Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2025; 17(10): 105360
Published online Oct 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i10.105360
Published online Oct 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i10.105360
Table 1 Patients and disease characteristics of the studied groups
| Group A | Group B | P value | ||||
| mean ± SD/n | Range/% | mean ± SD/n | Range/% | |||
| Age in years | 60.1 ± 8.0 | 50-85 | 60.3 ± 7.9 | 48-75 | 0.410 | |
| Gender | Male | 36 | 75 | 32 | 80 | 0.823 |
| Female | 12 | 25 | 8 | 20 | ||
| ECOG performance status | 1 | 28 | 58.30 | 24 | 60 | 0.867 |
| 2 | 20 | 41.70 | 16 | 40 | ||
| Hypertension | No | 36 | 75 | 34 | 85 | 0.335 |
| Yes | 12 | 25 | 6 | 15 | ||
| Diabetes | No | 34 | 70.8 | 30 | 75 | 0.276 |
| Yes | 14 | 29.2 | 10 | 25 | ||
| Hepatitis C virus | No | 8 | 16.7 | 12 | 30 | 0.392 |
| Yes | 40 | 83.30 | 28 | 70 | ||
| CHILD status | A | 48 | 100 | 40 | 40 | 0.956 |
| Extent of disease | Bilobar | 20 | 41.7 | 32 | 80 | 0.712 |
| Unilobular | 28 | 58.3 | 8 | 20 | ||
| Degree of liver cirrhosis | Cirrhosis | 44 | 91.70 | 15 | 75 | 0.128 |
| Not known | 4 | 8.30 | 5 | 25 | ||
| Baseline number of lesions | 1 | 26 | 54.20 | 28 | 70 | 0.503 |
| 2 | 22 | 45.80 | 10 | 25 | ||
| 3 | 0 | 0.00 | 2 | 5 | ||
| Baseline size of lesion (cm) | 4.7 ± 0.9 | 3.0 ± 6.5 | 5.2 ± 1.1 | 3.5 ± 7.0 | ||
Table 2 Post treatment outcomes among studied groups
| Indicator | Group A | Group B | P value |
| CR (%) | 54.5 | 75.0 | 0.012 |
| PR (%) | 36.4 | 15.0 | 0.008 |
| SD (%) | 9.1 | 7.0 | 0.045 |
| Mean AFP after SBRT (ng/mL) | 176.5 ± 35.0 | 18.4 ± 4.5 | 0.003 |
| Mean ALP after SBRT (U/L) | 120.0 ± 20.0 | 90.0 ± 15.0 | 0.007 |
| Mean ALT after SBRT (U/L) | 45.0 ± 10.0 | 30.0 ± 5.0 | 0.005 |
| Mean AST after SBRT (U/L) | 50.0 ± 12.0 | 35.0 ± 6.0 | 0.006 |
| Mean GGT after SBRT (U/L) | 60.0 ± 15.0 | 40.0 ± 8.0 | 0.004 |
| Mean bilirubin after SBRT (mg/dL) | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.009 |
| Mean platelets after SBRT (103/μL) | 200 ± 40 | 220 ± 30 | 0.021 |
| Mean WBC after SBRT (103/μL) | 6.0 ± 1.0 | 5.5 ± 0.8 | 0.034 |
| Mean hemoglobin after SBRT (g/dL) | 12.0 ± 1.5 | 13.0 ± 1.0 | 0.015 |
Table 3 Predictive analysis of recurrence risk: Cox hazard regression findings among study participants
| Univariate | Multivariate | |||||
| P value | HR | 95%CI of HR | P value | HR | 95%CI of HR | |
| Age (years) | 0.095 | 1.02 | 0.98-1.09 | 0.372 | 1.03 | 0.98-1.08 |
| SBRT (yes) | < 0.001 | 0.12 | 0.02-0.28 | 0.002 | 0.08 | 0.02-0.34 |
| Baseline AFP (ng/dL) | 0.005 | 1 | 1-1.02 | 0.068 | 1 | 1-1.02 |
| Baseline size of lesion (cm) | 0.238 | 0.85 | 0.57-1.16 | 0.285 | 0.83 | 0.58-1.19 |
| Baseline number of lesions | 0.975 | 1.02 | 0.50-2.05 | |||
| Number of affected lobes (bilobular) | 0.825 | 0.92 | 0.46-1.90 | |||
| CR after TACE | 0.430 | 0.45 | 0.05-3.65 | |||
- Citation: Chen L, Wang L, Wang H. Comparison of stereotactic body radiotherapy following transcatheter arterial chemoembolization vs transcatheter arterial chemoembolization alone in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(10): 105360
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i10/105360.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i10.105360
