Kalinina A, Mzhavanadze N, Kalinin R, Suchkov I. Comparative characteristics of in vitro models for studying angiogenesis in cardiovascular disease. World J Cardiol 2026; 18(1): 106885 [DOI: 10.4330/wjc.v18.i1.106885]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Nina Mzhavanadze, Department of Cardiovascular, Endovascular Surgery and Diagnostic Radiology, Ryazan State Medical University, Vysokovoltnaya 9, Ryazan 390026, Russia. nina_mzhavanadze@mail.ru
Research Domain of This Article
Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems
Article-Type of This Article
Minireviews
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Jan 26, 2026 (publication date) through Jan 15, 2026
Times Cited of This Article
Times Cited (0)
Journal Information of This Article
Publication Name
World Journal of Cardiology
ISSN
1949-8462
Publisher of This Article
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Share the Article
Kalinina A, Mzhavanadze N, Kalinin R, Suchkov I. Comparative characteristics of in vitro models for studying angiogenesis in cardiovascular disease. World J Cardiol 2026; 18(1): 106885 [DOI: 10.4330/wjc.v18.i1.106885]
World J Cardiol. Jan 26, 2026; 18(1): 106885 Published online Jan 26, 2026. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v18.i1.106885
Comparative characteristics of in vitro models for studying angiogenesis in cardiovascular disease
Anastasia Kalinina, Nina Mzhavanadze, Roman Kalinin, Igor Suchkov
Anastasia Kalinina, Medical Faculty, Ryazan State Medical University, Ryazan 390026, Ryazanskaya Oblast’, Russia
Nina Mzhavanadze, Roman Kalinin, Igor Suchkov, Department of Cardiovascular, Endovascular Surgery and Diagnostic Radiology, Ryazan State Medical University, Ryazan 390026, Russia
Author contributions: Kalinina A and Mzhavanadze N interpreted data, drafted and translated the manuscript; Kalinin R and Suchkov I designed the study, interpreted data, and approved the final version.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Nina Mzhavanadze, Department of Cardiovascular, Endovascular Surgery and Diagnostic Radiology, Ryazan State Medical University, Vysokovoltnaya 9, Ryazan 390026, Russia. nina_mzhavanadze@mail.ru
Received: March 10, 2025 Revised: May 30, 2025 Accepted: November 25, 2025 Published online: January 26, 2026 Processing time: 311 Days and 11.6 Hours
Abstract
Angiogenesis is a central mechanism in the development and progression of cardiovascular diseases. Experimental approaches for studying angiogenesis vary widely, and their translational value depends strongly on model characteristics. We aimed to provide a comparative analysis of contemporary in vitro models used to study angiogenesis and to assess their potential applicability in cardiovascular medicine. Fifty-four publications by domestic and international authors were analyzed. 2D models remain accessible tools for investigating endothelial proliferation, migration, and early angiogenic responses; they are easy to implement and highly reproducible, but lack physiological relevance. 3D models better recapitulate extracellular matrix architecture and cell-cell interactions, providing higher biological fidelity at the cost of increased technical complexity and expense. Microfluidic systems reproduce hemodynamic forces and microenvironmental gradients with the highest degree of physiological relevance, but are time- and resource-intensive. Models based on induced pluripotent stem cells enable patient-specific investigations and disease modeling, although they can be limited by variability and potential instability. No single in vitro platform fully reproduces the complexity of angiogenesis. Model selection should be aligned with specific research objectives. Integrating 3D culture systems, microfluidics, and artificial intelligence-assisted analysis is particularly promising for advancing angiogenesis research in cardiovascular medicine.
Core Tip: Experimental angiogenesis research is rapidly evolving in cardiovascular medicine. In vitro models offer precise control and stable experimental conditions with favorable cost-effectiveness compared with ex vivo and in vivo approaches. Limitations include incomplete reproduction of physiological conditions, particularly in 2D systems. Wider implementation of 3D culture, microfluidic platforms, and artificial intelligence should be considered to achieve more comprehensive and physiologically relevant studies of angiogenesis despite greater complexity and cost.