BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Case Report
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 27, 2025; 17(9): 109952
Published online Sep 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.109952
Figure 1
Figure 1 Imaging manifestations. A: Endoscopic images of the lesion before endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD); B: Magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging images of the lesion before ESD; C: Endoscopic images after ESD; D: Photographs of longitudinal sections of the gross appendix specimen; E: Endoscopic images of longitudinal sections of the gross appendix specimen; F and G: Magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging images of longitudinal sections of the gross appendix specimen; H: Endoscopic images 1 year after laparoscopic appendectomy showed no signs of recurrence.
Figure 2
Figure 2 The final pathology of the endoscopic submucosal dissection. A: Photomicrograph ileocecal laterally spreading tumor (haematoxylin and eosin, original magnification × 20); B: Photomicrograph tubular adenoma of the appendix (haematoxylin and eosin, original magnification × 20).
Figure 3
Figure 3  Timeline of diagnosis and treatment.