Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jul 15, 2026; 18(7): 118940
Published online Jul 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i7.118940
Published online Jul 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i7.118940
Table 1 Comparison of clinical data between the two groups, n (%)
| Variable | Construct group (n = 336) | Validation group (n = 144) | χ2/t | P value |
| Age (years), mean ± SD | 68.03 ± 8.45 | 68.15 ± 8.33 | 0.711 | 0.477 |
| Gender | 0.731 | 0.392 | ||
| Male | 194 (57.74) | 76 (52.78) | ||
| Female | 142 (42.26) | 68 (47.22) | ||
| Blood type | 1.140 | 0.767 | ||
| A | 86 (25.60) | 39 (27.08) | ||
| B | 84 (25.00) | 33 (22.92) | ||
| O | 81 (24.10) | 35 (24.31) | ||
| AB | 85 (25.30) | 37 (25.69) | ||
| Diet | 1.454 | 0.228 | ||
| Low-fat and low-cholesterol | 178 (52.98) | 81 (56.25) | ||
| High fat and high cholesterol | 158 (47.02) | 63 (43.75) | ||
| Nature of work | 1.449 | 0.229 | ||
| Brainpower | 123 (36.61) | 48 (33.33) | ||
| Physical strength | 213 (63.39) | 96 (66.67) | ||
| Course of illness (months) | 0.726 | 0.394 | ||
| < 3 | 170 (50.60) | 77 (53.47) | ||
| ≥ 6 | 166 (49.40) | 67 (46.53) | ||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 1.977 | 0.160 | ||
| 20-25 | 243 (72.32) | 109 (75.69) | ||
| ≥ 25 | 93 (27.68) | 35 (24.31) | ||
| Installments | 0.93 | 0.531 | ||
| Phase I-II | 168 (50.00) | 69 (47.92) | ||
| Phase III | 168 (50.00) | 75 (52.08) | ||
| History of hepatitis B | 2.216 | 0.137 | ||
| Have | 83 (24.70) | 29 (20.14) | ||
| None | 253 (75.30) | 115 (79.86) | ||
| ST2 (pg/mL) | 58.92 (44.36, 198.74) | 62.34 (45.88, 215.47) | 1.619 | 0.106 |
| PIVKA-II (mAU/mL) | 45.23 (24.67, 415.78) | 48.15 (26.33, 398.72) | 1.702 | 0.089 |
| CEA (ng/mL) | 8.91 (3.12, 89.45) | 9.45 (3.34, 85.12) | 1.720 | 0.086 |
| CA125 (U/mL) | 31.25 (21.08, 65.44) | 32.17 (22.10, 68.95) | 1.804 | 0.072 |
| Fatty liver | 0.651 | 0.420 | ||
| Have | 60 (17.86) | 30 (20.83) | ||
| None | 276 (82.14) | 114 (79.17) | ||
Table 2 Univariate analysis of liver metastasis in the construct group, n (%)
| Variable | Liver metastasis group (n = 84) | Liver metastasis-free group (n = 252) | χ2/t | P value |
| Age (years), mean ± SD | 67.94 ± 8.51 | 68.07 ± 8.44 | 0.055 | 0.956 |
| Gender | 0.162 | 0.687 | ||
| Male | 50 (59.52) | 144 (57.14) | ||
| Female | 34 (40.48) | 108 (42.86) | ||
| Blood type | 0.380 | 0.944 | ||
| A | 23 (27.38) | 63 (25.00) | ||
| B | 18 (21.43) | 66 (26.19) | ||
| O | 21 (25.00) | 60 (23.81) | ||
| AB | 22 (26.19) | 63 (25.00) | ||
| Diet | 0.726 | 0.394 | ||
| Low-fat and low-cholesterol | 47 (55.95) | 131 (51.98) | ||
| High fat and high cholesterol | 37 (44.05) | 121 (48.02) | ||
| Nature of work | 0.481 | 0.488 | ||
| Brainpower | 34 (40.48) | 89 (35.32) | ||
| Physical strength | 50 (59.52) | 163 (64.68) | ||
| Course of illness (months) | 3.505 | 0.061 | ||
| < 3 | 39 (46.43) | 131 (51.98) | ||
| ≥ 6 | 45 (53.57) | 121 (48.02) | ||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.407 | 0.524 | ||
| 20-25 | 59 (70.24) | 184 (73.02) | ||
| ≥ 25 | 25 (29.76) | 68 (26.98) | ||
| Installments | 0.632 | 0.427 | ||
| Phase I-II | 40 (47.62) | 128 (50.79) | ||
| Phase III | 44 (52.38) | 124 (49.21) | ||
| History of hepatitis B | 0.258 | 0.611 | ||
| Have | 23 (27.38) | 60 (23.81) | ||
| None | 61 (72.62) | 192 (76.19) | ||
| ST2 (pg/mL) | 396.45 (332.18, 472.15) | 49.87 (42.15, 58.64) | 85.077 | < 0.001 |
| PIVKA-II (mAU/mL) | 752.18 (682.34, 830.47) | 28.92 (20.15, 38.74) | 160.464 | < 0.001 |
| CEA (ng/mL) | 320.45 (305.80, 337.22) | 3.52 (2.65, 4.41) | 325.563 | < 0.001 |
| CA125 (U/mL) | 105.67 (92.14, 128.35) | 25.08 (19.87, 31.65) | 63.921 | < 0.001 |
| Fatty liver | 84.183 | < 0.001 | ||
| Have | 40 (47.62) | 20 (7.94) | ||
| None | 44 (52.38) | 232 (92.06) | ||
Table 3 Explanation and values of independent variables in logistic regression analysis
| Variable | Variable description | Assignment status |
| ST2 | Continuous variables | Value |
| PIVKA-II | Continuous variables | Value |
| CEA | Continuous variables | Value |
| CA125 | Continuous variables | Value |
| Fatty liver | Binary variable | Present = 1, absent = 2 |
Table 4 Multivariate analysis of liver metastasis in patients in the construct group
| Variable | Regression coefficient | SE | Wald | P value | OR value | 95%CI |
| ST2 | 1.254 | 0.310 | 16.333 | < 0.001 | 3.503 | 1.958-6.630 |
| PIVKA-II | 1.829 | 0.354 | 26.694 | < 0.001 | 6.220 | 2.951-9.169 |
| CEA | 1.311 | 0.291 | 20.287 | < 0.001 | 3.708 | 2.096-6.559 |
| CA125 | 1.570 | 0.337 | 17.341 | < 0.001 | 4.808 | 2.312-10.054 |
| Fatty liver | 0.765 | 0.283 | 7.287 | 0.007 | 2.148 | 1.233-3.743 |
Table 5 Positive rates of different combinations of soluble growth-stimulating gene 2, protein Induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II, carcinoembryonic antigen, and carbohydrate antigen 125, n (%)
| Project portfolio | Liver metastasis group (n = 84) | Liver metastasis-free group (n = 252) |
| ST2 + PIVKA-II | 35 (41.67) | 5 (1.98) |
| ST2 + CEA | 40 (47.62) | 7 (2.78) |
| ST2 + CA125 | 45 (53.57) | 5 (1.98) |
| PIVKA-II + CEA | 42 (50.00) | 5 (1.98) |
| PIVKA-II + CA125 | 43 (51.19) | 6 (2.38) |
| CEA + CA125 | 41 (48.81) | 6 (2.38) |
| ST2 + PIVKA-II + CEA | 39 (46.43) | 4 (1.59) |
| ST2 + PIVKA-II + CA125 | 37 (44.05) | 5 (1.98) |
| ST2 + CEA + CA125 | 36 (42.86) | 4 (1.59) |
| PIVKA-II + CEA + CA125 | 42 (50.00) | 2 (0.79) |
| ST2 + PIVKA-II + CEA + CA125 | 47 (55.95) | 2 (0.79) |
Table 6 Receiver operating characteristic curves analysis of soluble growth-stimulating gene 2, protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II, carcinoembryonic antigen, and carbohydrate antigen 125 individually and in combination
| Project portfolio | AUC | Optimal cutoff value | Youden index | SE | 95%CI | P value | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) |
| ST2 | 0.641 | 32.48 pg/mL | 0.276 | 0.045 | 0.553-0.729 | 0.003 | 72.46 | 55.19 |
| PIVKA-II | 0.668 | 42.02 mAU/mL | 0.268 | 0.043 | 0.584-0.752 | < 0.001 | 69.48 | 57.30 |
| CEA | 0.650 | 5.81 ng/mL | 0.347 | 0.047 | 0.558-0.742 | 0.001 | 72.91 | 61.75 |
| CA125 | 0.657 | 37.53 U/mL | 0.251 | 0.046 | 0.567-0.747 | < 0.001 | 65.36 | 59.72 |
| ST2 + PIVKA-II | 0.689 | 0.45 | 0.336 | 0.041 | 0.609-0.769 | < 0.001 | 55.42 | 78.14 |
| ST2 + CEA | 0.624 | 0.42 | 0.342 | 0.049 | 0.528-0.720 | < 0.001 | 56.34 | 77.89 |
| ST2 + CA125 | 0.704 | 0.44 | 0.300 | 0.040 | 0.626-0.782 | < 0.001 | 58.44 | 71.53 |
| PIVKA-II + CEA | 0.741 | 0.48 | 0.272 | 0.037 | 0.668-0.814 | 0.004 | 57.16 | 70.06 |
| BEER-II + CA125 | 0.715 | 0.46 | 0.428 | 0.040 | 0.636-0.794 | < 0.001 | 58.67 | 84.11 |
| CEA + CA125 | 0.734 | 0.47 | 0.377 | 0.038 | 0.659-0.809 | 0.002 | 54.96 | 82.74 |
| ST2 + PIVKA-II + CEA | 0.660 | 0.52 | 0.420 | 0.041 | 0.580-0.740 | < 0.001 | 49.37 | 92.66 |
| ST2 + PIVKA-II + CA125 | 0.794 | 0.58 | 0.410 | 0.044 | 0.708-0.880 | < 0.001 | 47.20 | 93.78 |
| ST2 + CEA + CA125 | 0.817 | 0.62 | 0.402 | 0.047 | 0.725-0.909 | < 0.001 | 46.05 | 94.19 |
| PIVKA-II + CEA + CA125 | 0.863 | 0.65 | 0.409 | 0.049 | 0.767-0.959 | < 0.001 | 44.42 | 96.47 |
| ST2 + PIVKA-II + CEA + CA125 | 0.896 | 0.75 | 0.315 | 0.037 | 0.823-0.969 | < 0.001 | 33.04 | 98.42 |
- Citation: Cheng Y, Sun YS, He YM. ST2, PIVKA-II, CEA, CA125 and their combinations in elderly liver metastases cancers: Development of a diagnostic scoring model. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(7): 118940
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v18/i7/118940.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v18.i7.118940