BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Basic Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Diabetes. Dec 15, 2025; 16(12): 111789
Published online Dec 15, 2025. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i12.111789
Table 1 Comparison of wound healing rate
Group
Wound healing rate (%)
Day 7
Day 14
Control (n = 5)45.58 ± 5.8382.76 ± 3.06
Model (n = 5)18.32 ± 1.62a24.54 ± 3.09a
FSC (n = 5)39.08 ± 5.63a,b69.08 ± 3.48a,b
Control + Lip-1 (n = 5)44.94 ± 2.7479.64 ± 4.59
Model + Lip-1 (n = 5)35.46 ± 3.04a,b64.92 ± 5.82a,b
FSC + Lip-1 (n = 5)42.54 ± 5.21b,c73.94 ± 3.27a,b,c
F27.84140.2
P value< 0.0001< 0.0001
Table 2 Comparison of the number of new blood vessels in rat wound tissue
Group
Number of new blood vessels
Control (n = 5)22.60 ± 1.14
Model (n = 5)6.20 ± 0.84a
FSC (n = 5)18.60 ± 2.07a,b
Control + Lip-1 (n = 5)22.40 ± 2.30
Model + Lip-1 (n = 5)16.60 ± 2.07a,b
FSC + Lip-1 (n = 5)20.80 ± 1.30a,b,c
F64.71
P value< 0.0001
Table 3 Comparison of basic fibroblast growth factor and CD31 expression in rat wound tissue
Group
Positive rate of bFGF (%)
Positive rate of CD31 (%)
Control (n = 5)30.40 ± 3.5021.78 ± 1.15
Model (n = 5)12.88 ± 0.97a8.92 ± 0.64a
FSC (n = 5)23.88 ± 4.18a,b15.38 ± 1.18a,b
Control + Lip-1 (n = 5)29.56 ± 2.2620.30 ± 0.76
Model + Lip-1 (n = 5)20.66 ± 3.63a,b13.50 ± 1.18a,b
FSC + Lip-1 (n = 5)26.76 ± 1.70b,c17.44 ± 0.96a,b,c
F24.81110.3
P value< 0.0001< 0.0001
Table 4 Comparison of ferroptosis-related indexes in rat wound tissue
Group
Iron ion (μg/g)
MDA (mmol/g)
GSH (μmol/g)
Control (n = 5)0.04 ± 0.013.10 ± 0.284.15 ± 0.36
Model (n = 5)0.27 ± 0.01a6.95 ± 0.31a2.00 ± 0.08a
FSC (n = 5)0.16 ± 0.02a,b4.80 ± 0.22a,b2.84 ± 0.22a,b
Control + Lip-1 (n = 5)0.04 ± 0.022.99 ± 0.133.94 ± 0.09
Model + Lip-1 (n = 5)0.20 ± 0.03a,b5.08 ± 0.09a,b2.66 ± 0.12a,b
FSC + Lip-1 (n = 5)0.07 ± 0.02a,b,c4.09 ± 0.07a,b,c3.10 ± 0.14a,b,c
F118.0253.488.36
P value< 0.0001< 0.0001< 0.0001