Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jul 27, 2025; 17(7): 106341
Published online Jul 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.106341
Published online Jul 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.106341
Table 1 Comparison of baseline data between the two groups
Group | n | Sex (cases) | Age (years), mean ± SD | Tumor type (cases) | Clinical staging (cases) | Education level (cases) | |||||
Male | Female | Colon cancer | Rectal cancer | Stage I | Stage II | Junior high school or lower | Senior high school | University or higher | |||
Research group | 61 | 35 | 26 | 73.66 ± 4.82 | 31 | 30 | 26 | 35 | 16 | 28 | 17 |
Control group | 65 | 36 | 29 | 73.31 ± 5.76 | 39 | 26 | 32 | 33 | 14 | 30 | 21 |
χ2/t | - | 0.051 | 0.369 | 1.074 | 0.553 | 0.497 | |||||
P value | - | 0.822 | 0.713 | 0.300 | 0.457 | 0.780 |
Table 2 Clinical indicators of the two groups, mean ± SD
Group | n | Postoperative time to passage of gas by anus (hour) | Fever (cases) | Duration of fever (hour) | Length of hospital stay (day) | Hospitalization costs (ten thousand yuan) |
Research group | 61 | 52.63 ± 8.22 | 6 | 49.68 ± 6.01 | 6.51 ± 0.73 | 4.25 ± 0.66 |
Control group | 65 | 67.45 ± 7.68 | 15 | 64.33 ± 5.37 | 8.47 ± 0.95 | 5.33 ± 0.79 |
χ2/t | - | 10.463 | 3.972 | 14.447 | 12.925 | 6.224 |
P value | - | < 0.001 | 0.046 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Table 3 Comparison of nutritional status between the two groups, mean ± SD
Group | n | Hb (g/L) | PAB (mg/L) | TRF (g/L) | PG-SGA (points) | ||||
Pre-intervention | Post-intervention | Pre-intervention | Post-intervention | Pre-intervention | Post-intervention | Pre-intervention | Post-intervention | ||
Research group | 61 | 102.33 ± 10.52 | 121.67 ± 13.13 | 152.32 ± 18.71 | 245.54 ± 23.01 | 1.41 ± 0.15 | 2.31 ± 0.20 | 10.29 ± 1.33 | 4.55 ± 0.48 |
Control group | 65 | 104.28 ± 9.47 | 113.46 ± 14.85 | 151.78 ± 16.52 | 210.37 ± 22.41 | 1.42 ± 0.13 | 1.98 ± 0.12 | 10.31 ± 1.48 | 5.81 ± 0.56 |
t | - | 1.095 | 3.279 | 0.172 | 8.690 | 0.401 | 11.311 | 0.080 | 13.519 |
P value | - | 0.276 | 0.001 | 0.864 | < 0.001 | 0.689 | < 0.001 | 0.967 | < 0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of immune response between the two groups, mean ± SD
Group | n | IgG (g/L) | IgA (g/L) | IgM (g/L) | |||
Pre-intervention | Post-intervention | Pre-intervention | Post-intervention | Pre-intervention | Post-intervention | ||
Research group | 61 | 6.25 ± 0.59 | 8.40 ± 0.87 | 1.32 ± 0.15 | 1.64 ± 0.18 | 1.23 ± 0.11 | 1.51 ± 0.19 |
Control group | 65 | 6.21 ± 0.68 | 7.31 ± 0.91 | 1.36 ± 0.13 | 1.41 ± 0.13 | 1.20 ± 0.09 | 1.32 ± 0.15 |
t | - | 0.352 | 6.864 | 1.602 | 8.260 | 1.680 | 6.250 |
P value | - | 0.726 | < 0.001 | 0.112 | < 0.001 | 0.096 | < 0.001 |
Table 5 Comparison of inflammatory indicators between the two groups, mean ± SD
Group | n | NF-κB (U/L) | IL-1 (g/L) | IL-8 (μg/L) | TNF-α (μg/L) | ||||
Pre-intervention | Post-intervention | Pre-intervention | Post-intervention | Pre-intervention | Post-intervention | Pre-intervention | Post-intervention | ||
Research group | 61 | 17.55 ± 1.83 | 13.21 ± 1.02 | 50.48 ± 5.92 | 32.18 ± 3.88 | 29.28 ± 2.50 | 22.12 ± 2.08 | 61.35 ± 6.14 | 48.71 ± 6.94 |
Control group | 65 | 17.63 ± 1.25 | 15.08 ± 1.23 | 51.12 ± 6.48 | 40.75 ± 4.11 | 29.85 ± 2.63 | 25.81 ± 2.16 | 60.89 ± 5.87 | 52.64 ± 7.18 |
t | - | 0.288 | 9.257 | 0.578 | 12.018 | 1.245 | 9.756 | 0.430 | 3.120 |
P value | - | 0.774 | < 0.001 | 0.565 | < 0.001 | 0.215 | < 0.001 | 0.668 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Ni SS, Du Y. Effect of graded nutritional intervention on elderly colorectal cancer patients’ postop status. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(7): 106341
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i7/106341.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.106341