BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2026; 18(2): 113021
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.113021
Table 1 Patient baseline characteristics, n (%)/mean ± SD/median (interquartile range)
Characteristic
Overall (n = 278)
Training set (n = 222)
Test set (n = 56)
LVI-negative (n = 157)
LVI-positive (n = 121)
Test statistic
P value
Age (years)62.5 ± 11.862.3 ± 11.963.2 ± 11.461.8 ± 12.263.4 ± 11.21.1480.254
Gender4.6510.031
Male164 (59.0)131 (59.0)33 (58.9)85 (54.1)79 (65.3)
Female114 (41.0)91 (41.0)23 (41.1)72 (45.9)42 (34.7)
Maximum tumor diameter (cm)4.2 ± 1.64.1 ± 1.54.5 ± 1.83.8 ± 1.44.7 ± 1.74.982< 0.001
CEA (ng/mL)8.4 (3.2-21.6)8.1 (3.1-20.8)9.2 (3.5-24.1)5.8 (2.8-15.2)14.2 (5.7-35.8)4.521< 0.001
CA19-9 (U/mL)18.3 (8.7-42.5)17.9 (8.5-41.2)19.8 (9.2-45.7)15.1 (7.8-28.6)25.8 (12.4-58.9)2.9470.003
Differentiation grade22.184< 0.001
Well-differentiated45 (16.2)37 (16.7)8 (14.3)35 (22.3)10 (8.3)
Moderately-differentiated198 (71.2)158 (71.2)40 (71.4)115 (73.2)83 (68.6)
Poorly-differentiated35 (12.6)27 (12.2)8 (14.3)7 (4.5)28 (23.1)
T stage28.756< 0.001
T1-T267 (24.1)54 (24.3)13 (23.2)52 (33.1)15 (12.4)
T3156 (56.1)124 (55.9)32 (57.1)92 (58.6)64 (52.9)
T455 (19.8)44 (19.8)11 (19.6)13 (8.3)42 (34.7)
N stage18.942< 0.001
N0142 (51.1)114 (51.4)28 (50.0)98 (62.4)44 (36.4)
N198 (35.3)78 (35.1)20 (35.7)47 (29.9)51 (42.1)
N238 (13.7)30 (13.5)8 (14.3)12 (7.6)26 (21.5)
Perineural invasion24.317< 0.001
Negative201 (72.3)161 (72.5)40 (71.4)132 (84.1)69 (57.0)
Positive77 (27.7)61 (27.5)16 (28.6)25 (15.9)52 (43.0)
Table 2 Radiomics feature selection results
Selection step
FS-T2WI
DWI
T1CE
Total
Initial features1425138513904200
After ICC screening (> 0.75)1182114311983523
After variance screening1094104811293271
After correlation screening (|r| < 0.9)6746386912003
After univariate screening (P < 0.05)12194135350
After LASSO screening86923
Table 3 Logistic regression analysis of lymphovascular invasion predictors
VariableUnivariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
OR (95%CI)
P value
OR (95%CI)
P value
Gender (male vs female)1.590 (1.037-2.438)0.0321.421 (0.859-2.351)0.168
Tumor diameter (≥ 4 cm vs < 4 cm)2.834 (1.781-4.504)< 0.0012.142 (1.251-3.668)0.006
CEA (≥ 5 ng/mL vs < 5 ng/mL)2.953 (1.712-5.088)< 0.0012.261 (1.224-4.191)0.009
CA19-9 (≥ 37 U/mL vs < 37 U/mL)1.892 (1.181-3.031)0.0081.354 (0.782-2.334)0.284
Differentiation (poor vs well/moderate)4.571 (2.451-8.529)< 0.0013.824 (1.912-7.654)< 0.001
T stage (T3-4 vs T1-2)3.421 (1.889-6.194)< 0.0012.581 (1.329-5.003)0.005
N stage (N1-2 vs N0)2.903 (1.831-4.604)< 0.0012.314 (1.381-3.872)0.001
Perineural invasion (positive vs negative)3.984 (2.318-6.837)< 0.0012.951 (1.612-5.406)< 0.001
Table 4 Performance of different models on training and test sets
Model
Training set
Test set
AUC (95%CI)
Sensitivity
Specificity
AUC (95%CI)
Sensitivity
Specificity
FS-T2WI0.756 (0.693-0.819)0.7290.7140.742 (0.615-0.869)0.7200.710
DWI0.721 (0.655-0.787)0.6870.6980.708 (0.574-0.842)0.6800.677
T1CE0.789 (0.730-0.848)0.7710.7300.775 (0.654-0.896)0.7600.742
Multimodal radiomics0.847 (0.796-0.898)0.8230.7940.835 (0.732-0.938)0.8400.774
Clinical model0.798 (0.738-0.858)0.7500.7620.782 (0.660-0.904)0.7200.774
Combined model0.883 (0.840-0.926)0.8440.8250.867 (0.778-0.956)0.8400.806