Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2025; 17(10): 108930
Published online Oct 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i10.108930
Published online Oct 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i10.108930
Figure 1 Literature screening flowchart.
CNKI: China National Knowledge Infrastructure; VIP: VIP Information; RCT: Randomized controlled trial.
Figure 2
Risk of bias chart for included studies.
Figure 3 Gastrointestinal function recovery.
A: Forest plot of time to first flatus; B: Forest plot of length of hospital stay; C: Forest plot of hospitalization cost. CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 4 Time to drainage tube removal.
A: Forest plot of nasogastric tube removal time; B: Forest plot of urinary catheter removal time; C: Forest plot of abdominal drain removal time. CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 5 Incidence of complications.
A: Forest plot of overall complication rate; B: Forest plot of intestinal obstruction incidence; C: Forest plot of nausea and vomiting incidence; D: Forest plot of anastomotic leakage incidence; E: Forest plot of surgical site infection incidence; F: Forest plot of urinary tract infection incidence; G: Forest plot of pulmonary infection incidence. CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 6 Funnel plot of complication rates.
A: Forest plot of hospitalization time; B: Funnel plot of hospitalization cost; C: Funnel plot of complication rates. MD: Mean difference; SMD: Standardized mean difference; OR: Odds ratio.
- Citation: Li HY, Liu Y, Cui WX, Zhao Q. Enhanced recovery after surgery in gastric cancer surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative indwelling drainage tube use. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(10): 108930
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i10/108930.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i10.108930
