BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Diabetes. Jan 15, 2026; 17(1): 110502
Published online Jan 15, 2026. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v17.i1.110502
Table 1 Biomarkers can be categorized based on the renal compartment or pathological process they primarily reflect
Biomarker
Source
Diagnostic accuracy
Clinical significance and validation status
Prospective
Contras and limitations
uACR/albuminuriaGlomerular capillary wallAUC: 0.522[18]-0.933[19]; sensitivity 77% and specificity 92% for microabuminuria; sensitivity 88% and specificity 90% for macroalbuminuria[20]Standard early marker for DKD; persistent elevation indicates nephropathyWidely used; inexpensive, reproducibleAffected by blood pressure, exercise, and infections (risk of false positives). DKD may be normoalbuminuric normal uACR and albuminuria do not always exclude DKD
GPC-5Podocyte injuryROC curve of urinary GPC-5/creatinine ratio comparing T2DM without nephropathy and those with nephropathy reveals a sensitivity of 93.3% and a specificity of 80%[21]Emerging marker of podocyte damage; may reflect early glomerular dysfunction in DKD; more studies needed to validate it as a diagnostic tool of incipient nephropathyPotential early marker of podocyte injury; non-invasive detection in urineLimited validation (small sample size studies); clinical utility and standardization not yet established
TransferrinLarge protein leakage from the glomerular wallAUC: 0.846 (95%CI: 0.810-0.882); sensitivity 69.8%, specificity 90.1% (for a cut-off value of 1.15)[22]Suggests early glomerular barrier compromise before albuminuria. Since significant transferrin levels have been found in normoalbuminuric T2DM patients, it could be suitable as a marker of early-stage DKD; nevertheless, very limited body of researchEarlier than macroalbuminuria; non-invasiveLimited specificity (false positives in primary glomerulonephritis and hypertension in nondiabetic populations; elevated in other proteinuric states)
Immunoglobulins (IgG and IgM)Large protein leakage from the glomerular wallAUC: 0.894 (95%CI: 0.848-0.930); sensitivity 75.53%, specificity 92.31% (for a cut-off value of 8.56)[23]Indicates severe dysfunction. Limited body of evidence in T2DMIndicative of more advanced damage; could be used in combination with transferrin to enhance diagnostic valuesMay be negative until late stages of disease (due to high molecular weight of IgG). Testing is more invasive on the one hand, and insufficiently standardized on the other
NephrinPodocyte injuryNot available for DKDPromising marker for detection of early glomerular injury in multiple studies[24]Specific to podocyte injury; early detection possibleIt does not predict early renal dysfunction in DKD[40]. Requires specialized assays, limited availability
Type IV collagenMatrix remodeling at the glomerular basement membraneAUC not consistently reported; significantly elevated in early DKD[25]. More sensitive than microalbuminuria but exact percentages not uniformly availableAssociated with structural glomerular damage and fibrosis. Validated in large multicentric cohort across DKD stages. Some promising data, but more investigation on larger scale is neededReflects chronic structural damage, therefore useful to detect fibrosisLimited validation (small-to-moderate sample size studies; lack of ROC quantification and cut-offs)[26,30]. Limited utility in early DKD, overlaps with other markers
PodocalyxinPodocyte injuryAUC: 0.86 (95%CI: 0.81-0.91) alone; combined with α2-MG: AUC: 0.88 (95%CI: 0.83-0.93)[27], in another small study, AUC: 0.996[29]. Sensitivity 73.3%, specificity 93.3% at cut-off 43.8 ng/mL[28]Linked to detachment and loss of podocytes. Validated in cross-sectional and prospective cohorts of 42-200 patients[27]. Might be a highly accurate biomarker of early podocyte injury, but more studies on larger scale are neededSensitive for podocyte detachment, useful in active diseaseNot widely validated (limited sample size studies)[27,29]; inter-assay variability; requires advanced laboratory methods
Table 2 Summary of urinary tubular biomarkers important in the diagnosis of diabetic kidney disease
Biomarker
Source
Diagnostic accuracy
Clinical significance
Validation status
Prospective
Contras
NGALProximal and distal tubular stress injuryAUC: 0.88 (0.84-0.90); sensitivity 0.82, specificity 0.81[57]Early marker of tubular injury; predictive of nephropathy before albuminuriaLarger-scale, standardized prospective studies are needed to implement uNGAL as a biomarker into routine clinical useDetects injury before traditional biomarkers; non-invasive and stable in urineNot specific for DKD; elevated in infections or AKI; limited validation (small sample size studies only, high heterogeneity among studies in terms of results and methodologies)
KIM-1Proximal tubular injuryAUC: 0.85 (0.82-0.88); sensitivity 0.68, specificity 0.83[58]Sensitive marker of early tubular injury in DKD; correlates with disease progressionSome promising data, but whether it can be used as a new marker for diagnosing DKD needs further investigationHighly specific for proximal tubular damage; FDA-qualified for nephrotoxicityLimited data in T1DM; limited validation (high heterogeneity between studies in terms of results and methodologies)
L-FABPLipid metabolism and proximal tubular stressAUC: 0.97 (0.94-1.00); sensitivity 100%, specificity 86.67%[59]Reflects oxidative and lipid-induced tubular damageAvailable research seems to highlight high predictive power even compared to other urinary markers including microalbuminuria, but more studies are necessary in order to validate it as a standard biomarkerSensitive to oxidative stress and useful for early diagnosisAffected by diet and comorbidities (false positives); requires special assays; limited validation (small sample size studies only, high heterogeneity among studies in terms of results and methodologies)
MCP-1Inflammatory chemokine secreted by monocytes and macrophagesAUC: 0.546 (0.453-0.638); sensitivity 67.3%, specificity 50.0%[60]Correlates with tubulointerstitial inflammation and progression of DKDMay not be sufficient as a standalone diagnostic marker for DKDCorrelates with inflammation and disease activity; useful in prognosisModerate sensitivity; poor-to-fair discrimination. Levels can fluctuate widely depending on the extent of kidney damage and the presence of inflammatory stimuli
Cystatin CProximal tubular functionAUC: 0.807 (0.741-0.873) sensitivity, 70.9%; specificity, 86.3%[61,62]Indicates proximal tubular dysfunction; used in conjunction with serum cystatin CAlthough not specifically approved as a stand-alone biomarker for DKD, it is well recognized as a valuable marker of kidney function and for assessment of overall kidney health, including in the context of DKDNon-invasive, standardized assays availableAffected by inflammation, corticosteroids, thyroid dysfunction and infections (false positives); not highly specific
CreatinineMuscle metabolism and tubular functionAUC: 0.604-0.8[63]Used to normalize other urinary biomarkers; reflects kidney filtration but not specificLimited diagnostic value alone; rarely used; not FDA approvedReadily available, useful for comparative purposesNot specific or sensitive for kidney damage (it reflects filtration rather than damage); limited diagnostic value alone
Fe MgTubular magnesium handlingNo data on AUC, sensitivity, or specificityEarly sign of tubular reabsorption impairmentMay not be sufficient and specific as a diagnostic biomarker of DKDPotential early tubular dysfunction marker; measurable in clinical laboratoriesLack of standardization, diagnostic accuracy data, and large-scale validation (limited sample sizes, no established cut-offs)
AngiotensinogenRAAS activityNo data on AUC, sensitivity, or specificityReflects intrarenal RAAS activity; elevated in DKD and hypertensionuAGT remains a candidate “theragnostic” biomarker predicting response to RAAS inhibition; further rigorous studies are needed to determine its potential diagnostic role in DKDCorrelates with DKD severity; reflects RAAS dysregulationValues can be influenced by sex hormones (false positives). Overlap with systemic RAAS activation; requires careful interpretation. Lack of external validation (lack of diagnostic accuracy data, small sample size studies)
PeriostinTubular fibrosisAUC: 0.78 (0.71-0.86); sensitivity 80.7%, specificity 43.3% (for a cut-off value of 1.01 ng/mg Cr)[64]Associated with tubular injury and fibrosis; elevated in early DKDStill sparse, although consistent body of research regarding its role as an early biomarker of DKDReflects fibrotic transformation early; may guide interventionsEmerging marker; limited clinical validation and availability (small and cross-sectional studies). Role not clear in early DKD
UromodulinThick ascending limb healthRegarding the ability to discriminate between patients with DKD and patients with CKD without diabetes, AUC-ROC for the urinary glycated uromodulin (glcUMOD) resulted in 0.715 (0.597-0.834)[65]; urinary uromodulin with an AUC of 0.81 (sensitivity 80%, specificity 60%) and exosomal UMOD gene expression with an AUC of 0.95 (sensitivity 92%, specificity 84%) are elevated in early DKD[66]Lower levels associated with increased mortality risk and DKD progressionglcUMOD could represent a novel biomarker for DKD; determination of the clinical value of glcUMOD requires further studyInverse association with outcomes; not expressed in damage; potentially protective markerNot a direct damage marker; interpretation depends on clinical context; the limited research has focused on its translational modification (glcUMOD)
EGFTubular epithelial regenerationRegarding the association between lower uEGF to creatinine ratio with new-onset eGFR < 60 mL/minute per 1.73 m2: In T2DM normoalbuminuric patients: AUC-ROC: 0.85 (0.81-0.90)[67] Involved in tubular repairLow uEGF to creatinine ratio could serve as a biomarker of progressive renal function deterioration in normoalbuminuric patientsInverse marker (lower levels predict DKD progression); decreases before clinical deteriorationNot routinely measured, lack of sufficient validation
VDBPVitamin D transport, liver and tubular cellsNo data on AUC, sensitivity, or specificity. Significantly elevated in diabetics with normal, micro- and macroalbuminuria compared to controls, in stepwise fashion (SMDs: 1.52, 1.81, and 1.51, respectively; all P < 0.00001)[68]Elevated in DKD; correlates with albuminuria and tubular injuryuVDBP could be a promising tubular injury biomarker but requires formal accuracy studies on larger scaleStrong correlation with DKD progression; measurable with multiplex assaysLack of specificity; also elevated in other renal pathologies (false positives); lack of diagnostic accuracy data and established cut-offs
RBP4Tubular stress, adipocytesAUC: 0.746 (0.659-0.834), sensitivity 84.6%, specificity 62.5%[69]Associated with tubular stress and insulin resistance in DKDPredictive role of urinary RBP4 requires further investigation, with most studies involving circulating/serum RBP4Associated with metabolic stress and insulin resistance; useful in early DKDLimited normative data; influenced by obesity (false positives); it may be complementary in the diagnosis of early DKD
YKL-40Inflammation and remodeling (monocytes and chondrocytes)It seems associated with a greater risk of kidney function decline and mortality on a limited male cohort[70]Elevated in DKD; linked to mortality and inflammationSerum/plasma YKL-40 predictive power of early DKD has been validated by multiple studiesRise relevant in DKDEmerging marker, lacks widespread validation