BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Apr 27, 2026; 18(4): 115864
Published online Apr 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i4.115864
Detection rates, sensitivity, and specificity of multislice spiral computed tomography, 1.5T and 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging in anal fistula diagnosis
Jing-Jing Tang, Ting-Hong Wang, Xiao-Feng Jia
Jing-Jing Tang, Ting-Hong Wang, Xiao-Feng Jia, Department of Medical Imaging, Nanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210000, Jiangsu Province, China
Author contributions: Tang JJ was responsible for study design, data collection and organization, statistical analysis, and leading the drafting and revision of the initial manuscript; Wang TH assisted in data verification, literature retrieval, and figure/table preparation, and participated in manuscript proofreading and providing feedback on revisions; Jia XF coordinated the overall progress of the study, reviewed the research protocol and results of data analysis, revised the final version of the manuscript, and undertook the academic communication work after submission and publication. All authors critically reviewed and provided final approval of the manuscript, and responsible for the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Institutional review board statement: This study was reviewed and approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Nanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine (Approval No. FLY17011).
Informed consent statement: All study participants and their legal guardians provided written informed consent prior to study enrolment.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Data sharing statement: No additional data are available.
Corresponding author: Xiao-Feng Jia, Associate Chief Physician, Department of Medical Imaging, Nanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine, No. 157 Daming Road, Nanjing 210000, Jiangsu Province, China. 18951750755@163.com
Received: November 25, 2025
Revised: December 26, 2025
Accepted: February 4, 2026
Published online: April 27, 2026
Processing time: 149 Days and 22.1 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Anal fistula is a common acquired anorectal disorder characterized by an abnormal epithelialized tract connecting the anal canal or rectum to the perianal skin, typically secondary to perianal abscesses, Crohn’s disease, trauma, or infection. Clinically, it presents with recurrent perianal pain, swelling, purulent discharge, and skin irritation, which severely impair patients’ quality of life and may lead to complications such as complex fistula formation, anal incontinence, or even pelvic sepsis if misdiagnosed or inadequately managed.

AIM

To comparing the diagnostic value of multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT), 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and 3.0T MRI for anal fistula.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 119 patients with anal fistula admitted to Nanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine between May 2017 and December 2023 and categorized into three groups based on diagnostic modality: MSCT group (n = 25), 1.5T MRI group (n = 45), and 3.0T MRI group (n = 49). Kappa tests were applied to assess diagnostic agreement between each group and surgical findings (gold standard). Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and Youden indices for detecting internal openings, main tracts, and abscesses were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

Using surgical findings as the reference standard, 3.0T MRI demonstrated significantly higher internal opening and primary fistula tract detection rate (94.54% and 96.43%, respectively) than 1.5T MRI and MSCT (P < 0.05). The diagnostic accuracy of 3.0T MRI for internal openings and primary tracts reached 96.25% and 97.50%, respectively, with excellent agreement with surgical findings (Kappa = 0.911-0.926). In addition, 3.0T MRI showed superior sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and Yorden index in diagnosing internal openings, fistula tracts, and abscesses than MSCT and 1.5T MRI (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with MSCT and 1.5T MRI, 3.0T MRI demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for anal fistula, exhibiting superior diagnostic performance.

Keywords: Anal fistula; Multislice spiral computed tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Diagnosis; Anorectal disease

Core Tip: This study compared diagnostic efficacy of multislice spiral computed tomography, 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and 3.0T MRI for anal fistula in 119 patients. With surgery as gold standard, 3.0T MRI showed significantly higher detection rates, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and consistency with surgery for internal openings/main tracts than multislice spiral computed tomography and 1.5T MRI, proving its superior diagnostic value.