Letter to the Editor Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Diabetes. Jun 15, 2024; 15(6): 1367-1373
Published online Jun 15, 2024. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v15.i6.1367
Unraveling the biological link between diabetes mellitus and prostate cancer: Insights and implications
Jian Li, Wei Wang, Department of Interventional Oncology, Municipal Hospital Affiliated to Taizhou University, Taizhou 318000, Zhejiang Province, China
Zhi-Peng Li, Si-Si Xu, School of Medicine, Taizhou University, Taizhou 318000, Zhejiang Province, China
ORCID number: Jian Li (0009-0000-5644-555X); Zhi-Peng Li (0000-0002-0355-7889); Si-Si Xu (0009-0001-3737-612X); Wei Wang (0000-0001-5630-3287).
Author contributions: Li J and Li ZP contributed to the validation and writing of the original draft of this manuscript; Xu SS was involved in the formal analysis and software; Wang W participated in the conceptualization, writing, reviewing and editing of this article; all authors participated in drafting the manuscript; and all authors have read, contributed to, and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Wei Wang, MD, Attending Doctor, Department of Interventional Oncology, Municipal Hospital Affiliated to Taizhou University, No. 381-1 Zhongshan East Road, Jiaojiang District, Taizhou 318000, Zhejiang Province, China. westernfox000@163.com
Received: January 26, 2024
Revised: March 15, 2024
Accepted: April 18, 2024
Published online: June 15, 2024
Processing time: 137 Days and 0.9 Hours

Abstract

This article is a comprehensive study based on research on the connection between diabetes mellitus (DM) and prostate cancer (PCa). It investigates the potential role of DM as an independent risk factor for PCa, delving into the biological links, including insulin resistance and hormonal changes. The paper critically analyzes previous studies that have shown varying results and introduces mendelian randomization as a method for establishing causality. It emphasizes the importance of early DM screening and lifestyle modifications in preventing PCa, and proposes future research directions for further under-standing the DM - PCa relationship.

Key Words: Biological mechanisms; Diabetes mellitus; Mendelian randomization; Prevention prostatic cancer; Treatment

Core Tip: The article emphasizes diabetes mellitus (DM) as a potential independent risk factor for prostate cancer (PCa), and delves into the possible biological mechanisms related to both diseases, such as insulin resistance and hormonal changes. The document also reviews existing research, providing an in-depth analysis of the application of mendelian randomization in the context of the relationship between DM and PCa. It underscores the importance of early DM screening and lifestyle interventions in potentially preventing PCa. Furthermore, it highlights the need for future research to further elucidate this complex relationship.



TO THE EDITOR

Diabetes mellitus (DM) and prostate cancer (PCa) are two diseases that pose a serious threat to global health. DM primarily affects blood sugar regulation, while PCa is one of the most common cancers in men[1,2]. With an aging population structure and changes in lifestyle, the incidence of both diseases is on the rise. They not only impose a sub-stantial disease burden on patients, reducing their quality of life, but also may increase the risk of complications and financial strain[3,4].

Currently, there is much debate and discussion in the academic community about the relationship between DM and PCa. In this context, the research paper by Yuan et al[5], employing the mendelian randomization (MR) method to explore the relationship between these two diseases, has captured our interest. This study finds that DM may be an independent risk factor for PCa, providing a new perspective in understanding the connection between these two conditions. Given the high prevalence of DM and PCa, as well as their significant impact on patients and society, in-depth research into the interactions between these two diseases is crucial for developing effective public health strategies and improving treatment outcomes.

POSSIBLE BIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS OF DM LEADING TO PCA

Although the results of the study of Yuan et al[5] suggest that DM may increase the incidence of PCa, the paper does not discuss in detail the possible biological mechanisms. We have delved into the potential associations between DM and PCa. The relationship between DM and PCa is complex, and the scientific community’s understanding of their direct connection is still evolving. Some studies indicate that DM might be associated with a lower risk of PCa, potentially related to lower circulating insulin levels in diabetic patients. However, from a biological perspective, the following are several plausible mechanisms explaining why diabetic patients may have an increased risk of developing PCa (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Figure 1 Possible biological mechanisms of diabetes mellitus leading to prostate cancer. Insulin-like growth factor-1 can encourage cellular proliferation and hinder cell apoptosis, potentially elevating the risk of various cancers, including prostate cancer (PCa). Elevated blood glucose can accelerate cell oxidation and chronic inflammation, both of which are linked to cancer progression. Diabetes mellitus (DM) often coexists with obesity and metabolic syndrome, conditions that are associated with systematic inflammation and hormone imbalance, potentially increasing the risk of PCa. DM can also influence the levels of sex hormones, including testosterone. Altered testosterone levels can influence the risk of PCa. The diet and lifestyle of diabetics may also contribute to an elevated risk of PCa. Additionally, the disease itself and the immune function changes caused by long-term DM may play a role in the development of PCa. IGF: Insulin-like growth factor.
INSULIN RESISTANCE AND INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH FACTORS

Diabetic patients often exhibit insulin resistance, leading to elevated levels of insulin and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) in the body[6,7]. IGF-1 can promote cell proliferation and inhibit apoptosis, potentially increasing the risk of various cancers, including PCa[8,9].

HYPERGLYCEMIC ENVIRONMENT

High blood sugar levels can cause oxidative stress and chronic inflammation in cells, both of which are associated with cancer progression. This low-level chronic inflammation may promote tumor growth[10,11].

OBESITY AND METABOLIC SYNDROME

DM often coexists with obesity and metabolic syndrome, conditions associated with systemic inflammation and hormonal imbalances, which may increase the risk of PCa[12].

SEX HORMONES

DM can affect levels of sex hormones, including testosterone. Changes in testosterone levels may impact the risk of PCa[13].

DIET AND LIFESTYLE

The diet and lifestyle of diabetic patients may be linked to an increased risk of PCa. For example, a high-fat diet and low intake of fruits and vegetables are associated with an increased cancer risk[14,15].

CHRONIC DISEASE STATE AND IMMUNE MODULATION

The disease itself and the immune function changes caused by long-term DM might also be factors in developing PCa[16,17]. It is important to note that these mechanisms may interact with each other and manifest differently in various populations. Moreover, there is still controversy over how DM affects the risk of PCa, with different studies potentially reaching different conclusions. Therefore, more epidemiological and laboratory research is needed to elucidate these potential biological mechanisms.

EXPLORING THE CONTESTED TERRAIN - PREVIOUS RESEARCH INSIGHTS

Research into the relationship between DM and PCa has yielded many inconsistent results, possibly due to the complex interactions between the two conditions and variations in research designs. Some studies have identified DM as a protective factor against PCa[18-20], while others have found DM to be a high-risk factor for PCa[5,21,22] (Table 1).

Table 1 The relationship between diabetes mellitus and prostate cancer.
DM and PCa
Main point
Ref.
DM is a protective factor of PCaThis publication discusses the potential protective effects of diabetes against PCa, focusing on the role of diabetes-related microvascular complicationsZhang and Hu[18], 2010
This article reviews the epidemiological evidence regarding the reduced risk of PCa in diabetic individuals, offering insights into potential mechanismsPierce[19], 2012
This population-based case-control study examines the association between T2DM, antidiabetic medication, and the risk of PCaLin et al[20], 2020
DM is a high-risk factor for PCaThis approach improved the accuracy in estimating the relationship between diabetes and the incidence of PCaYuan et al[5], 2023
The study employed the Cox model and competing risks methods to estimate hazard ratios for various subtypes of PCaPiffoux et al[21], 2021
The study discusses the common risk factors for diabetes and how aspects frequently seen in diabetic patients, such as hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia, impact the risk of developing PCaSousa et al[22], 2022

Firstly, a segment of observational studies has found that men with DM have a lower risk of developing PCa[23]. These studies are typically based on large population samples and consider a variety of potential confounding factors. The results suggest that DM patients may be protected by some mechanism from developing PCa. However, these studies also have limitations. For instance, the diagnosis of DM might be inaccurate or underestimated, especially in studies based on self-reporting. Moreover, these studies may not have adequately considered the severity, duration, or treatment of DM and its impact on the risk of PCa.

On the other hand, research also exists that identifies DM as a high-risk factor for PCa. These studies usually focus on specific patient groups, such as elderly men or men of certain races/ethnicities. The findings suggest that DM might increase the risk of PCa by promoting insulin resistance, chronic inflammation, or changes in sex hormone metabolism. However, these studies, too, have their limitations. For example, they might not have sufficiently considered potential confounding factors such as lifestyle, family history, or other chronic diseases. Additionally, the results of these studies might be influenced by selection bias, as DM patients may undergo medical examinations more frequently, thereby increasing the detection rate of PCa. Overall, this contested terrain in research highlights the complexity of the relationship between DM and PCa, and underscores the need for more nuanced and comprehensive studies to unravel these connections.

UNVEILING NEW HORIZONS - MR METHOD AND INSIGHTFUL FINDINGS

MR is a statistical method that uses genetic variations as instrumental variables to study the causal relationship between an exposure (such as DM) and an outcome (such as PCa). It is based on the principle of Mendel’s laws of genetics, where genotypes are randomly assigned to individuals. This allows researchers to assess the direct impact of an exposure on an outcome, free from confounding factors (Table 2).

Table 2 The commonly used mendelian randomization methods in the analysis of the relationship between diabetes mellitus and prostate cancer.
Analytical method
Method name
Description
Application
Association analysisUnivariable MRUsing a single genetic variant as an instrumental variable to estimate the causal relationship between exposure and outcomeUtilizing specific SNPs associated with the development of DM to assess the risk of PCa in diabetic patients
Multivariable MRSimultaneously using multiple genetic variations as instrumental variables to consider the potential relationships among multiple exposuresUncovering potential common genetic paths between DM and PCa
Two-sample MRAllowing data on exposure and outcome to come from different study populations can increase the sample size, improve statistical power, and reduce the impact of sample selection biasIt can be used to evaluate whether DM increases the risk of PCa
Statistical efficiency analysisReliability analysisExamine the consistency of estimates and stability of different genetic instrumental variablesMR-Egger regression, the weighted median approach, and the leave-one-out cross-validation
Sensitivity analysisAssess the sensitivity of the results to potential confounding factors or violations of instrumental variable assumptions

In the study of the relationship between DM and PCa, three common types of MR methods include univariable MR[24], multivariable MR[24], and two-sample MR[5]. Univariable MR uses a single genetic variant as the instrumental variable to estimate the causal relationship between exposure and outcome. For instance, specific single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with the development of DM could be used to assess the risk of PCa in diabetic patients. Multivariable MR, on the other hand, employs multiple genetic variants as instrumental variables to consider potential relationships among various exposures. This is particularly important for revealing possible common genetic pathways between DM and PCa, helping to isolate the independent effects of each variable and provide a more comprehensive assessment of the causal relationship. Two-sample MR allows data on exposure and outcome to come from different study populations, thus increasing sample size, enhancing statistical power, and reducing the impact of sample selection bias.

Reliability analysis examines the consistency of results across different genetic instrumental variables and their stability[25], while sensitivity analysis assesses the results’ sensitivity to potential confounders or violations of the instrumental variable assumptions[26]. The application of methods like MR-Egger regression, the weighted median approach, and the leave-one-out cross-validation helps identify and correct potential issues, such as insufficient strength or bias of the instrumental variables.

BRIDGING GAPS AND FUTURE TRAJECTORIES

The current limitations of MR studies, such as those on DM and PCa, include potential biases caused by pleiotropy and population stratification. Future research should focus on diversifying the demographic structure of participants to understand how DM affects PCa across different populations. Additionally, the relationship between different subtypes of DM and PCa needs exploration. Future studies must consider both known and unknown confounding factors to more clearly understand the causal effects. While MR studies can partially explain the causal relationship between DM and PCa, further research is necessary to comprehensively explore this complex relationship. Integrating data from diverse populations and various subtypes will enhance our understanding of the DM-PCa connection[27,28].

CONCLUSION

This article discusses the relationship between DM and PCa, emphasizing DM as a potential independent risk factor for PCa. It explores the biological mechanisms linking DM to PCa, such as insulin resistance, hormonal changes, and chronic inflammation. Our review of previous studies demonstrates contradictory results regarding the DM-PCa relationship and introduces the MR method for understanding causality. The study highlights the importance of early DM screening and lifestyle interventions in preventing PCa. Finally, it proposes future research directions, including diversifying participant demographics and investigating different subtypes of DM, to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the DM-PCa link.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the reviewers for their comments that helped to improve the manuscript.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Endocrinology and metabolism

Country of origin: China

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade B

Novelty: Grade B

Creativity or Innovation: Grade A

Scientific Significance: Grade B

P-Reviewer: Gadelkareem RA, Egypt S-Editor: Wang JJ L-Editor: A P-Editor: Chen YX

References
1.  Wang L, Li Y, Ren M, Wang X, Li L, Liu F, Lan Y, Yang S, Song J. pH and lipase-responsive nanocarrier-mediated dual drug delivery system to treat periodontitis in diabetic rats. Bioact Mater. 2022;18:254-266.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22]  [Article Influence: 11.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Liu Z, Zhong J, Zeng J, Duan X, Lu J, Sun X, Liu Q, Liang Y, Lin Z, Zhong W, Wu W, Cai C, Zeng G. Characterization of the m6A-Associated Tumor Immune Microenvironment in Prostate Cancer to Aid Immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 2021;12:735170.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 35]  [Article Influence: 11.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Chen X, Shao Y, Wei W, Zhu S, Li Y, Chen Y, Li H, Tian H, Sun G, Niu Y, Shang Z. Androgen deprivation restores ARHGEF2 to promote neuroendocrine differentiation of prostate cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13:927.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Tzeng TF, Liou SS, Tzeng YC, Liu IM. Zerumbone, a Phytochemical of Subtropical Ginger, Protects against Hyperglycemia-Induced Retinal Damage in Experimental Diabetic Rats. Nutrients. 2016;8.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 25]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 31]  [Article Influence: 3.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Yuan JX, Jiang Q, Yu SJ. Diabetes mellitus and prostate cancer risk: A mendelian randomization analysis. World J Diabetes. 2023;14:1839-1848.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
6.  Li Q, Fu J, Xia Y, Qi W, Ishikado A, Park K, Yokomizo H, Huang Q, Cai W, Rask-Madsen C, Kahn CR, King GL. Homozygous receptors for insulin and not IGF-1 accelerate intimal hyperplasia in insulin resistance and diabetes. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4427.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 28]  [Article Influence: 5.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Su CH, Chen WM, Chen M, Shia BC, Wu SY. Association of Diabetes Severity and Mortality with Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Opoku-Acheampong AB, Baumfalk DR, Horn AG, Kunkel ON, Ganta CK, McCullough DJ, Siemann DW, Muller-Delp J, Behnke BJ. Prostate cancer cell growth characteristics in serum and prostate-conditioned media from moderate-intensity exercise-trained healthy and tumor-bearing rats. Am J Cancer Res. 2019;9:650-667.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
9.  Dickerman BA, Ahearn TU, Giovannucci E, Stampfer MJ, Nguyen PL, Mucci LA, Wilson KM. Weight change, obesity and risk of prostate cancer progression among men with clinically localized prostate cancer. Int J Cancer. 2017;141:933-944.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 28]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30]  [Article Influence: 4.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Jeong HS, Lee DH, Kim SH, Lee CH, Shin HM, Kim HR, Cho CH. Hyperglycemia-induced oxidative stress promotes tumor metastasis by upregulating vWF expression in endothelial cells through the transcription factor GATA1. Oncogene. 2022;41:1634-1646.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Hammer M, Storey S, Hershey DS, Brady VJ, Davis E, Mandolfo N, Bryant AL, Olausson J. Hyperglycemia and Cancer: A State-of-the-Science Review. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2019;46:459-472.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Motterle G, DE Zorzi L, Zecchini G, Mandato FG, Ferraioli G, Bianco M, Zanovello N. Metabolic syndrome and risk of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Panminerva Med. 2022;64:337-343.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Christakoudi S, Tsilidis KK, Evangelou E, Riboli E. Interactions of obesity, body shape, diabetes and sex steroids with respect to prostate cancer risk in the UK Biobank cohort. Cancer Med. 2024;13:e6918.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Wilson KM, Mucci LA. Diet and Lifestyle in Prostate Cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1210:1-27.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 29]  [Article Influence: 7.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Labbé DP, Zadra G, Yang M, Reyes JM, Lin CY, Cacciatore S, Ebot EM, Creech AL, Giunchi F, Fiorentino M, Elfandy H, Syamala S, Karoly ED, Alshalalfa M, Erho N, Ross A, Schaeffer EM, Gibb EA, Takhar M, Den RB, Lehrer J, Karnes RJ, Freedland SJ, Davicioni E, Spratt DE, Ellis L, Jaffe JD, DʼAmico AV, Kantoff PW, Bradner JE, Mucci LA, Chavarro JE, Loda M, Brown M. High-fat diet fuels prostate cancer progression by rewiring the metabolome and amplifying the MYC program. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4358.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 99]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 103]  [Article Influence: 20.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Feng X, Song M, Preston MA, Ma W, Hu Y, Pernar CH, Stopsack KH, Ebot EM, Fu BC, Zhang Y, Li N, Dai M, Liu L, Giovannucci EL, Mucci LA. The association of diabetes with risk of prostate cancer defined by clinical and molecular features. Br J Cancer. 2020;123:657-665.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22]  [Article Influence: 5.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Jian Gang P, Mo L, Lu Y, Runqi L, Xing Z. Diabetes mellitus and the risk of prostate cancer: an update and cumulative meta-analysis. Endocr Res. 2015;40:54-61.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 45]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 47]  [Article Influence: 5.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Zhang W, Hu R. Why does diabetes offer protective effects against prostate cancer? The possible role of its microvascular complications. Med Hypotheses. 2010;74:242-243.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Pierce BL. Why are diabetics at reduced risk for prostate cancer? A review of the epidemiologic evidence. Urol Oncol. 2012;30:735-743.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 42]  [Article Influence: 3.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Lin E, Garmo H, Van Hemelrijck M, Adolfsson J, Stattin P, Zethelius B, Crawley D. Association of type 2 diabetes mellitus and antidiabetic medication with risk of prostate cancer: a population-based case-control study. BMC Cancer. 2020;20:551.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Piffoux M, Eriau E, Cassier PA. Autophagy as a therapeutic target in pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 2021;124:333-344.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 97]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 118]  [Article Influence: 39.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Sousa AP, Costa R, Alves MG, Soares R, Baylina P, Fernandes R. The Impact of Metabolic Syndrome and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Prostate Cancer. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:843458.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Beckmann K, Crawley D, Nordström T, Aly M, Olsson H, Lantz A, Binti Abd Jalal N, Garmo H, Adolfsson J, Eklund M, Van Hemelrijck M. Association Between Antidiabetic Medications and Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels and Biopsy Results. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e1914689.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Gormley M, Dudding T, Sanderson E, Martin RM, Thomas S, Tyrrell J, Ness AR, Brennan P, Munafò M, Pring M, Boccia S, Olshan AF, Diergaarde B, Hung RJ, Liu G, Davey Smith G, Richmond RC. A multivariable Mendelian randomization analysis investigating smoking and alcohol consumption in oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Nat Commun. 2020;11:6071.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 62]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 50]  [Article Influence: 12.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Burgess S, Foley CN, Allara E, Staley JR, Howson JMM. A robust and efficient method for Mendelian randomization with hundreds of genetic variants. Nat Commun. 2020;11:376.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 277]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 301]  [Article Influence: 75.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Zhang B, Huang X, Wang X, Chen X, Zheng C, Shao W, Wang G, Zhang W. Using a two-sample mendelian randomization analysis to explore the relationship between physical activity and Alzheimer's disease. Sci Rep. 2022;12:12976.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Greco M FD, Minelli C, Sheehan NA, Thompson JR. Detecting pleiotropy in Mendelian randomisation studies with summary data and a continuous outcome. Stat Med. 2015;34:2926-2940.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 286]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 297]  [Article Influence: 33.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Smith GD, Ebrahim S. Mendelian randomization: prospects, potentials, and limitations. Int J Epidemiol. 2004;33:30-42.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 623]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 730]  [Article Influence: 36.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]