Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2026; 18(3): 115621
Published online Mar 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i3.115621
Published online Mar 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i3.115621
Table 1 Comparison of baseline characteristics between the 2 groups, n (%)/mean ± SD
| Characteristic | Group | χ2/t | P value | |
| Study (n = 100) | Control (n = 100) | |||
| Age, years | 52.36 ± 8.72 | 53.18 ± 9.21 | 0.647 | 0.519 |
| Sex (male/female) | 58/42 | 61/39 | 0.187 | 0.666 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 23.57 ± 2.82 | 23.85 ± 3.19 | 0.658 | 0.512 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 28 (28.00) | 32 (32.00) | 0.381 | 0.537 |
| Hypertension | 35 (35.00) | 38 (38.00) | 0.194 | 0.660 |
| Primary diagnosis | 1.241 | 0.743 | ||
| Carcinoma of head of pancreas | 52 (52.00) | 55 (55.00) | ||
| Ampullary carcinoma | 25 (25.00) | 22 (22.00) | ||
| Distal cholangiocarcinoma | 15 (15.00) | 18 (18.00) | ||
| Others | 8 (8.00) | 5 (5.00) | ||
| Operative procedure | 0.500 | 0.480 | ||
| Child method | 78 (78.00) | 82 (82.00) | ||
| Whipple procedure | 22 (22.00) | 18 (18.00) | ||
| Operative duration, minute | 320.54 ± 55.27 | 325.84 ± 60.13 | 0.649 | 0.517 |
| Intraoperative blood loss, mL | 450.21 ± 80.58 | 465.33 ± 95.78 | 1.208 | 0.228 |
| Pancreatic texture | 0.325 | 0.569 | ||
| Soft | 42 (42.00) | 46 (46.00) | ||
| Firm | 58 (58.00) | 54 (54.00) | ||
| Main pancreatic duct diameter, mm | 0.202 | 0.653 | ||
| ≥ 3 | 65 (65.00) | 68 (68.00) | ||
| < 3 | 35 (35.00) | 32 (32.00) | ||
Table 2 Comparison of nutritional indicators: Preoperative (before) vs postoperative day 7 (after), mean ± SD
| Group | n | ALB (g/L) | Pre-ALB (mg/L) | TF (g/L) | |||
| Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | ||
| Study | 100 | 38.28 ± 4.10 | 37.80 ± 3.87 | 220.53 ± 55.32 | 215.68 ± 51.37 | 2.48 ± 0.43 | 2.43 ± 0.39 |
| Control | 100 | 37.85 ± 4.54 | 32.57 ± 3.76 | 215.86 ± 58.72 | 187.69 ± 50.12 | 2.46 ± 0.38 | 1.97 ± 0.45 |
| t | 0.703 | 9.693 | 0.579 | 3.900 | 0.349 | 7.725 | |
| P value | 0.483 | 0.000 | 0.563 | 0.000 | 0.728 | 0.000 | |
Table 3 Comparison of gastrointestinal function recovery time and postoperative length of stay, mean ± SD
| Index | Study group (n = 100) | Control group (n = 100) | t | P value |
| Return of bowel sounds, hour | 38.56 ± 12.32 | 62.88 ± 18.73 | 10.848 | < 0.001 |
| Time to first flatus, hour | 48.21 ± 15.65 | 78.56 ± 22.48 | 11.080 | < 0.001 |
| Time to first defecation, hour | 72.43 ± 20.10 | 105.38 ± 28.95 | 9.349 | < 0.001 |
| Postoperative hospital stay, days | 14.25 ± 3.83 | 18.77 ± 5.24 | 6.964 | < 0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of anastomotic leakage between the 2 groups, n (%)
| Type of AL | Study (n = 100) | Control (n = 100) | χ2 | P value | OR (95%CI) |
| Overall AL | 18 (18.00) | 32 (32.00) | 5.227 | 0.022 | 0.467 (0.241-0.904) |
| Pancreatic fistula (grade B/C) | 12 (12.00) | 25 (25.00) | 5.604 | 0.018 | 0.409 (0.192-0.870) |
| Bile leak | 6 (6.00) | 9 (9.00) | 0.617 | 0.432 | 0.652 (0.223-1.907) |
| Gastroenteric AL | 3 (3.00) | 6 (6.00) | - | 0.498a | 0.500 (0.129-1.950) |
| ≥ 2 concurrent fistulas | 2 (2.00) | 5 (5.00) | - | 0.445a | 0.400 (0.079-2.014) |
Table 5 Binary logistic regression analysis of risk-factors for anastomotic leakage
| Variable | β coefficient | SE | χ2 | P value | OR (95%CI) |
| Early enteral nutrition | -0.868 | 0.362 | 5.75 | 0.016 | 0.419 (0.210-0.850) |
| Age, years | 0.028 | 0.018 | 2.418 | 0.120 | 1.028 (0.993-1.065) |
| Sex | -0.204 | 0.351 | 0.339 | 0.561 | 0.815 (0.412-1.618) |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | -0.041 | 0.062 | 0.439 | 0.507 | 0.959 (0.851-1.078) |
| History of diabetes | 0.387 | 0.378 | 1.050 | 0.307 | 1.472 (0.703-3.088) |
| Soft pancreatic texture | 1.055 | 0.361 | 8.539 | 0.003 | 2.871 (1.420-5.810) |
| Pancreatic duct < 3 mm | 0.854 | 0.359 | 5.659 | 0.015 | 2.348 (1.180-4.670) |
| Operative duration, minute | 0.008 | 0.003 | 7.111 | 0.008 | 1.008 (1.002-1.014) |
| Intraoperative blood loss, mL | 0.002 | 0.001 | 4.000 | 0.134 | 1.002 (1.000-1.004) |
- Citation: Yan B, Zhang LQ, Shen YQ. Correlation between the initiation of early enteral nutrition and anastomotic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(3): 115621
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i3/115621.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i3.115621
