Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Diabetes. Jun 15, 2019; 10(6): 362-375
Published online Jun 15, 2019. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v10.i6.362
Published online Jun 15, 2019. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v10.i6.362
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of participants by quartiles of total vegetable consumption: Tehran lipid and glucose study
Quartiles of total vegetable consumption | P1 value | ||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
Participants, n | 106 | 106 | 106 | 106 | |
Number of components of MetS at baseline, n | |||||
No component | 42 | 45 | 45 | 49 | 0.91 |
1 component | 40 | 41 | 40 | 47 | |
2 components, pre-MetS | 24 | 20 | 21 | 10 | |
Metabolic syndrome after 3.6 yr, n | 17 | 12 | 10 | 8 | |
Age, yr | 13.1 ± 0.3 | 13.3 ± 0.3 | 13.7 ± 0.3 | 13.9 ± 0.3 | 0.31 |
Female, % | 53.8 | 65.1 | 54.7 | 56.6 | 0.32 |
Low physical activity, % | 61 | 73 | 69 | 52 | 0.74 |
Family history of diabetes, % | 4.7 | 8.5 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 0.37 |
BMI, kg/m2 | 19.6 ± 0.4 | 20.7 ± 0.3 | 20.0 ± 0.3 | 19.8 ± 0.3 | 0.18 |
Parental academic degrees, % | 25.2 | 26.9 | 22.8 | 25.2 | 0.48 |
Parental occupational status, employed, % | 83.6 | 87.4 | 81.7 | 82.2 | 0.39 |
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg | |||||
At baseline | 99.1 ± 1.1 | 98.1 ± 1.1 | 96.2 ± 1.1 | 95.0 ± 1.1 | 0.04 |
After 3.6 yr | 101 ± 1.2 | 100.2 ± 2 | 101.2 ± 1.2 | 98.8 ± 1.2 | 0.44 |
Diastolic Blood pressure, mmHg | |||||
At baseline | 65.1 ± 0.9 | 65.0 ± 0.9 | 63.9 ± 0.9 | 64.3 ± 0.9 | 0.76 |
After 3.6 yr | 66.5 ± 0.9 | 68.4 ± 0.9 | 68.2 ± 0.9 | 69.0 ± 0.9 | 0.27 |
Fasting blood glucose, mg/dL | |||||
At baseline | 86.6 ± 0.6 | 84.3 ± 0.6 | 85.1 ± 0.6 | 84.2 ± 0.6 | 0.036 |
After 3.6 yr | 91.8 ± 0.7 | 89.8 ± 0.7 | 89.3 ± 0.7 | 88.9 ± 0.7 | 0.037 |
Serum triglycerides, mg/dL | |||||
At baseline | 78.0 (60.0 – 95.0) | 83.0 (63.0 – 100.0) | 83.0 (64.0 - 103.0) | 78.5 (64.0 - 105.0) | 0.64 |
After 3.6 yr | 79.0 (60.7 – 109.0) | 73.0 (60.0 – 101.0) | 74.0 (60.0 – 96.0) | 77.0 (62.5 - 98.5) | 0.58 |
Serum HDL-C, mg/dL | |||||
At baseline | 45.2± 1.1 | 44.8 ± 1.1 | 44.8 ± 1.1 | 48.5 ± 1.1 | 0.030 |
After 3.6 yr | 50.5 ± 1.2 | 50.0 ± 1.2 | 51.3 ± 1.2 | 55.1 ± 1.2 | 0.014 |
Waist circumference, cm | |||||
At baseline | 67.3 ± 1.0 | 68.2 ± 1.0 | 69.5 ± 1.0 | 70.3 ± 1.0 | 0.16 |
After 3.6 yr | 76.1 ± 1.0 | 77.0 ± 1.0 | 77.9 ± 1.0 | 77.6 ± 1.0 | 0.62 |
Table 2 Baseline dietary intakes of participants by quartiles of total vegetable consumption: Tehran lipid and glucose study
Quartiles of total vegetable consumption | P value | ||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
Fruity vegetables, g/d | 57.5 ± 9.2 | 99.2 ± 9.2 | 156 ± 9.2 | 293 ± 9.2 | < 0.001 |
Root vegetables, g/d | 7.9 ± 1.9 | 14.8 ± 1.9 | 18.7 ± 1.9 | 27.3 ± 1.9 | < 0.001 |
Stalk vegetables, g/d | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 0.002 |
Leafy vegetables, g/d | 19.1 ± 2.3 | 24.2 ± 2.3 | 30.8 ± 2.2 | 44.3 ± 2.4 | < 0.001 |
Potatoes, g/d | 9.7 ± 2.8 | 13.6 ± 2.7 | 17.7 ± 2.7 | 28.8 ± 2.9 | < 0.001 |
Starchy vegetables, g/d | 7.6 ± 1.3 | 8.2 ± 1.2 | 13.4 ± 1.2 | 11.3 ± 1.3 | 0.003 |
Cabbage, g/d | 2.4 ± 1.5 | 5.1 ± 1.4 | 8.6 ± 1.4 | 12.8 ± 1.5 | < 0.001 |
Allium vegetables, g/d | 13.7 ± 2.4 | 18.0 ± 2.3 | 25.3 ± 2.3 | 41.4 ± 2.4 | < 0.001 |
Total energy, Kcal/d | 1981 ± 113 | 2171 ± 113 | 2703 ± 113 | 3383 ± 113 | < 0.001 |
Carbohydrate, % of total energy | 56.5 ± 0.7 | 56.7 ± 0.7 | 57.2 ± 0.7 | 57.3 ± 0.7 | 0.82 |
Protein, % of total energy | 13.2 ± 0.2 | 12.8 ± 0.2 | 13.1 ± 0.2 | 13.4 ± 0.2 | 0.33 |
Fat, % of total energy | 32.4 ± 0.7 | 32.5 ± 0.7 | 32.3 ± 0.7 | 32.1 ± 0.7 | 0.98 |
SFA, % of total energy | 11.4 ± 0.3 | 11.1 ± 0.3 | 10.9 ± 0.3 | 11.1 ± 0.3 | 0.64 |
MUFA, % of total energy | 11.2 ± 0.3 | 11.0 ± 0.3 | 11.2 ± 0.3 | 11.1 ± 0.3 | 0.92 |
PUFA, % of total energy | 6.5 ± 0.2 | 6.6 ± 0.2 | 6.7 ± 0.2 | 6.5 ± 0.2 | 0.90 |
Total fiber, g/d | 27.4 ± 2.4 | 30.5 ± 2.4 | 42.0 ± 2.4 | 49.6 ± 2.4 | < 0.001 |
Cholesterol, g/d | 190 ± 14 | 205 ± 14 | 267 ± 14 | 316 ± 14 | < 0.001 |
Magnesium, mg/d | 301 ± 20 | 324 ± 20 | 433 ± 20 | 547 ± 20 | < 0.001 |
Potassium, mg/d | 2835 ± 171 | 3127 ± 171 | 4228 ± 171 | 5588 ± 171 | < 0.001 |
Whole grain, g/d | 90 ± 16 | 92 ± 16 | 94 ± 16 | 92 ± 16 | 0.251 |
Refined grain, g/d | 356 ± 26 | 354 ± 26 | 359 ± 26 | 351 ± 26 | 0.632 |
Fruit, g/d | 272 ± 31.6 | 308 ± 31.6 | 453 ± 31.6 | 609 ± 31.6 | < 0.001 |
Nuts | 6.9 ± 1.4 | 7.9 ± 1.3 | 9.8 ± 1.3 | 14.5 ± 1.3 | 0.001 |
Legumes | 11.9 ± 2.2 | 12.0 ± 2.2 | 13.9 ± 2.2 | 14.5 ± 2.2 | 0.879 |
Dairy products | 146 ± 39.7 | 517 ± 39.7 | 609 ± 39.7 | 704 ± 39.7 | 0.005 |
Meat, poultry, fish, g/d | 53.8 ± 10.1 | 56.1 ± 10.1 | 59.1 ± 10.1 | 52.7 ± 10.1 | 0.548 |
Table 3 Multivariate adjusted odds ratio (95%CI) for metabolic syndrome across quartiles of total and various types of vegetable consumption: Tehran lipid and glucose study
Quartiles of total- and various types of vegetable consumption | P value forTrend1 | ||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
Total vegetables | |||||
Median intake, g/d | 104 | 179 | 265 | 441 | |
Range of intake, g/d | ≤ 146 | 147-217 | 218-343 | ≥ 350 | |
Model 1 | 1 | 0.66 (0.30-1.47) | 0.54 (0.23–1.25) | 0.42 (0.17–0.92) | 0.06 |
Model 2 | 1 | 0.54 (0.21-1.46) | 0.42 (0.16-1.07) | 0.36 (0.14-0.94) | 0.04 |
Model 3 | 1 | 0.53 (0.20-1.46) | 0.41 (0.15-1.10) | 0.35 (0.13-0.95) | 0.04 |
Allium vegetables | |||||
Median intake, g/d | 2.7 | 10.8 | 22.8 | 51.5 | |
Range of intake, g/d | ≤6.2 | 6.3-17.3 | 17.4-30.5 | ≥ 30.6 | |
Model 1 | 1 | 0.68 (0.31-1.47) | 0.44 (0.19-1.05) | 0.34 (0.13-0.87) | 0.024 |
Model 2 | 1 | 0.55 (0.23-1.31) | 0.27 (0.11-0.74) | 0.21 (0.11-0.64) | 0.006 |
Model 3 | 1 | 0.56 (0.24-1.32) | 0.35 (0.13-0.89) | 0.27 (0.14-0.75) | 0.012 |
Green leafy vegetables | |||||
Median intake, g/d | 9.1 | 17.6 | 27.3 | 54.4 | |
Range of intake, g/d | ≤13.5 | 13.6-21.3 | 21.4-38.3 | ≥ 38.4 | |
Model 1 | 1 | 0.42 (0.18-0.98) | 0.32 (0.13- 0.80) | 0.58 (0.26-1.27) | 0.37 |
Model 2 | 1 | 0.40 (0.16-1.02) | 0.32 (0.12-0.89) | 0.81 (0.32-2.01) | 0.98 |
Model 3 | 1 | 0.42 (0.16-1.11) | 0.40 (0.13-0.91) | 1.12 (0.39-3.19) | 0.51 |
Fruity vegetables | |||||
Median intake, g/d | 42 | 93 | 145 | 263 | |
Range of intake, g/d | ≤ 69 | 70-115 | 116-211 | ≥ 212 | |
Model 1 | 1 | 0.61 (0.25-1.47) | 0.61 (0.25–1.47) | 1.08 (0.49–2.37) | 0.69 |
Model 2 | 1 | 0.65 (0.25-1.65) | 0.64 (0.25-1.65) | 1.01 (0.38-2.68) | 0.34 |
Model 3 | 1 | 0.71 (0.27-1.87) | 0.84 (0.32-2.23) | 1.65 (0.57-4.80) | 0.44 |
Root vegetables | |||||
Median intake, g/d | 2.1 | 7.3 | 10.0 | 34.4 | |
Range of intake, g/d | ≤ 4.2 | 4.3-9.9 | 10.0-21.9 | ≥ 22.0 | |
Model 1 | 1 | 0.57 (0.20-1.64) | 2.23 (0.99-5.03) | 1.11 (0.45-2.74) | 0.89 |
Model 2 | 1 | 0.72 (0.24-2.12) | 1.74 (0.72-4.17) | 1.13 (0.43-2.97) | 0.87 |
Model 3 | 1 | 0.68 (0.22-2.07) | 1.88 (0.75-4.72) | 1.45 (0.50-4.13) | 0.51 |
Stalk vegetables | |||||
Median intake, g/d | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 2.5 | |
Range of intake, g/d | ≤ 0.00 | 0.1-0.5 | 0.6-1.1 | ≥ 1.2 | |
Model 1 | 1 | 0.57 (0.24-1.36) | 0.54 (0.23-1.29) | 0.88 (0.40-1.94) | 0.86 |
Model 2 | 1 | 0.52 (0.20-1.36) | 0.51 (0.20-1.31) | 1.09 (0.46-2.58) | 0.51 |
Model 3 | 1 | 0.61 (0.23-1.62) | 0.57 (0.21-1.51) | 1.32 (0.52-3.34) | 0.34 |
Potatoes | |||||
Median intake, g/d | 2.4 | 10.3 | 20.7 | 36.3 | |
Range of intake, g/d | ≤4.8 | 4.9-10.4 | 10.5-20.8 | ≥ 20.9 | |
Model 1 | 1 | 0.69 (0.32-1.50) | 0.97 (0.41- 2.28) | 0.80 (0.32-1.99) | 0.84 |
Model 2 | 1 | 0.54 (0.23- 1.27) | 0.86 (0.34-2.21) | 0.68 (0.25-1.85) | 0.72 |
Model 3 | 1 | 0.58 (0.23-1.44) | 1.03 (0.38- 2.76) | 0.55 (0.17-1.68) | 0.54 |
Starchy vegetables | |||||
Median intake, g/d | 1.9 | 4.7 | 8.2 | 18.2 | |
Range of intake, g/d | ≤ 3.3 | 3.4-5.8 | 5.-12.6 | ≥ 12.7 | |
Model 1 | 1 | 0.91 (0.39-2.11) | 1.0 (0.44-2.27) | 0.66 (0.27-1.62) | 0.36 |
Model 2 | 1 | 0.92 (0.37-2.31) | 0.93 (0.38-2.26) | 0.60 (0.22-1.62) | 0.29 |
Model 3 | 1 | 0.99 (0.38-2.56) | 0.80 (0.30-2.13) | 0.80 (0.26-2.45) | 0.41 |
Cabbage | |||||
Median intake, g/d | 0.0 | 1.9 | 6.2 | 15.3 | |
Range of intake, g/d | ≤ 0.0 | 0.1 – 3.1 | 3.2-6.2 | ≥ 6.3 | |
Model 1 | 1 | 0.74 (0.36-1.52) | 1.12 (0.40-3.14) | 0.54 (0.21-1.38) | 0.18 |
Model 2 | 1 | 0.79 (0.36-1.71) | 1.25 (0.42-3.79) | 0.51 (0.18-1.45) | 0.07 |
Model 3 | 1 | 0.94 (0.42-2.10) | 1.50 (0.48-4.69) | 0.56 (0.18-1.71) | 0.09 |
Table 4 Multivariable odds ratio (95%CI) for metabolic syndrome based intake of total and various types of vegetable consumption (above/below the medians) among participants with 0, 1, or 2 components of metabolic syndrome at baseline: Tehran lipid and glucose study
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
< median | ≥ median | < median | ≥ median | < median | ≥ median | |
Total vegetables, g/d | ||||||
0 component | 1 | 0.48 (0.12-1.94) | 1 | 0.77 (0.14-4.05) | 1 | 0.82 (0.15-4.29) |
1 component | 1 | 0.68 (0.27-1.71) | 1 | 0.62 (0.21-1.83) | 1 | 0.67 (0.23-1.99) |
2 component | 1 | 1.98 (0.61-6.42) | 1 | 2.00 (0.49-8.18) | 1 | 2.24 (0.53-9.39) |
Allium vegetables | ||||||
0 component | 1 | 0.77 (0.21-2.85) | 1 | 0.69 (0.17-2.76) | 1 | 0.54 (0.12-2.42) |
1 component | 1 | 0.25 (0.08-0.73) | 1 | 0.25 (0.08-0.76) | 1 | 0.23 (0.07-0.71) |
2 component | 1 | 0.49 (0.16-1.52) | 1 | 0.51 (0.15-1.78) | 1 | 0.48 (0.13-1.69) |
Green leafy vegetables | ||||||
0 component | 1 | 0.81 (0.22-2.98) | 1 | 1.04 (0.25-4.26) | 1 | 1.10 (0.25-4.72) |
1 component | 1 | 0.31 (0.11-0.84) | 1 | 0.31 (0.09-0.97) | 1 | 0.29 (0.09-0.95) |
2 component | 1 | 1.01 (0.33-3.08) | 1 | 1.43 (0.39-5.18) | 1 | 1.39 (0.38-5.06) |
Fruity vegetables | ||||||
0 component | 1 | 1.13 (0.31-4.07) | 1 | 1.15 (0.28-4.71) | 1 | 0.88 (0.20-3.84) |
1 component | 0.66 (0.26-1.67) | 1 | 0.60 (0.21-1.69) | 1 | 0.64 (0.22-1.82) | |
2 component | 1.51 (0.48-4.67) | 1 | 2.02 (0.52-7.87) | 1 | 2.11 (0.53-8.32) | |
Root vegetables | ||||||
0 component | 1 | 2.36 (0.59-9.43) | 1 | 2.57 (0.58-11.3) | 1 | 2.31 (0.49-10.7) |
1 component | 1 | 2.20 (0.84-5.76) | 1 | 1.68 (0.61-4.75) | 1 | 1.67 (0.58-4.73) |
2 component | 1 | 1.97 (0.63-6.14) | 1 | 1.48 (0.43-5.08) | 1 | 1.31 (0.36-4.69) |
Stalk vegetables | ||||||
0 component | 1 | 1.28 (0.35-4.72) | 1 | 1.33 (0.33-5.30) | 1 | 1.08 (0.26-4.52) |
1 component | 1 | 0.72 (0.28-1.81) | 1 | 0.73 (0.27-2.00) | 1 | 0.74 (0.27-2.02) |
2 component | 1 | 1.18 (039-3.58) | 1 | 1.09 (0.32-3.76) | 1 | 1.13 (0.32-3.97) |
Potatoes | ||||||
0 component | 1 | 1.36 (0.34-5.45) | 1 | 1.97 (0.39-9.90) | 1 | 2.12 (0.39-11.4) |
1 component | 1 | 0.56 (0.22-1.42) | 1 | 0.45 (0.17-1.22) | 1 | 0.45 (0.16-1.24) |
2 component | 1 | 1.91 (0.55-6.66) | 1 | 1.35 (0.34-5.39) | 1 | 1.55 (0.36-6.65) |
Starchy vegetables | ||||||
0 component | 1 | 0.64 (0.17-2.36) | 1 | 0.92 (0.21-3.90) | 1 | 1.06 (0.24-4.60) |
1 component | 1 | 0.78 (0.31-1.96) | 1 | 0.80 (0.29-2.18) | 1 | 0.84 (0.30-2.32) |
2 component | 1 | 1.08 (0.35-3.30) | 1 | 0.57 (0.15-2.11) | 1 | 0.56 (0.15-2.14) |
Cabbage | ||||||
0 component | 1 | 0.64 (0.13-3.12) | 1 | 0.88 (0.16-4.92) | 1 | 0.89 (0.15-5.08) |
1 component | 1 | 1.19 (0.46-3.07) | 1 | 1.64 (0.59-4.59) | 1 | 1.54 (0.55-4.32) |
2 component | 1 | 0.48 (0.12-1.91) | 1 | 0.53 (0.18-2.43) | 1 | 0.45 (0.09-2.22) |
- Citation: Hosseinpour-Niazi S, Bakhshi B, Betru E, Mirmiran P, Darand M, Azizi F. Prospective study of total and various types of vegetables and the risk of metabolic syndrome among children and adolescents. World J Diabetes 2019; 10(6): 362-375
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v10/i6/362.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v10.i6.362