Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jul 15, 2025; 17(7): 105286
Published online Jul 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i7.105286
Table 1 Nutritional risk index comparison between the infection and non-infection groups (mean ± SD)
Group
Cases
Nutritional risk index
Infection group6185.36 ± 2.44
Non-infection group3592.27 ± 1.21
t value15.661
P value0.000
Table 2 Nutritional risk index comparison between patients with mild and severe infections (mean ± SD)
Group
Cases
Nutritional risk index
Mild infection 3689.18 ± 1.56
Severe infection 2583.72 ± 2.18
t value11.413
P value0.000
Table 3 Nutritional risk index comparison between survivors and deceased patients (mean ± SD)
Group
Cases
Nutritional risk index
Survivors4088.72 ± 2.32
Deceased2183.48 ± 1.96
t value8.820
P value0.000
Table 4 Nutritional risk index for predicting the receiver operating characteristic curve parameters of postoperative surgical site infection
Group
Cases
Nutritional risk index (mean ± SD)
Group
Cases
Nutritional risk index
Nutritional risk index6185.36 ± 2.44Infection group6185.36 ± 2.44
Table 5 Nutritional risk index for predicting the receiver operating characteristic curve parameters for postoperative severe surgical site infection
Group
Cases
Nutritional risk index
Group
Cases
Nutritional risk index
Nutritional risk index0.9860.916-1.00091.6796.000.8767
Table 6 Nutritional risk index for predicting the receiver operating characteristic curve parameters for death in patients with postoperative surgical site infection
Group
Cases
Nutritional risk index
Group
Cases
Nutritional risk index
Nutritional risk index0.9490.860-0.98992.5085.710.7821