BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2025; 17(10): 109999
Published online Oct 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i10.109999
Table 1 Comparison of baseline data between the two groups, n (%)/(mean ± SD)
Group
Observation (n = 59)
Control (n = 59)
χ2/t
P value
Sex
    Male36 (61.02) 34 (57.63)0.1700.680
    Female23 (38.98) 25 (42.37)
Age (years)53.78 ± 6.2153.42 ± 6.350.3110.756
Tumor diameter (cm) 6.52 ± 1.366.45 ± 1.390.2770.782
Distribution pattern
    Diffuse type23 (38.98) 22 (37.29) 0.2150.898
    Nodular type31 (52.54) 33 (55.93)
    Block type5 (8.47) 4 (6.78)
Table 2 Comparison of clinical treatment between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Group
Emergency time (minutes)
Time of triage (minutes)
Wait time (minutes)
Time to stop bleeding (hours)
Length of stay (days)
Observation (n = 59)29.58 ± 5.4610.23 ± 2.064.56 ± 1.694.32 ± 1.508.77 ± 2.06
Control (n = 59)35.72 ± 8.5212.15 ± 2.845.28 ± 1.745.14 ± 1.6310.23 ± 2.84
t4.8734.3262.3172.9723.041
P value< 0.001< 0.0010.0220.0040.003
Table 3 Comparison of respiratory function indexes between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Group
Degree of blood oxygen saturation; oxygen saturation of blood (%)
Partial pressure of oxygen (mmHg)
On admission
Emergency intervention was performed 7 days later
On admission
Emergency intervention 48 hours later
Observation (n = 59)92.32 ± 0.4898.74 ± 0.6156.38 ± 1.4995.70 ± 1.12
Control (n = 59)92.43 ± 0.5096.34 ± 0.8756.57 ± 1.5492.33 ± 1.46
t1.24315.2490.71513.742
P value0.217< 0.0010.476< 0.001
Table 4 Comparison of serological indexes between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Group
Hb (g/L)
PAB (mg/L)
Alb (mg/L)
On admission
Emergency intervention was performed 7 days later
On admission
Emergency intervention was performed 7 days later
On admission
Emergency intervention was performed 7 days later
Observation (n = 59) 92.50 ± 5.26105.76 ± 6.540.22 ± 0.040.43 ± 0.0530.54 ± 2.1334.55 ± 2.58
Control (n = 59)92.84 ± 5.38101.57 ± 6.020.23 ± 0.050.40 ± 0.0430.65 ± 2.2032.64 ± 2.49
t0.3603.6461.2043.6510.2814.140
P value0.720< 0.0010.231< 0.0010.779< 0.001
Table 5 Comparison of complications between the two groups, n (%)
Group
Re-hemorrhagia
Pyoperitoneum
Infection
Multi-organ dysfunction
Complications (rate)
Observation (n = 59) 0 (0.00) 1 (1.69) 1 (1.69) 0 (0.00) 2 (3.39)
Control (n = 59)2 (3.39) 3 (5.08) 2 (3.39) 1 (1.69) 8 (13.56)
χ2----6.061
P value----0.014
Table 6 Comparison of emergency intervention satisfaction between the two groups, n (%)
Group
Very satisfied
Fairly satisfied
Dissatisfied
Satisfaction (rate)
Observation (n = 59) 32 (54.24) 24 (40.68) 3 (5.08) 56 (94.92)
Control (n = 59)22 (37.29) 27 (45.76) 10 (16.95) 49 (83.05)
χ2---5.943
P value---0.015