Zhang HZ, Zhang P, Chang GQ, Xiang QY, Cao H, Zhou JY, Dong ZM, Qiao C, Xu CR, Qin Y, Lou PA. Effectiveness of cognitive behavior therapy for sleep disturbance and glycemic control in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A community-based randomized controlled trial in China. World J Diabetes 2021; 12(3): 292-305 [PMID: 33758648 DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v12.i3.292]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Pei-An Lou, Professor, Department of Control and Prevention of Chronic Non-communicable Diseases, Xuzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, No. 142 West Erhuan Road, Xuzhou 221006, Jiangsu Province, China. lpa82835415@126.com
Research Domain of This Article
Health Care Sciences & Services
Article-Type of This Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Diabetes. Mar 15, 2021; 12(3): 292-305 Published online Mar 15, 2021. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v12.i3.292
Table 1 Comparison of cluster levels between the intervention and control groups at baseline, 6 mo, and 12 mo
Variable
Baseline
2 mo
6 mo
12 mo
CBT
Control
χ2/t value
P value
CBT
Control
χ2/t value
P value
CBT
Control
χ2/t value
P value
CBT
Control
χ2/t value
P value
Cluster level (group)
Number of groups
22
22
---
---
22
22
---
---
22
22
---
---
22
22
---
---
Number of participants
10
6
10
1.62
0.45
7
11
1.58
0.45
13
14
1.348
0.51
18
20
0.77
0.38
20
10
7
9
6
7
5
4
2
30
6
5
6
5
1
3
0
0
Number of follow-up general practitioners in each community
≤ 5
6
7
0.55
0.76
6
7
0.55
0.76
6
7
0.553
0.758
6
7
0.55
0.76
6-10
15
13
15
13
15
13
15
13
10-15
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
Table 2 Comparison of baseline characteristics of the intervention and control groups at baseline, 2 mo, 6 mo, and 12 mo
Variable
Baseline
2 mo
6 mo
12 mo
CBT
Control
χ2/t value
P value
CBT
Control
χ2/t value
P value
CBT
Control
χ2/t value
P value
CBT
Control
χ2/t value
P value
Participant number
568
574
---
---
550
559
541
549
---
---
506
527
---
---
Gender (female)
Female
370
383
0.32
0.57
362
376
0.26
0.61
356
370
0.31
0.58
335
367
1.40
0.24
Age (mean + SD)
61.58 ± 9.17
61.83 ± 8.64
-0.46
0.65
61.75 ± 9.12
62.10 ± 8.86
-0.64
0.52
62.48 ± 9.14
62.75 ± 8.71
-0.50
0.62
62.87 ± 9.25
62.74 ± 8.87
0.23
0.82
Educational level
High school and above
53
56
0.42
0.81
51
56
0.38
0.83
47
56
1.09
0.58
41
50
1.00
0.61
Junior high school
240
251
234
243
231
240
208
223
High school and above
275
267
265
260
263
253
257
254
Hypertension
287
287
0.03
0.86
276
278
0.02
0.88
270
272
0.01
0.91
252
262
0.00
0.98
Comorbidities
109
118
0.34
0.56
109
114
0.06
0.81
107
110
0.01
0.92
91
110
1.37
0.24
BMI
24.77± 4.15
25.20± 4.94
-1.60
0.11
24.99 ± 4.48
25.00 ± 4.94
-0.06
0.96
24.71 ± 4.09
25.22 ± 5.01
-1.84
0.07
24.76 ± 4.00
25.28 ± 5.02
-1.84
0.07
Drinking
55
66
0.99
0.32
55
65
0.76
0.38
54
64
0.79
0.37
46
49
0.01
0.91
Smoking
80
92
0.84
0.36
79
88
0.41
0.52
76
86
0.56
0.45
64
69
0.05
0.83
Course of the disease (yr)
5.07 ± 5.25
5.21 ± 4.91
0.56
0.64
5.20 ± 5.06
5.41 ± 5.36
-0.66
0.51
5.53 ± 5.21
5.66 ± 4.76
-0.43
0.67
6.03 ± 5.28
6.20 ± 4.68
-0.52
0.60
Medication
Oral hypoglycemic agents
491
483
1.56
0.46
476
470
1.76
0.42
472
465
1.72
0.42
448
444
5.96
0.05
Insulin
45
49
42
46
39
44
37
43
Oral hypoglycemic agents plus insulin
32
42
32
43
30
40
21
40
GAD-7 score
7.56 ± 5.20
7.58 ± 5.25
-0.04
0.97
7.47 ± 5.23
7.22 ± 5.48
0.76
0.45
7.53 ± 5.65
7.14 ± 5.93
1.10
0.27
7.14 ± 5.68
6.34 ± 5.56
2.27
0.02
PHQ-9 score
7.13 ± 5.53
6.94 ± 5.47
0.59
0.55
7.23 ± 5.36
7.00 ± 5.02
0.73
0.46
7.21 ± 5.48
6.74 ± 5.21
1.44
0.15
7.20 ± 5.45
6.10 ± 4.97
3.39
0.00
Table 3 Baseline characteristics between the completers and non-completers
Variable
Completers
Lost to follow-up
χ2/t value
P value
Intervention group
Control group
χ2/t value
P value
Total
Participant number
1142
62
47
——
——
109
——
——
Gender (Female)
753
35
16
5.39
0.02
51
15.88
< 0.01
Age
62.44 (9.02)
62.95 (7.74)
62.23 (8.51)
0.46
0.65
62.64 (8.05)
-0.22
0.82
Educational level
High school and above
109
12
6
1.03
0.60
18
15.9
< 0.01
Junior high school
491
32
28
60
Elementary school and below
542
18
13
31
Hypertension
574
35
25
0.11
0.74
60
0.91
0.34
Comorbidities
227
18
8
2.12
0.15
26
0.75
0.32
BMI
25.02 (4.17)
24.77 (4.53)
24.43 (4.73)
0.75
0.46
24.62 (4.83)
0.94
0.35
Drinking
121
9
17
6.9
0.009
26
16.87
< 0.001
Smoking
172
16
23
6.22
0.01
39
30.46
< 0.001
Course of the disease (yr)
6.12 (4.98)
5.22 (4.53)
6.14 (5.17)
-1.001
0.32
5.62 (4.81)
1.004
0.32
Medication
Oral hypoglycemic agents
974
43
39
4.74
0.09
82
7.89
0.019
Insulin
94
8
6
14
Oral hypoglycemic agents plus insulin
74
11
2
13
GAD-7 score
6.75 (6.64)
7.31 (4.64)
7.53 (5.94)
-0.22
0.82
7.40 (5.22)
-0.99
0.32
PHQ-9 score
6.63 (5.24)
7.81 (5.39)
6.30 (4.94)
0.78
0.44
6.74 (5.19)
-0.21
0.83
PSQI score
9.45 (2.55)
9.83 (2.73)
9.51 (2.54)
0.64
0.52
9.35 (2.63)
0.39
0.70
HbA1c value
7.36 (1.14)
7.20 (1.31)
7.39 (1.45)
-0.7
0.48
7.28 (1.36)
0.69
0.49
Table 4 Comparison of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores and glycosylated hemoglobin values between the intervention and control groups
Variable
Baseline
2 mo
6 mo
12 mo
Significance level
CBT
UC
CBT
UC
CBT
UC
CBT
UC
Condition
Time
Interaction
PSQI score
10.07 (2.38)
10.04 (2.37)
9.35 (2.79)
9.99(2.41)
9.42 (2.75)
9.92 (2.54)
9.01 (2.67)
9.91 (2.34)
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
HbA1c value
7.44 (1.12)
7.50 (1.13)
7.46 (1.10)
7.50 (1.15)
7.27 (1.18)
7.44 (1.20)
7.22 (1.14)
7.52 (1.12)
< 0.001
0.001
< 0.001
Table 5 Results of intention-to-treat analysis for primary and secondary outcomes
Variable
Baseline
2 mo
6 mo
12 mo
Significance level
CBT
Control
CBT
Control
CBT
Control
CBT
Control
Condition
Time
Interaction
PSQI score
10.07 (2.38)
10.04 (2.37)
9.36 (2.77)
9.92 (2.44)
9.45(2.75)
9.95 (2.59)
9.07 (2.69)
9.94 (2.40)
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
HbA1c value
7.44 (1.12)
7.50 (1.11)
7.46 (1.10)
7.49 (1.15)
7.27 (1.18)
7.44 (1.20)
7.23 (1.17)
7.61 (1.16)
< 0.001
0.028
< 0.001
Citation: Zhang HZ, Zhang P, Chang GQ, Xiang QY, Cao H, Zhou JY, Dong ZM, Qiao C, Xu CR, Qin Y, Lou PA. Effectiveness of cognitive behavior therapy for sleep disturbance and glycemic control in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A community-based randomized controlled trial in China. World J Diabetes 2021; 12(3): 292-305