Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Dec 27, 2024; 16(12): 3675-3684
Published online Dec 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i12.3675
Published online Dec 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i12.3675
Table 1 General clinical data of patients, n (%)/mean ± SD
| UC (n = 313) | Non-UC (n = 313) | t/χ2 | P value | |
| Age | 42.50 ± 13.94 | 41.84 ± 13.71 | 0.590 | 0.556 |
| Sex | 0.058 | 0.810 | ||
| Male | 176 (56.23) | 173 (55.27) | ||
| Female | 137 (43.77) | 140 (44.73) | ||
| Nationality | 29.344 | < 0.001 | ||
| Han | 159 (50.8) | 225 (71.88) | ||
| Ethnic minorities | 154 (49.2) | 88 (28.12) | ||
| Education level | 2.334 | 0.127 | ||
| Low and middle education | 183 (58.47) | 164 (52.40) | ||
| Higher education | 130 (41.53) | 149 (47.60) | ||
| Region of residence | 8.395 | 0.004 | ||
| Urban | 214 (68.37) | 246 (78.59) | ||
| Rural | 99 (31.63) | 67 (21.41) | ||
| Smoking history | 6.157 | 0.013 | ||
| Smoking | 58 (18.53) | 84 (26.84) | ||
| No smoking | 255 (81.47) | 229 (73.16) | ||
| Drinking history | 10.102 | 0.001 | ||
| Drinking | 43 (13.74) | 74 (23.64) | ||
| No drinking | 270 (86.26) | 239 (76.36) | ||
| History of appendectomy | 37.541 | < 0.001 | ||
| Appendectomized | 43 (13.74) | 3 (0.96) | ||
| Nonappendectomized | 270 (86.26) | 310 (99.04) |
Table 2 Comparison of blood routine results between ulcerative colitis and non-ulcerative colitis, median (25th-75th percentiles)
| UC (n = 313) | Non-UC (n = 313) | Z | P value | |
| WBC (× 109/L) | 6.96 (5.41-9.08) | 5.81 (4.91-7.19) | -5.980 | < 0.001 |
| Neutrophile granulocyte (× 109/L) | 4.15 (3.04-5.97) | 3.16 (2.51-4.12) | -7.319 | < 0.001 |
| Lymphocyte (× 109/L) | 1.77 (1.37-5.97) | 2.01 (1.66-2.45) | 4.778 | < 0.001 |
| Monocytes (× 109/L) | 0.52 (0.38-0.69) | 0.40 (0.32-0.52) | -7.385 | < 0.001 |
| RBC (× 1012/L) | 4.42 (3.93-4.80) | 4.53 (4.16-4.95) | 3.449 | < 0.001 |
| Hb (g/L) | 128.00 (108.75-143.00) | 138.00 (125.00-152.00) | 6.348 | < 0.001 |
| PLT (× 109/L) | 277.50 (211.75-350.25) | 230.00 (193.00-264.00) | -6.733 | < 0.001 |
| NLR | 2.38 (1.62-3.68) | 1.55 (1.20-2.07) | -9.520 | < 0.001 |
| PLR | 154.00 (120.64-219.67) | 111.91 (91.11-143.25) | -9.251 | < 0.001 |
Table 3 Blood routine factors influencing incipient ulcerative colitis
| β | SE | Wald | P value | OR | 95%CI | ||
| Lower limit | Upper limit | ||||||
| WBC | 0.121 | 0.104 | 1.361 | 0.243 | 1.129 | 0.921 | 1.383 |
| Neutrophile Granulocyte | -0.043 | 0.112 | 0.148 | 0.701 | 0.958 | 0.769 | 1.193 |
| Lymphocyte | -0.452 | 0.317 | 2.026 | 0.155 | 0.637 | 0.342 | 1.186 |
| Monocytes | 2.775 | 0.670 | 17.146 | 0.000 | 16.039 | 4.312 | 59.653 |
| RBC | 0.296 | 0.252 | 1.384 | 0.239 | 1.345 | 0.821 | 2.204 |
| Hb | -0.026 | 0.007 | 12.238 | 0.001 | 0.975 | 0.961 | 0.989 |
| PLT | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.056 | 0.812 | 1.001 | 0.996 | 1.005 |
| NLR | 0.260 | 0.238 | 1.196 | 0.274 | 1.297 | 0.814 | 2.066 |
| PLR | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.764 | 0.382 | 1.003 | 0.996 | 1.010 |
| Constant | -0.154 | 0.879 | 0.031 | 0.861 | 0.858 | ||
Table 4 Comparison of onset age, scope of lesions, and degree of disease activity between male and female with ulcerative colitis, n (%)/mean ± SD
| Male (n = 176) | Female (n = 137) | t/χ2 | P value | |
| Onset age | 42.46 ± 13.75 | 42.54 ± 14.24 | -0.50 | 0.96 |
| Scope of lesions | 4.90 | 0.09 | ||
| E1 | 17 (9.66) | 25 (18.25) | ||
| E2 | 66 (37.50) | 46 (33.57) | ||
| E3 | 93 (52.84) | 66 (48.18) | ||
| Degree of disease activity | 2.29 | 0.52 | ||
| Clinical remission | 6 (3.41) | 2 (1.46) | ||
| Mild | 29 (16.48) | 29 (21.17) | ||
| Moderate | 112 (63.64) | 82 (59.85) | ||
| Severe | 29 (16.48) | 24 (17.52) |
Table 5 Comparison of onset age of different sexes between appendectomized group and nonappendectomized group, mean ± SD
| Appendectomized | Non-appendectomized | t value | P value | |
| Onset age | 49.51 ± 14.16 | 41.38 ± 13.61 | -3.621 | <0.001 |
| Onset age of male | 50.52 ± 13.95 | 41.37 ± 13.40 | -2.903 | 0.004 |
| Onset age of female | 48.55 ± 14.62 | 41.39 ± 13.94 | -2.188 | 0.029 |
Table 6 Age comparison of confirmed ulcerative colitis between two groups, n (%)
| Onset age | Appendectomized | Non-appendectomized | χ2 | P value |
| 10-19 | 0 (0.00) | 15 (5.56) | 2.509 | 0.113 |
| 20-29 | 3 (6.98) | 49 (18.15) | 3.342 | 0.068 |
| 30-39 | 7 (16.28) | 54 (20.00) | 0.327 | 0.567 |
| 40-49 | 12 (27.91) | 82 (30.37) | 0.107 | 0.743 |
| 50-59 | 13 (30.23) | 44 (16.30) | 4.837 | 0.028 |
| ≥ 60 | 8 (18.60) | 26 (9.63) | 3.086 | 0.079 |
Table 7 Comparison of clinical data between two groups, n (%)/mean ± SD
| Appendectomized (n = 43) | Non-appendectomized (n = 270) | t/χ2 | P value | |
| Age | 49.51 ± 14.16 | 41.38 ± 13.61 | -3.621 | < 0.001 |
| Sex | 1.107 | 0.293 | ||
| Male | 21 (48.84) | 155 (57.41) | ||
| Female | 22 (51.16) | 115 (42.59) | ||
| Nationality | 7.716 | 0.007 | ||
| Han | 30 (69.77) | 129 (47.78) | ||
| Ethnic minorities | 13 (30.23) | 141 (52.22) | ||
| Region of residence | 7.202 | 0.007 | ||
| Urban | 37 (86.05) | 177 (65.56) | ||
| Rural | 6 (13.95) | 93 (34.44) | ||
| Education level | 0.509 | 0.476 | ||
| Low and middle education | 23 (53.49) | 160 (59.26%) | ||
| Higher education | 20 (46.51) | 110 (40.74%) | ||
| Smoking history | 0.167 | 0.682 | ||
| Smoking | 7 (16.28) | 51 (18.89) | ||
| No smoking | 36 (83.72) | 219 (81.11) | ||
| Drinking history | 1.923 | 0.166 | ||
| Drinking | 3 (6.98) | 40 (14.81) | ||
| No drinking | 40 (93.02) | 230 (85.19) | ||
| Degree of disease activity | 48.739 | < 0.001 | ||
| Clinical remission | 4 (9.3) | 4 (1.48) | 9.109 | 0.003 |
| Mild | 22 (51.16) | 36 (13.33) | 35.162 | < 0.001 |
| Moderate | 16 (37.21) | 178 (65.93) | 12.981 | < 0.001 |
| Severe | 1 (2.33) | 52 (19.26) | 7.562 | 0.006 |
| Scope of lesions | 21.631 | < 0.001 | ||
| E1 | 13 (30.23) | 29 (10.74) | 12.130 | < 0.001 |
| E2 | 21 (48.84) | 91 (33.70) | 3.697 | 0.055 |
| E3 | 9 (20.93) | 150 (55.56) | 17.793 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Cui M, Shi C, Yao P. Protective effect of appendectomy against the onset of ulcerative colitis: A case-control study. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16(12): 3675-3684
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v16/i12/3675.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i12.3675
