BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Nov 27, 2025; 17(11): 110490
Published online Nov 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i11.110490
Table 1 Clinical characteristics of patients with perforated gastric cancer according to initial surgical approach - primary perforation repair and one-stage gastrectomy groups
Variables
Primary perforation repair, n = 26
One-stage gastrectomy, n = 10
P value
Sex, n (%)0.722
    Female11 (42.3)5 (50)
    Male15 (57.7)5 (50)
Age (years)61 ± 13.466.5 ± 11.30.263
Body mass index (kg/m²)21.1 ± 4.623.5 ± 3.00.145
Hemoglobin (g/dL)10.5 ± 2.310.2 ± 2.40.736
    < 11, n (%)17 (65.4)7 (70)1.0
Albumin (g/dL), n (%)3.0 (0.9)3.2 (0.7)0.492
    < 3.516 (61.5)6 (60)1.000
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio1.92 ± 1.152.56 ± 1.160.145
Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index, n (%)0.688
    019 (73.1)6 (60)
    ≥ 17 (26.9)4 (40)
American Society of Anesthesiologists, n (%)0.260
    I/II9 (34.6)6 (60)
    III/IV17 (65.4)4 (40)
Tumor location, n (%)0.709
    Distal third9 (34.6)5 (50)
    Middle third4 (15.4)1 (10)
    Proximal third9 (34.6)4 (40)
    Linite plastica4 (15.4)0 (0)
Lauren type, n (%)0.024
    Intestinal12 (46.2)9 (90)
    Diffuse/mixed14 (53.8)1 (10)
Histological tumor grade, n (%)0.014
    Well/moderately differentiated4 (15.4)6 (60)
    Poorly differentiated22 (84.6)4 (40)
Table 2 Clinical stage and surgical outcomes of patients with perforated gastric cancer according to initial surgical approach - primary perforation repair and one-stage gastrectomy groups, n (%)
Variables
Primary perforation repair, n = 26
One-stage gastrectomy, n = 10
P value
cT1.0
    < T4a14 (53.8)5 (50)
    cT4b12 (46.2)5 (50)
cN0.484
    cN01 (3.8)1 (10)
    cN+5 (96.2)9 (90)
cM0.137
    cM011 (42.3)7 (70)
    cM115 (57.7)3 (30)
cTNM0.324
    ≤ III4 (15.4)2 (20)
    IVA7 (26.9)5 (50)
    IVB15 (57.7)3 (30)
Preoperative chemotherapy0.397
    No19 (73.1)9 (90)
    Yes7 (26.9)1 (10)
Length of hospital stay (days)0.185
    Median (IQR)11 (5-20)13.5 (10-37)
Postoperative complication (Clavien-Dindo)1.000
    0-I-II9 (34.6)3 (30)
    III-V18 (69.2)7 (70)
Clavien V0.260
    No9 (35.6)6 (60)
    Yes17 (65.4)4 (40)
Mortality
    30-day16 (61.5)3 (30)0.139
    90-day17 (65.4)3 (30)0.073
Table 3 Surgical and pathological characteristics of perforated gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy (one- and two-stage approach)
Variables
Gastrectomy, n = 13
%
Previous perforation repair
    Yes323.1
Lymphadenectomy
    D0/D1861.5
    D2538.5
Type of gastrectomy
    Subtotal538.5
    Total861.5
Tumor size (cm)5.8 ± 3.7
Invasion
    Lymphatic invasion861.5
    Venous invasion861.5
    Perineural invasion646.2
pT
    pT217.7
    pT3215.4
    pT41076.9
Number of dissected LN23.1 ± 16.7
pN
    pN0538.5
    pN+861.5
pM
    pM01076.9
    pM1323.1
pTNM
    > II115.4
    III861.5
    IV323.1
Table 4 Patient data with two-stage approach: Local repair of perforation following gastrectomy
No
Sex
Age (year)
cTNM
Clavien (local repair)
Interval local repair vs gastrectomy (month)
Type of surgery
pTNM
DFS (month)
OS (month)
Status
1Male68.9T4b N1 M046.4TG D2pT4 pN0 pM01421.6Death
2Male68.5T4b N1 M023.4TG D2pT4 pN1 pM011.620.5Death
3Male39.1T1 N1 M023.5SG D2pT3 pN1 pM053.353.3Alive
Table 5 Univariable and multivariable analysis for overall survival
Overall survival, variablesUnivariable
Multivariable
HR
95%CI
P value
HR
95%CI
P value
Female (vs male)1.470.70-3.070.306---
Age > 65 years (vs < 65 years)0.690.34-1.400.306---
Charlson > 1 (vs CCI 0)1.250.59-2.660.557---
ASA III/IV (vs ASA I/II)1.790.87-3.680.114---
Hemoglobin < 11 g/dL (vs > 11 g/dL)2.411.05-5.520.0371.560.45-5.400.478
Albumin < 3.5 g/dL (vs > 3.5 g/dL)2.351.09-5.070.0291.440.42-4.910.561
cM1 (vs cM0)3.251.41-7.520.0061.430.50-4.090.509
Perforation repair exclusive (vs gastrectomy)3.661.51-8.870.0043.181.15-8.820.026