Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2026; 18(3): 115767
Published online Mar 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i3.115767
Published online Mar 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i3.115767
Figure 1 The graph illustrates the difference in alpha diversity between the control and multi-disciplinary team groups.
aP < 0.05, control vs multi-disciplinary team. MDT: Multi-disciplinary team.
Figure 2 Psychological well-being scores in control and multi-disciplinary team groups.
aP < 0.05, control vs multi-disciplinary team. The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale was used to assess anxiety and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for depression was used to assess depression. A: Depression score reduction; B: Anxiety score reduction. MDT: Multi-disciplinary team.
Figure 3 Comparison of immunological indicators between multi-disciplinary team and control group.
aP < 0.05, control vs multi-disciplinary team. A: Albumin level; B: Total protein; C: Prealbumin; D: Transferrin. MDT: Multi-disciplinary team.
Figure 4 Detailed outcome measures of immune function.
aP < 0.05, control vs multi-disciplinary team. A: CD4+ T cells; B: CD8+ T cells; C: Regulatory T cells. MDT: Multi-disciplinary team.
- Citation: Zhou Q, Xu JD. Traditional Chinese and Western multidisciplinary team approach for gut microbiome recovery postintestinal stoma closure. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(3): 115767
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i3/115767.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i3.115767
