BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2026; 18(3): 115621
Published online Mar 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i3.115621
Table 1 Comparison of baseline characteristics between the 2 groups, n (%)/mean ± SD
Characteristic
Group
χ2/t
P value
Study (n = 100)
Control (n = 100)
Age, years52.36 ± 8.7253.18 ± 9.210.6470.519
Sex (male/female)58/4261/390.1870.666
Body mass index, kg/m223.57 ± 2.8223.85 ± 3.190.6580.512
Diabetes mellitus28 (28.00)32 (32.00)0.3810.537
Hypertension35 (35.00)38 (38.00)0.1940.660
Primary diagnosis1.2410.743
    Carcinoma of head of pancreas52 (52.00)55 (55.00)
    Ampullary carcinoma25 (25.00)22 (22.00)
    Distal cholangiocarcinoma15 (15.00)18 (18.00)
    Others8 (8.00)5 (5.00)
Operative procedure0.5000.480
    Child method78 (78.00)82 (82.00)
    Whipple procedure22 (22.00)18 (18.00)
Operative duration, minute320.54 ± 55.27325.84 ± 60.130.6490.517
Intraoperative blood loss, mL450.21 ± 80.58465.33 ± 95.781.2080.228
Pancreatic texture0.3250.569
    Soft42 (42.00)46 (46.00)
    Firm58 (58.00)54 (54.00)
Main pancreatic duct diameter, mm0.2020.653
    ≥ 365 (65.00)68 (68.00)
    < 335 (35.00)32 (32.00)
Table 2 Comparison of nutritional indicators: Preoperative (before) vs postoperative day 7 (after), mean ± SD
Group
n
ALB (g/L)
Pre-ALB (mg/L)
TF (g/L)
Before
After
Before
After
Before
After
Study 10038.28 ± 4.1037.80 ± 3.87220.53 ± 55.32215.68 ± 51.372.48 ± 0.432.43 ± 0.39
Control 10037.85 ± 4.5432.57 ± 3.76215.86 ± 58.72187.69 ± 50.122.46 ± 0.381.97 ± 0.45
t0.7039.6930.5793.9000.3497.725
P value0.4830.0000.5630.0000.7280.000
Table 3 Comparison of gastrointestinal function recovery time and postoperative length of stay, mean ± SD
Index
Study group (n = 100)
Control group (n = 100)
t
P value
Return of bowel sounds, hour38.56 ± 12.3262.88 ± 18.7310.848< 0.001
Time to first flatus, hour48.21 ± 15.6578.56 ± 22.4811.080< 0.001
Time to first defecation, hour72.43 ± 20.10105.38 ± 28.959.349< 0.001
Postoperative hospital stay, days14.25 ± 3.8318.77 ± 5.246.964< 0.001
Table 4 Comparison of anastomotic leakage between the 2 groups, n (%)
Type of AL
Study (n = 100)
Control (n = 100)
χ2
P value
OR (95%CI)
Overall AL18 (18.00)32 (32.00)5.2270.0220.467 (0.241-0.904)
Pancreatic fistula (grade B/C)12 (12.00)25 (25.00)5.6040.0180.409 (0.192-0.870)
Bile leak6 (6.00)9 (9.00)0.6170.4320.652 (0.223-1.907)
Gastroenteric AL3 (3.00)6 (6.00)-0.498a0.500 (0.129-1.950)
≥ 2 concurrent fistulas2 (2.00)5 (5.00)-0.445a0.400 (0.079-2.014)
Table 5 Binary logistic regression analysis of risk-factors for anastomotic leakage
Variable
β coefficient
SE
χ2
P value
OR (95%CI)
Early enteral nutrition-0.8680.3625.750.0160.419 (0.210-0.850)
Age, years0.0280.0182.4180.1201.028 (0.993-1.065)
Sex-0.2040.3510.3390.5610.815 (0.412-1.618)
Body mass index, kg/m2-0.0410.0620.4390.5070.959 (0.851-1.078)
History of diabetes0.3870.3781.0500.3071.472 (0.703-3.088)
Soft pancreatic texture1.0550.3618.5390.0032.871 (1.420-5.810)
Pancreatic duct < 3 mm0.8540.3595.6590.0152.348 (1.180-4.670)
Operative duration, minute0.0080.0037.1110.0081.008 (1.002-1.014)
Intraoperative blood loss, mL0.0020.0014.0000.1341.002 (1.000-1.004)