©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2026; 18(2): 115417
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.115417
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.115417
Table 1 Comparative summary of somatostatin and its analogs in the prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula
| Agent | Mechanism | Evidence level | Effect on POPF | Limited factors |
| Somatostatin (IV infusion) | Pancreatic enzyme suppression (SSTR1-5) | High | Decrease POPF (strong, consistent) | Requires IV infusion |
| Pasireotide | Broad SSTR1-5 affinity | High (RCT + meta-analyses) | Decrease CR-POPF (56% RRR) | Cost, hyperglycemia |
| Octreotide | SSTR2, SSTR5 selective | Moderate | Decrease biochemical leaks; inconsistent CR-POPF | Dosing variability |
| Lanreotide | Long-acting SSTR2, SSTR5 | Moderate | Modest POPF reduction | Limited data |
| Combined protocols (SSA + drainage) | Synergistic mechanical and pharmacologic control | Moderate-high | Decrease POPF and severity | Implementation complexity |
Table 2 Studies associated with the effect of somatostatin and its analogs on postoperative pancreatic fistula occurrence
| Ref. | Study group | Intervention | Outcome |
| Pillarisetty et al[15] | 98 patients undergoing either PD or DP | A single dose of preoperative lanreotide (120 mg) | CR-POPF or intraabdominal abscess was observed in 8 (8%) patients in the total cohort: 7 (11.2%) in the PD group and 1 (2.7%) in the DP group. Biochemical leak was detected in 12 (12.2%) patients |
| Vuorela et al[11] | A total of 258 patients who underwent DP between 2000 and 2016 at Helsinki University Hospital | 900-μg pasireotide administered subcutaneously twice daily for a maximum of 7 days or octreotide administrated through a 200-μg infusion twice daily for 3 days | 40 CR-POPF grade B and C (16%; P = 0.739). CR-POPF in the pasireotide group was 7 (15%), 3 (10%) in the octreotide group and 28 (17%) in the control group (P = 0.630) |
| Yoon et al[8] | Patients who underwent PD at Samsung Medical Center from June 2019 to July 2020 (totally 263 patients, 81 patients in the low-risk group and 182 patients in the high-risk group). CR-POPF was calculated using the nomogram-based web calculator (http://popf.smchbp.org) | Postoperative octreotide for more than three days | No statistically significant differences of CR-POPF between octreotide group and the control group in all patients (15.0% vs 14.7%, P = 0.963) and in the high-risk group (16.1% vs 23.6%, P = 0.206) |
| Herzberg et al[3] | Patients undergoing pancreatic surgery (PD and rescue pancreatectomy) for pancreatic cancer at Reinbek Hospital St. Adolf-Stift, Germany, from January 2013 till December 2022 | Fail-safe protocol included 0.2 mg of octreotide intravenously before the start of the pancreatic resection, in order to block the exocrine pancreatic secretion. Continued by 0.1 mg octreotide every 8 hours subcutaneously for the first 5 postoperative days | Fail-safe protocol in oncologic pancreatic head surgery can lower the rates of overall POPF grade B/C rate of 4.2% vs 18.8% (P = 0.012) before implementation of the fail-safe protocol |
| Potter et al[10] | A total of 100 patients undergoing elective PD or DP between January 2013 and April 2020 who received perioperative pasireotide therapy | Full course of pasireotide: Either a preoperative dose plus 7 days of postoperative therapy, or pasireotide continued until day of surgical drain removal in the setting of low drain amylase or partial course: A single preoperative dose and early discontinuation due to side effects | Relative to patients receiving full-course pasireotide, a single preprocedure dose was not associated with higher odds of any POPF (OR = 0.90, 95%CI: 0.31-2.61, P = 0.85) |
| Bootsma et al[7] | 1992 patients who underwent elective, open pancreatoduodenectomy between 2014 and 2017 at all 16 Dutch centers for pancreatic surgery | 6 protocols based on the hospital the operation took place: (1) No SA administered; (2) Octreotide 100 mg subcutaneous injection three times a day for seven days, starting the day before surgery; (3) Lanreotide 120 mg subcutaneous injection at home a few days before surgery; (4) Pasireotideo 900 μg of subcutaneous pasireotide twice daily beginning preoperatively and continuing for 7 days (14 doses). Administered in patients deemed as high-risk; (5) Octreotide HR 100 mg subcutaneous injection three times a day for five-seven days, starting the day before surgery or on the first postoperative day; and (6) Lanreotide HR 120 mg subcutaneous injection at home a few days before surgery or on the first postoperative day | POPF occurred less often in patients treated according to lanreotide protocol (n = 75, 10.0%) and octreotide-HR (n = 15, 9.4%) and no SA protocol (n = 30, 12.7%), compared to a higher incidence in hospitals with lanreotide-HR (n = 52, 15.1%), octreotide (n = 54, 17.8%) and pasireotide protocol (n = 35, 19.1%). The rate of grade C POPF did not differ significantly (P = 0.358) between hospitals with octreotide-HR protocol (n = 4, 2.5%), lanreotide-HR protocol (n = 23, 2.9%), no protocol (n = 7, 3.0%), lanreotide (n = 23, 3.1%), octreotide (n = 12, 4.0%), and pasireotide protocol (n = 12, 6.0%) |
| Gaujoux et al[1] | Adult patients (≥ 18 years) who were scheduled to undergo either PD or DP with or without splenectomy | Continuous intravenous somatostatin 6 mg per day for 6 days and 3 mg on POD 7 or subcutaneous octreotide 100 μg subcutaneously 3 times per day until POD 6 and then 100 μg 2 times on POD 7. Treatment initiation starting intraoperatively just after surgical exploration | No statistically significant difference in the incidence of grade B or C POPF between patients treated with somatostatin (24.1%) and patients treated with octreotide (22.9%) (P = 0.73). Comparing all grades of POPF in the ISGPS classification (A/B/C) there was no difference between the two groups (51.9% in the somatostatin arm vs 48.3% in the octreotide arm, P = 0.37) |
- Citation: Lazaridou L, Dimaki A, Vakalou K, Zervas V, Papadopoulos P, Koumarelas KE, Christodoulidis G. Somatostatin and its analogs in the management of postoperative pancreatic fistulas: A comprehensive review. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(2): 115417
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i2/115417.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.115417
