©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2026; 18(2): 113979
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.113979
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.113979
Table 1 Summary of evidence comparing ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract vs conventional surgery for anal fistula
| Outcome | Studies | Q | P value (Q test) | I2 (%) | 95%CI of I2 (%) | RR | RR P value | RR 95%CI | MD | MD P value | MD 95%CI |
| Cure rate | 39 | 102.97 | < 0.0001 | 63.1 | 48.0-73.8 | 1.0762 | 0.0074 | 1.0198-1.1356 | |||
| Recurrence rate | 23 | 52.04 | 0.0003 | 57.7 | 32.8-73.4 | 0.6124 | 0.0323 | 0.3909-0.9595 | |||
| Complication rate | 31 | 13.07 | 0.9969 | 0.0 | 0.0-40.2 | 0.2536 | < 0.0001 | 0.1994-0.3224 | |||
| Overall effectiveness | 67 | 128.13 | < 0.0001 | 48.5 | 31.5-61.3 | 1.1385 | < 0.0001 | 1.1094-1.1684 | |||
| VAS | 48 | 23290.42 | 0 | 99.8 | -1.7216 | < 0.0001 | -2.1018 to | ||||
| Wound healing time | 61 | 3691.79 | 0 | 98.4 | 98.2-98.6 | -8.4489 | < 0.0001 | -9.7276 to | |||
| Anal function | 33 | 6307.39 | 0 | 99.5 | 99.5-99.6 | -1.3793 | < 0.0001 | -1.9136 to | |||
| Operative time | 41 | 8043.29 | 0 | 99.5 | 99.5-99.6 | 3.7127 | 0.0914 | -0.5975 to 8.0230 |
Table 2 Summary of Evidence for ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract vs conventional surgery-continuous outcomes
| Outcome | Number of studies (RCTs) | LIFT group (n) | Conventional group (n) | Effect (95%CI) | Certainty of evidence | Reasons for downgrading |
| Dichotomous outcomes | ||||||
| Cure rate | 39 | 1379/1762 | 1273/1764 | RR = 1.08 (1.02-1.14) | Moderate | Serious risk of bias, inconsistency |
| Recurrence rate | 23 | 96/1047 | 139/1048 | RR = 0.61 (0.39-0.96) | Moderate | Serious risk of bias, inconsistency |
| Complication rate | 31 | 75/1325 | 295/1326 | RR = 0.25 (0.20-0.32) | Low | Serious risk of bias, imprecision |
| Overall clinical effectiveness | 67 | 2568/2709 | 2221/2709 | RR = 1.14 (1.11-1.17) | Moderate | Serious risk of bias, inconsistency |
| Continuous outcomes | ||||||
| Postoperative pain (VAS) | 48 | 2086 | 2134 | MD = -1.72 (-2.10 to -1.34) | Moderate | Serious risk of bias, inconsistency |
| Wound healing time (days) | 61 | 2588 | 2640 | MD = -8.45 (-9.73 to -7.17) | Moderate | Serious risk of bias, inconsistency |
| Anal function (score) | 33 | 1300 | 1347 | MD = -1.38 (-1.91 to -0.85) | Moderate | Serious risk of bias, inconsistency |
| Operative time (minutes) | 41 | 1789 | 1811 | MD = 3.71 (-0.60 to 8.02) | Moderate | Serious risk of bias, inconsistency |
- Citation: Li X, Zhi CC, Wang XL, Zheng LH, Cheng YC. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract vs conventional surgery for anal fistula in Chinese patients. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(2): 113979
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i2/113979.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.113979
