Published online May 27, 2016. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i5.353
Peer-review started: October 21, 2015
First decision: December 28, 2015
Revised: January 7, 2016
Accepted: March 7, 2016
Article in press: March 9, 2016
Published online: May 27, 2016
Processing time: 210 Days and 22.5 Hours
Serum albumin has traditionally been used as a quantitative measure of a patient’s nutritional status because of its availability and low cost. While malnutrition has a clear definition within both the American and European Societies for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition clinical guidelines, individual surgeons often determine nutritional status anecdotally. Preoperative albumin level has been shown to be the best predictor of mortality after colorectal cancer surgery. Specifically in colorectal surgical patients, hypoalbuminemia significantly increases the length of hospital stay, rates of surgical site infections, enterocutaneous fistula risk, and deep vein thrombosis formation. The delay of surgical procedures to allow for preoperative correction of albumin levels in hypoalbuminemic patients has been shown to improve the morbidity and mortality in patients with severe nutritional risk. The importance of preoperative albumin levels and the patient’s chronic inflammatory state on the postoperative morbidity and mortality has led to the development of a variety of surgical scoring systems to predict outcomes efficiently. This review attempts to provide a systematic overview of albumin and its role and implications in colorectal surgery.
Core tip: Although albumin remains a flawed marker of nutrition, it offers clear prognostic value in predicting patient outcomes after colorectal surgery. Hypoalbuminemia significantly influences the length of hospital stay, rates of surgical site infections, enterocutaneous fistula risk, and deep vein thrombosis formation. Despite the fact that hypoalbuminemia is classically defined < 3.0 g/dL, clinical judgment must account for albumin levels ≤ 3.4 g/dL as even modest hypoalbuminemia can affect outcomes. The subjective global assessmen, modified Glasgow Prognostic Score, and Colorectal preoperative Surgical Score scoring systems provide convenient and valuable prognostic information that may help in the counseling and risk adjustment of patients undergoing colorectal surgery.