Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Diabetes. Mar 15, 2021; 12(3): 292-305
Published online Mar 15, 2021. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v12.i3.292
Published online Mar 15, 2021. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v12.i3.292
Table 1 Comparison of cluster levels between the intervention and control groups at baseline, 6 mo, and 12 mo
Variable | Baseline | 2 mo | 6 mo | 12 mo | |||||||||||||
CBT | Control | χ2/t value | P value | CBT | Control | χ2/t value | P value | CBT | Control | χ2/t value | P value | CBT | Control | χ2/t value | P value | ||
Cluster level (group) | |||||||||||||||||
Number of groups | 22 | 22 | --- | --- | 22 | 22 | --- | --- | 22 | 22 | --- | --- | 22 | 22 | --- | --- | |
Number of participants | |||||||||||||||||
10 | 6 | 10 | 1.62 | 0.45 | 7 | 11 | 1.58 | 0.45 | 13 | 14 | 1.348 | 0.51 | 18 | 20 | 0.77 | 0.38 | |
20 | 10 | 7 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||
30 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
Number of follow-up general practitioners in each community | |||||||||||||||||
≤ 5 | 6 | 7 | 0.55 | 0.76 | 6 | 7 | 0.55 | 0.76 | 6 | 7 | 0.553 | 0.758 | 6 | 7 | 0.55 | 0.76 | |
6-10 | 15 | 13 | 15 | 13 | 15 | 13 | 15 | 13 | |||||||||
10-15 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
Table 2 Comparison of baseline characteristics of the intervention and control groups at baseline, 2 mo, 6 mo, and 12 mo
Variable | Baseline | 2 mo | 6 mo | 12 mo | ||||||||||||
CBT | Control | χ2/t value | P value | CBT | Control | χ2/t value | P value | CBT | Control | χ2/t value | P value | CBT | Control | χ2/t value | P value | |
Participant number | 568 | 574 | --- | --- | 550 | 559 | 541 | 549 | --- | --- | 506 | 527 | --- | --- | ||
Gender (female) | ||||||||||||||||
Female | 370 | 383 | 0.32 | 0.57 | 362 | 376 | 0.26 | 0.61 | 356 | 370 | 0.31 | 0.58 | 335 | 367 | 1.40 | 0.24 |
Age (mean + SD) | 61.58 ± 9.17 | 61.83 ± 8.64 | -0.46 | 0.65 | 61.75 ± 9.12 | 62.10 ± 8.86 | -0.64 | 0.52 | 62.48 ± 9.14 | 62.75 ± 8.71 | -0.50 | 0.62 | 62.87 ± 9.25 | 62.74 ± 8.87 | 0.23 | 0.82 |
Educational level | ||||||||||||||||
High school and above | 53 | 56 | 0.42 | 0.81 | 51 | 56 | 0.38 | 0.83 | 47 | 56 | 1.09 | 0.58 | 41 | 50 | 1.00 | 0.61 |
Junior high school | 240 | 251 | 234 | 243 | 231 | 240 | 208 | 223 | ||||||||
High school and above | 275 | 267 | 265 | 260 | 263 | 253 | 257 | 254 | ||||||||
Hypertension | 287 | 287 | 0.03 | 0.86 | 276 | 278 | 0.02 | 0.88 | 270 | 272 | 0.01 | 0.91 | 252 | 262 | 0.00 | 0.98 |
Comorbidities | 109 | 118 | 0.34 | 0.56 | 109 | 114 | 0.06 | 0.81 | 107 | 110 | 0.01 | 0.92 | 91 | 110 | 1.37 | 0.24 |
BMI | 24.77± 4.15 | 25.20± 4.94 | -1.60 | 0.11 | 24.99 ± 4.48 | 25.00 ± 4.94 | -0.06 | 0.96 | 24.71 ± 4.09 | 25.22 ± 5.01 | -1.84 | 0.07 | 24.76 ± 4.00 | 25.28 ± 5.02 | -1.84 | 0.07 |
Drinking | 55 | 66 | 0.99 | 0.32 | 55 | 65 | 0.76 | 0.38 | 54 | 64 | 0.79 | 0.37 | 46 | 49 | 0.01 | 0.91 |
Smoking | 80 | 92 | 0.84 | 0.36 | 79 | 88 | 0.41 | 0.52 | 76 | 86 | 0.56 | 0.45 | 64 | 69 | 0.05 | 0.83 |
Course of the disease (yr) | 5.07 ± 5.25 | 5.21 ± 4.91 | 0.56 | 0.64 | 5.20 ± 5.06 | 5.41 ± 5.36 | -0.66 | 0.51 | 5.53 ± 5.21 | 5.66 ± 4.76 | -0.43 | 0.67 | 6.03 ± 5.28 | 6.20 ± 4.68 | -0.52 | 0.60 |
Medication | ||||||||||||||||
Oral hypoglycemic agents | 491 | 483 | 1.56 | 0.46 | 476 | 470 | 1.76 | 0.42 | 472 | 465 | 1.72 | 0.42 | 448 | 444 | 5.96 | 0.05 |
Insulin | 45 | 49 | 42 | 46 | 39 | 44 | 37 | 43 | ||||||||
Oral hypoglycemic agents plus insulin | 32 | 42 | 32 | 43 | 30 | 40 | 21 | 40 | ||||||||
GAD-7 score | 7.56 ± 5.20 | 7.58 ± 5.25 | -0.04 | 0.97 | 7.47 ± 5.23 | 7.22 ± 5.48 | 0.76 | 0.45 | 7.53 ± 5.65 | 7.14 ± 5.93 | 1.10 | 0.27 | 7.14 ± 5.68 | 6.34 ± 5.56 | 2.27 | 0.02 |
PHQ-9 score | 7.13 ± 5.53 | 6.94 ± 5.47 | 0.59 | 0.55 | 7.23 ± 5.36 | 7.00 ± 5.02 | 0.73 | 0.46 | 7.21 ± 5.48 | 6.74 ± 5.21 | 1.44 | 0.15 | 7.20 ± 5.45 | 6.10 ± 4.97 | 3.39 | 0.00 |
Table 3 Baseline characteristics between the completers and non-completers
Variable | Completers | Lost to follow-up | χ2/t value | P value | ||||
Intervention group | Control group | χ2/t value | P value | Total | ||||
Participant number | 1142 | 62 | 47 | —— | —— | 109 | —— | —— |
Gender (Female) | 753 | 35 | 16 | 5.39 | 0.02 | 51 | 15.88 | < 0.01 |
Age | 62.44 (9.02) | 62.95 (7.74) | 62.23 (8.51) | 0.46 | 0.65 | 62.64 (8.05) | -0.22 | 0.82 |
Educational level | ||||||||
High school and above | 109 | 12 | 6 | 1.03 | 0.60 | 18 | 15.9 | < 0.01 |
Junior high school | 491 | 32 | 28 | 60 | ||||
Elementary school and below | 542 | 18 | 13 | 31 | ||||
Hypertension | 574 | 35 | 25 | 0.11 | 0.74 | 60 | 0.91 | 0.34 |
Comorbidities | 227 | 18 | 8 | 2.12 | 0.15 | 26 | 0.75 | 0.32 |
BMI | 25.02 (4.17) | 24.77 (4.53) | 24.43 (4.73) | 0.75 | 0.46 | 24.62 (4.83) | 0.94 | 0.35 |
Drinking | 121 | 9 | 17 | 6.9 | 0.009 | 26 | 16.87 | < 0.001 |
Smoking | 172 | 16 | 23 | 6.22 | 0.01 | 39 | 30.46 | < 0.001 |
Course of the disease (yr) | 6.12 (4.98) | 5.22 (4.53) | 6.14 (5.17) | -1.001 | 0.32 | 5.62 (4.81) | 1.004 | 0.32 |
Medication | ||||||||
Oral hypoglycemic agents | 974 | 43 | 39 | 4.74 | 0.09 | 82 | 7.89 | 0.019 |
Insulin | 94 | 8 | 6 | 14 | ||||
Oral hypoglycemic agents plus insulin | 74 | 11 | 2 | 13 | ||||
GAD-7 score | 6.75 (6.64) | 7.31 (4.64) | 7.53 (5.94) | -0.22 | 0.82 | 7.40 (5.22) | -0.99 | 0.32 |
PHQ-9 score | 6.63 (5.24) | 7.81 (5.39) | 6.30 (4.94) | 0.78 | 0.44 | 6.74 (5.19) | -0.21 | 0.83 |
PSQI score | 9.45 (2.55) | 9.83 (2.73) | 9.51 (2.54) | 0.64 | 0.52 | 9.35 (2.63) | 0.39 | 0.70 |
HbA1c value | 7.36 (1.14) | 7.20 (1.31) | 7.39 (1.45) | -0.7 | 0.48 | 7.28 (1.36) | 0.69 | 0.49 |
Table 4 Comparison of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores and glycosylated hemoglobin values between the intervention and control groups
Variable | Baseline | 2 mo | 6 mo | 12 mo | Significance level | ||||||
CBT | UC | CBT | UC | CBT | UC | CBT | UC | Condition | Time | Interaction | |
PSQI score | 10.07 (2.38) | 10.04 (2.37) | 9.35 (2.79) | 9.99(2.41) | 9.42 (2.75) | 9.92 (2.54) | 9.01 (2.67) | 9.91 (2.34) | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
HbA1c value | 7.44 (1.12) | 7.50 (1.13) | 7.46 (1.10) | 7.50 (1.15) | 7.27 (1.18) | 7.44 (1.20) | 7.22 (1.14) | 7.52 (1.12) | < 0.001 | 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Table 5 Results of intention-to-treat analysis for primary and secondary outcomes
Variable | Baseline | 2 mo | 6 mo | 12 mo | Significance level | ||||||
CBT | Control | CBT | Control | CBT | Control | CBT | Control | Condition | Time | Interaction | |
PSQI score | 10.07 (2.38) | 10.04 (2.37) | 9.36 (2.77) | 9.92 (2.44) | 9.45(2.75) | 9.95 (2.59) | 9.07 (2.69) | 9.94 (2.40) | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
HbA1c value | 7.44 (1.12) | 7.50 (1.11) | 7.46 (1.10) | 7.49 (1.15) | 7.27 (1.18) | 7.44 (1.20) | 7.23 (1.17) | 7.61 (1.16) | < 0.001 | 0.028 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Zhang HZ, Zhang P, Chang GQ, Xiang QY, Cao H, Zhou JY, Dong ZM, Qiao C, Xu CR, Qin Y, Lou PA. Effectiveness of cognitive behavior therapy for sleep disturbance and glycemic control in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A community-based randomized controlled trial in China. World J Diabetes 2021; 12(3): 292-305
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v12/i3/292.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v12.i3.292