Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jul 15, 2026; 18(7): 118522
Published online Jul 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i7.118522
Published online Jul 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i7.118522
Table 1 Criteria for defining successful conversion and surgical decision-making
| Category | Criterion | Definition/threshold | Assessment method and timing |
| Overall requirement | MDT consensus | Agreement by hepatobiliary surgery, interventional radiology, and oncology | MDT review after every 2 cycles of therapy |
| Radiological response | Objective tumor response | Achieve complete or partial response according to RECIST 11 and/or modified RECIST | Contrast-enhanced CT/magnetic resonance imaging every 6 weeks; response must be confirmed on two consecutive scans ≥ 4 weeks apart |
| Technical resectability | Tumor downstaging to allow for a potential R0 resection. Regression of major vascular involvement (e.g., portal vein tumor thrombus) | Volumetric and anatomical assessment via imaging | |
| Liver function and volume | FLR volume | FLR > 40% of standardized total liver volume | CT volumetry prior to surgical decision |
| Liver function reserve | Child-Pugh score ≤ 7 | Laboratory and clinical evaluation every 3 weeks | |
| ICG 15-minute retention rate ≤ 20% | ICG clearance test prior to surgical decision | ||
| Patient general status | Performance status | Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score: 0-1 | Clinical assessment every 3 weeks |
| Systemic disease control | Extrahepatic metastasis | Absence of new or progressive extrahepatic metastases | Chest CT and baseline extrahepatic imaging every 6 weeks |
| Surgical safety | Major organ function | No severe, uncontrolled comorbidities precluding major surgery (cardiopulmonary, renal insufficiency, etc.) | Comprehensive preoperative anesthesiology evaluation |
Table 2 Baseline characteristics of 38 patients who had primary unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
| Clinical characteristic | Data |
| Sex | |
| Male | 36 |
| Female | 2 |
| Age (years) | |
| ≤ 65 | 32 |
| > 65 | 6 |
| Hepatitis B | |
| Yes | 34 |
| No | 4 |
| Cirrhosis | |
| Yes | 18 |
| No | 20 |
| Antiviral treatment | |
| Yes | 8 |
| No | 30 |
| China Liver Cancers stage | |
| Ia | 1 |
| Ib | 5 |
| IIa | 3 |
| IIb | 1 |
| IIIa | 28 |
| Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage | |
| Early (A) | 6 |
| Intermediate (B) | 4 |
| Advanced (C) | 28 |
| Number of cancer lesions | |
| 1 | 16 |
| ≥ 2 | 22 |
| Sum of longest diameter of target lesions (cm) | |
| ≥ 10 | 23 |
| < 10 | 15 |
| Alpha-fetoprotein (μg/L) | |
| ≥ 400 | 21 |
| < 400 | 17 |
Table 3 Evaluation of effectiveness of conversion therapy (number of cases/percentage)
| Assessment indicators | RECIST | Modified RECIST |
| CR | 3/38 (7.9%) | 5/38 (13.1%) |
| Partial response | 16/38 (42.1%) | 15/38 (39.5%) |
| Stable disease | 18/38 (47.4%) | 17/38 (44.7%) |
| Progressive disease | 1/38 (2.6%) | 1/38 (2.6%) |
| Objective response rate | 19/38 (50.0%) | 20/38 (52.6%) |
| Disease control rate | 37/38 (97.4%) | 37/38 (97.4%) |
| Pathological CR | 3/38 (7.9%) | 3/38 (7.9%) |
| Conversion success rate | 19/38 (50.0%) | 20/38 (52.6%) |
| Surgical conversion rate | 17/38 (44.7%) | 17/38 (44.7%) |
Table 4 Univariate analysis of survival factors in 38 patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, n (%)
| Factors | Survival | Death | Hazard ratio (95%CI) | P value |
| Gender | 0.114 | |||
| Male | 19 (52.8) | 17 (47.2) | Reference | |
| Female | 2 (100) | 0 (0) | 3.297 (0.751-14.479) | |
| Age (years) | 0.725 | |||
| ≤ 65 | 18 (56.3) | 14 (43.7) | Reference | |
| > 65 | 3 (50.0) | 3(50.0) | 0.802 (0.236-2.734) | |
| Hepatitis B | 0.189 | |||
| Negative | 1 (25.0) | 3 (75.0) | Reference | |
| Positive | 20 (58.8) | 14 (41.2) | 3.872 (0.514-29.169) | |
| Liver cirrhosis | 0.935 | |||
| Negative | 11 (55.0) | 9 (45.0) | Reference | |
| Positive | 10 (55.6) | 8 (44.4) | 0.965 (0.41-2.274) | |
| Antiviral therapy | 0.093 | |||
| Negative | 14 (46.7) | 16 (53.3) | Reference | |
| Positive | 7 (87.5) | 1 (12.5) | 2.179 (0.879-5.402) | |
| China Liver Cancers stage | 0.734 | |||
| Ia | 1 (100.0) | 0 | Reference | |
| Ib | 2 (40.0) | 3 (60.0) | 2.863 (0.362-22.623) | 0.319 |
| IIa | 2 (66.7) | 1 (33.3) | 0.495 (0.113-2.172) | 0.351 |
| IIb | 0 | 1 (100.0) | 1.031 (0.236-4.498) | 0.968 |
| IIIa | 16 (57.1) | 12 (42.9) | 0 | 0.983 |
| Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage | 0.337 | |||
| A | 2 (33.3) | 4 (66.7) | Reference | |
| B | 3 (75.0) | 1 (25.0) | 0.397 (0.09-1.746) | 0.222 |
| C | 16 (57.1) | 12 (42.9) | 1.538 (0.442-5.353) | 0.499 |
| Hepatocellular carcinoma lesions | 0.181 | |||
| 1 | 7 (43.7) | 9 (56.3) | Reference | |
| ≥ 2 | 14 (63.6) | 8 (36.4) | 1.886 (0.745-4.776) | |
| Alpha-fetoprotein (μg/L) | 0.696 | |||
| < 400 | 9 (52.9) | 8 (47.1) | Reference | |
| ≥ 400 | 12 (57.1) | 9 (42.9) | 1.188 (0.5-2.823) | |
| Conversion rate | 0.011 | |||
| Fail | 9 (42.9) | 12 (57.1) | Reference | |
| Succes | 12 (70.6) | 5 (29.4) | 0.272 (0.099-0.745) |
Table 5 Multivariate analysis of survival factors in 38 patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
| Factors | β | Wald | Hazard ratio | P value | 95%CI |
| Gender | 0.060 | 0.937-24.376 | |||
| Male | - | - | Reference | ||
| Female | 1.564 | 3.541 | 4.780 | ||
| Hepatitis | 0.107 | 0.691-44.754 | |||
| Negative | - | - | Reference | ||
| Positive | 1.715 | 2.599 | 5.559 | ||
| Antiviral therapy | 0.691 | 0.448-3.359 | |||
| Negative | - | - | Reference | ||
| Positive | 0.205 | 0.159 | 1.227 | ||
| Lesion numbers | 0.461 | 0.518-4.275 | |||
| 1 | - | - | Reference | ||
| ≥ 2 | 0.397 | 0.544 | 1.488 | ||
| Conversion rate | |||||
| Fail | - | - | Reference | ||
| Success | -1.609 | 8.263 | 0.200 | 0.004 | 0.067-0.599 |
- Citation: Chen X, Liao H, Chen J, Peng LH, Zhang JH, Xuyun XX, Chen YJ, Chen T. Lenvatinib and pembrolizumab plus FOLFOX-hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in locally advanced, potentially resectable hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(7): 118522
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v18/i7/118522.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v18.i7.118522