Schiano di Visconte M, Sarnari S. Beyond stapled transanal rectal resection vs ventral rectopexy dichotomy: Toward a phenotype-guided surgical paradigm for obstructed defecation syndrome. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(2): 116100 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.116100]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Michele Schiano di Visconte, MD, Chief, Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases Center, Department of General Surgery, Azienda ULSS2 “Marca Trevigiana”, Via Sant’Ambrogio in Fiera 37, Treviso 31100, Veneto, Italy. mschianodivisconte@gmail.com
Research Domain of This Article
Surgery
Article-Type of This Article
Opinion Review
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Feb 27, 2026 (publication date) through Feb 26, 2026
Times Cited of This Article
Times Cited (0)
Journal Information of This Article
Publication Name
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
ISSN
1948-9366
Publisher of This Article
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Share the Article
Schiano di Visconte M, Sarnari S. Beyond stapled transanal rectal resection vs ventral rectopexy dichotomy: Toward a phenotype-guided surgical paradigm for obstructed defecation syndrome. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(2): 116100 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.116100]
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2026; 18(2): 116100 Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.116100
Beyond stapled transanal rectal resection vs ventral rectopexy dichotomy: Toward a phenotype-guided surgical paradigm for obstructed defecation syndrome
Michele Schiano di Visconte, Sonia Sarnari
Michele Schiano di Visconte, Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases Center, Department of General Surgery, Azienda ULSS2 “Marca Trevigiana”, Treviso 31100, Veneto, Italy
Sonia Sarnari, Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases Center, Azienda ULSS2 “Marca Trevigiana”, Treviso 31100, Veneto, Italy
Co-first authors: Michele Schiano di Visconte and Sonia Sarnari.
Author contributions: Schiano di Visconte M and Sarnari S contributed equally to the conception and design of the study, interpretation of data, and drafting or critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; both authors approved the final version for publication and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of this study.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Corresponding author: Michele Schiano di Visconte, MD, Chief, Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases Center, Department of General Surgery, Azienda ULSS2 “Marca Trevigiana”, Via Sant’Ambrogio in Fiera 37, Treviso 31100, Veneto, Italy. mschianodivisconte@gmail.com
Received: November 2, 2025 Revised: November 18, 2025 Accepted: December 11, 2025 Published online: February 27, 2026 Processing time: 116 Days and 6.8 Hours
Abstract
Obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) is a heterogeneous pelvic floor disorder in which a persistent focus on “stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) vs ventral rectopexy (VR)” has encouraged procedure-driven rather than phenotype-guided care. This opinion review synthesizes contemporary evidence on STARR and VR and proposes a phenotype-guided algorithm for surgical decision-making in ODS. We first summarize comparative outcome data, highlighting higher rates of late recurrence and urgency after STARR in contrast to more durable functional relief but greater invasiveness and mesh-related concerns after VR. We then outline a structured preoperative workup that integrates symptom scores, fluoroscopic or magnetic resonance defecography, and high-resolution anorectal manometry to discriminate between isolated structural disease, complex multilevel prolapse, functional defecatory disorders, mixed phenotypes, and ODS with impaired continence or excessive perineal descent. For each phenotype, we discuss the optimal role of STARR, VR, perineal resections, pelvic organ prolapse suspension, neuromodulation, and transverse perineal support within staged, multimodal pathways. Finally, we identified research priorities, including stratified randomized trials and phenotype-indexed multicenter registries, to validate this algorithm and refine the indications. Reframing ODS management around phenotyping, rather than procedural dichotomies, may improve patient selection, reduce functional failure, and align pelvic floor surgery with a broader movement toward precision medicine.
Core Tip: The management of obstructed defecation syndrome must evolve beyond the suboptimal dichotomy of stapled transanal rectal resection vs ventral rectopexy. This review advocates for a fundamental paradigm shift toward a phenotype-guided stratified treatment algorithm. Mandatory preoperative phenotyping, integrating advanced imaging and high-resolution anorectal manometry, is crucial for classifying patients into distinct structural and functional subtypes. This personalized approach optimizes patient selection and yields superior, durable functional outcomes, thereby establishing a new framework for precision pelvic floor surgery.