studies comparing optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention with angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in terms of any myocardial infarction, periprocedural myocardial infarction, and target vessel myocardial infarction. A: Any myocardial infarction; B: Periprocedural myocardial infarction; C: Target vessel myocardial infarction. HR: Hazard ratio; OCT: Optical coherence tomography; PCI: Percutaneous coronary intervention; RR: Risk ratio.

Figure 6 Forest plots of studies comparing optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention with angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in terms of revascularization outcomes. A: Any revascularization; B: Target vessel revascularization; C: Target lesion revascularization. HR: Hazard ratio; OCT: Optical coherence tomography; PCI: Percutaneous coronary intervention; RR: Risk ratio.

Figure 7 Forest plots of studies comparing optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention with angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in terms of stent thrombosis and definite stent thrombosis. A: Stent thrombosis; B: Definite stent thrombosis. HR: Hazard ratio; OCT: Optical coherence tomography; PCI: Percutaneous coronary intervention; RR: Risk ratio.