Fu Zheng Li Qi Tang combined with FOCUS-PDCA model in postoperative rehabilitation of elderly biliary surgery patients

Table 1 Comparative analysis of postoperative recovery in the two groups (mean ± SD)

Groups	n	Time in bed (days)	Time to first flatus (hours)	Postoperative hospitalization (days)
Observation group	60	1.55 ± 0.53	48.25 ± 5.37	7.28 ± 1.72
Control group	60	2.68 ± 0.65	55.67 ± 6.47	11.70 ± 1.91
t		10.43	6.825	13.33
P value		< 0.0001	< 0.0001	< 0.0001

Comparison of postoperative pain Visual Analog Scale scores.

Table 2 Comparative analysis of Visual Analog Scale scores (mean ± SD)

Groups	n	6 hours postoperatively (points)	12 hours postoperatively (points)	24 hours postoperatively (points)
Observation group	60	4.12 ± 0.32	2.15 ± 0.36	1.07 ± 0.25
Control group	60	5.27 ± 0.45	3.08 ± 0.28	2.12 ± 0.42
t		16.16	15.88	16.75
P value		< 0.0001	< 0.0001	< 0.0001

Comparison of postoperative complications.

Table 3 Comparative analysis of surgical complications, n (%)

Groups	n	Infection	Bile leakage	Bleeding	Bleeding nausea and vomiting	Total incidence
Observation group	60	2 (3.33)	1 (1.67)	2 (3.33)	3 (5.00)	8 (13.33)
Control group	60	6 (10.00)	2 (3.33)	5 (8.33)	7 (11.67)	20 (33.33)
χ2		6.708
P value		0.010

Table 4 Comparative analysis of patient satisfaction, n (%)

Groups	n	Highly satisfied	Satisfied	Satisfied neutral	Dissatisfied	Total satisfaction
Observation group	60	30 (50.00)	20 (33.33)	8 (13.33)	2 (3.33)	50 (83.33)
Control group	60	17 (28.33)	23 (38.33)	15 (25.00)	5 (8.33)	40 (66.67)
χ2		4.44
P value		0.035