Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Diabetes. Oct 15, 2025; 16(10): 111813
Published online Oct 15, 2025. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i10.111813
Published online Oct 15, 2025. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i10.111813
Table 1 Fracture risk estimates from the key cohort/meta-analyses of type 1 diabetes mellitus and type 2 diabetes mellitus patients
Ref. | Design and population | Sample size | Fracture endpoint | Effect estimate (95%CI) | Diabetes type |
Emanuelsson et al[29] | United Kingdom Biobank + Copenhagen, Mendelian randomization + observational study | 507428 | Fragility fracture | T1DM: HR = 1.50 (95%CI: 1.19-1.88); T2DM: HR = 1.22 (95%CI: 1.13-1.32) | T1DM; T2DM |
Zoulakis et al[1] | Swedish elderly female cohort study | 3008 | Any fracture | HR = 1.26 (95%CI: 1.04-1.54) | T2DM |
Champakanath et al[6] | University of Colorado CACTI cohort | 1416 | Osteoporotic fracture | HR = 1.08 (95%CI: 1.02-1.04) | T1DM |
Table 2 Three metabolic pathways of bone matrix advanced glycation end-product formation and their rate-limiting determinants
Pathway | Key steps | Products/intermediates | Rate-limiting determinants |
Classical Maillard reaction | Glucose reacts with epsilon-amino group of lysine, Schiff base, Amadori rearrangement, early Amadori products | Fructosamine, 1-deoxy-1-ketofructose | Blood glucose concentration, temperature, pH |
Glyco-oxidative stress | ROS/RNS oxidize sugars or Amadori products, carboxylated side chains | CML, CEL and other “oxidative AGEs” | ROS levels, antioxidant defenses |
Carbonyl stress/dicarbonyl pathway | Glucose autoxidation, degradation or lipid peroxidation, MGO, GO, 3-DG, conjugation with lysine/arginine | MG-H1, glucosepane, pentosidine | Glyoxalase-1 activity, glutathione pool |
Table 3 Classification and representative structures of advanced glycation end-products
AGE type | Chemical name | Characteristics | Biological activity |
CML | CML | One of the most common AGEs; formed via glycoxidation or lipid peroxidation | RAGE agonist; promotes inflammation and fibrosis |
CEL | CEL | Structurally similar to CML; derived from pyruvate and other metabolic intermediates | Associated with insulin resistance |
Pentosidine | Crosslink product of reducing sugars with lysine or arginine | Signature structure of AGE crosslinks | Strongly associated with bone fragility and arterial stiffness |
MG-H1 | MG-H1 | Key biomarker of diabetes-related AGE | Promotes apoptosis and mitochondrial dysfunction |
Table 4 Comparison of advanced glycation end product detection techniques in bone tissue and their application limitations
Method | Minimum sample size | Spatial resolution | Absolute quantification | Major advantages | Limitations | Ref. |
HPLC-FLD/LC-MS | 2 mg defatted bone powder | Yes | High sensitivity; can differentiate CML/CEL/MG-H1/Pen | Destructive; requires acid hydrolysis; labor-intensive | [62] | |
Autofluorescence (Ex 335/Em 385) | 5 μm tissue section | Micron level | No (relative) | Rapid, high-throughput; suitable for biopsy screening | Interference from mineral/Lipid autofluorescence; cannot distinguish AGE types | [63] |
Raman spectroscopy | Applicable to both in vivo and tissue sections | Approximately 1 μm | No (semiquantitative) | In situ detection; simultaneously captures mineral-matrix information | Sensitive to water; spectrum interpretation requires expertise | [64] |
Nano-FTIR/AFM-IR | 10 μm tissue section | 20-50 nm | No (semiquantitative) | Highest spatial resolution; enables single-fiber localization | Expensive equipment; limited scanning area | [65] |
Table 5 Research progress on anti-glycation compounds
Intervention | Model and type | Dosage and duration | Evaluation indicators | Summary of main findings | Ref. |
Aminoguanidine (AGE formation inhibitor) | db/db genetic T2DM mice (in vivo) | 100 mg/kg/day, intraperitoneal injection, 8 weeks (estimated) | Femoral BMD, microarchitecture, biomechanical strength | Reduced AGE accumulation in bone matrix; increased BMD and trabecular number; significantly improved 3-point bending load | [8] |
Pyridoxamine (AGE formation inhibitor) | STZ-induced T1DM bone defect model (in vivo); MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts (in vitro) | 1 g/L in drinking water for 4 weeks; 50-500 μM for cells | Bone defect CT imaging, histology; ALP activity | Accelerated bone defect healing; increased bone density in defect site within 7-14 days; rescued MGO-induced ALP suppression in vitro | [91] |
Metformin (AGE inhibition/antihyperglycemic) | db/db T2DM mice (in vivo) | 200 mg/kg/day, oral gavage, 12 weeks (estimated) | Bone volume fraction (BV/TV), biomechanical strength | Increased trabecular bone volume and cortical thickness; improved bending strength; inhibited AGE accumulation in bone | [8] |
ALT-711 (AGE crosslink breaker) | Cy/+ chronic kidney disease rats (diabetic osteoporosis-like, in vivo) | 3 mg/kg/day, intraperitoneal injection, 10 weeks | Bone AGE content, porosity, mechanical strength | Decreased total bone AGE levels and cortical porosity; no significant improvement in biomechanical strength | [104] |
FPS-ZM1 (RAGE small-molecule antagonist) | High-glucose-treated bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (in vitro) | 5 μM for 24 hours | Inflammatory markers (e.g., IL-6), osteogenic markers | Inhibited RAGE and TXNIP/NLRP3 inflammasome; reduced IL-1β and IL-6; upregulated ALP and osteogenic gene expression | [107] |
Silybin (natural flavonolignan) | STZ-induced diabetic rats (in vivo); MC3T3-E1 cells (in vitro) | 50 mg/kg/day intraperitoneal injection, 6 weeks; 100 μM in cells | BMD, bone strength; osteoblast apoptosis rate | Attenuated diabetic bone loss, increased BMD; inhibited AGE-induced apoptosis by downregulating RAGE and mitochondrial pathway | [111] |
Resveratrol (natural polyphenol) | STZ-induced diabetic bone defect model (in vivo) | 10 mg/kg/day oral gavage, 8 weeks | Bone regeneration (μCT), serum AGE levels | Promoted mineralized bone formation in defect site; reduced AGE deposition in bone; improved bone matrix quality | [112] |
Table 6 Relative effects of common antidiabetic medications on fracture risk
Drug class | Effect estimates and 95%CI | Study type | Ref. |
SGLT-2 inhibitors vs placebo | HR = 0.98 (95%CI: 0.70-1.37) | Randomized controlled trial | Perkovic et al[153] |
SGLT-2 inhibitors vs DPP-4 inhibitors | HR = 0.90 (95%CI: 0.73-1.11) | Cohort study | Zhuo et al[17] |
SGLT-2 inhibitors vs GLP-1 RAs | HR = 1.00 (95%CI: 0.80-1.25) | Cohort study | Zhuo et al[17] |
GLP-1 receptor agonists vs placebo | OR = 1.27 (95%CI: 0.88-1.83) | Systematic review/network meta-analysis | Chai et al[157] |
DPP-4 inhibitors vs placebo | RR = 1.44 (95%CI: 1.04-1.98) | Network meta-analysis | Tsai et al[159] |
TZDs (e.g., pioglitazone) vs placebo | RR = 1.21 (95%CI: 1.01-1.45) | Systematic review/meta-analysis | Azhari and Dawson[162] |
- Citation: Li ZP, Luo C, Yu XM, Ye LY, Sun D, Duan CZ, Xu SY, Zeng MQ, Xu H, Peng ZY, Wang P, Wang YB, Ruan WJ, Xue ME, Zhang CJ, He DJ. Diabetic bone fragility through advanced glycation end product-collagen axis: Mechanisms and therapy of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors. World J Diabetes 2025; 16(10): 111813
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v16/i10/111813.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v16.i10.111813