Clinical effect of enhanced recovery after surgery based on multidisciplinary collaboration model in postoperative gastric cancer surgery

Figure 1 Comparison of gastrointestinal function recovery between the two groups. After the nursing intervention, the study group (n = 60) had shorter recovery times for defecation time, bowel sound recovery time and flatus time compared to the control group (n = 60). ^aP < 0.05.

Figure 2 Comparison of Hamilton Anxiety Scale and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores between the two groups after nursing intervention in control group (n = 60) and study group (n = 60). ^aP < 0.05. HAMA: Hamilton Anxiety Scale; HAMD: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.

Figure 3 Comparison of Short Form 36 Health Survey scores between the two groups of patients before and after nursing intervention in control group (n = 60) and study group (n = 60). A: Control group; B: Study group. SF-36: Short Form 36 Health Survey.

Figure 4 Comparison of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores and total scores after surgery between the two groups in control group (n = 60) and study group (n = 60). A: Comparison of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores between the two groups; B: The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index total scores were compared between the two groups. ^bP < 0.01. PSQI: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.

Figure 5 Comparison of postoperative complications and nursing satisfaction between the two groups. A: Comparison of postoperative complications between the two groups [control group (n = 60), study group (n = 60)]. The postoperative complication rate in the study group was 3.3% (2/60), which was significantly lower than that in the control group [11.7% (7/60), P < 0.01]; B: Comparison of nursing satisfaction between the two groups [control group (n = 60), study group (n = 60)]. The satisfaction rate with care in the study group was 96.7% (58/60), which was higher than that in the control group [78.3% (47/60), P < 0.05]. ^aP < 0.05, ^bP < 0.01.