Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2025; 17(10): 109999
Published online Oct 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i10.109999
Published online Oct 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i10.109999
Table 1 Comparison of baseline data between the two groups, n (%)/(mean ± SD)
| Group | Observation (n = 59) | Control (n = 59) | χ2/t | P value |
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 36 (61.02) | 34 (57.63) | 0.170 | 0.680 |
| Female | 23 (38.98) | 25 (42.37) | ||
| Age (years) | 53.78 ± 6.21 | 53.42 ± 6.35 | 0.311 | 0.756 |
| Tumor diameter (cm) | 6.52 ± 1.36 | 6.45 ± 1.39 | 0.277 | 0.782 |
| Distribution pattern | ||||
| Diffuse type | 23 (38.98) | 22 (37.29) | 0.215 | 0.898 |
| Nodular type | 31 (52.54) | 33 (55.93) | ||
| Block type | 5 (8.47) | 4 (6.78) |
Table 2 Comparison of clinical treatment between the two groups (mean ± SD)
| Group | Emergency time (minutes) | Time of triage (minutes) | Wait time (minutes) | Time to stop bleeding (hours) | Length of stay (days) |
| Observation (n = 59) | 29.58 ± 5.46 | 10.23 ± 2.06 | 4.56 ± 1.69 | 4.32 ± 1.50 | 8.77 ± 2.06 |
| Control (n = 59) | 35.72 ± 8.52 | 12.15 ± 2.84 | 5.28 ± 1.74 | 5.14 ± 1.63 | 10.23 ± 2.84 |
| t | 4.873 | 4.326 | 2.317 | 2.972 | 3.041 |
| P value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.022 | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Table 3 Comparison of respiratory function indexes between the two groups (mean ± SD)
| Group | Degree of blood oxygen saturation; oxygen saturation of blood (%) | Partial pressure of oxygen (mmHg) | ||
| On admission | Emergency intervention was performed 7 days later | On admission | Emergency intervention 48 hours later | |
| Observation (n = 59) | 92.32 ± 0.48 | 98.74 ± 0.61 | 56.38 ± 1.49 | 95.70 ± 1.12 |
| Control (n = 59) | 92.43 ± 0.50 | 96.34 ± 0.87 | 56.57 ± 1.54 | 92.33 ± 1.46 |
| t | 1.243 | 15.249 | 0.715 | 13.742 |
| P value | 0.217 | < 0.001 | 0.476 | < 0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of serological indexes between the two groups (mean ± SD)
| Group | Hb (g/L) | PAB (mg/L) | Alb (mg/L) | |||
| On admission | Emergency intervention was performed 7 days later | On admission | Emergency intervention was performed 7 days later | On admission | Emergency intervention was performed 7 days later | |
| Observation (n = 59) | 92.50 ± 5.26 | 105.76 ± 6.54 | 0.22 ± 0.04 | 0.43 ± 0.05 | 30.54 ± 2.13 | 34.55 ± 2.58 |
| Control (n = 59) | 92.84 ± 5.38 | 101.57 ± 6.02 | 0.23 ± 0.05 | 0.40 ± 0.04 | 30.65 ± 2.20 | 32.64 ± 2.49 |
| t | 0.360 | 3.646 | 1.204 | 3.651 | 0.281 | 4.140 |
| P value | 0.720 | < 0.001 | 0.231 | < 0.001 | 0.779 | < 0.001 |
Table 5 Comparison of complications between the two groups, n (%)
| Group | Re-hemorrhagia | Pyoperitoneum | Infection | Multi-organ dysfunction | Complications (rate) |
| Observation (n = 59) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (1.69) | 1 (1.69) | 0 (0.00) | 2 (3.39) |
| Control (n = 59) | 2 (3.39) | 3 (5.08) | 2 (3.39) | 1 (1.69) | 8 (13.56) |
| χ2 | - | - | - | - | 6.061 |
| P value | - | - | - | - | 0.014 |
Table 6 Comparison of emergency intervention satisfaction between the two groups, n (%)
| Group | Very satisfied | Fairly satisfied | Dissatisfied | Satisfaction (rate) |
| Observation (n = 59) | 32 (54.24) | 24 (40.68) | 3 (5.08) | 56 (94.92) |
| Control (n = 59) | 22 (37.29) | 27 (45.76) | 10 (16.95) | 49 (83.05) |
| χ2 | - | - | - | 5.943 |
| P value | - | - | - | 0.015 |
- Citation: Ma JF, Jin L, Sha L, Li HF, Qian XY, Wang HY. Shock index and early warning score in liver cancer rupture shock. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(10): 109999
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i10/109999.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i10.109999
