Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Nov 15, 2025; 17(11): 110468
Published online Nov 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i11.110468
Published online Nov 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i11.110468
Table 1 Advantages and limitations of modalities used in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer
| Methods | Advantages | Limitations | Clinical utility for Ki-67 estimation | Utility in Ki-67 prediction | Validation status |
| US | Easy to use, flexible and intuitive, non-invasive and radiation-free | Difficulty visualizing the entire pancreas | No validated biomarkers | Low | Research-only |
| CT | Excellent spatial and temporal clarity | Inability to diagnose pancreatic lesions accurately | Texture analysis (low entropy excludes high Ki-67 expression)[67] | Moderate | Transitional |
| MRI | Exceptional imaging for depicting local pancreatic disease | Expensive and less widely available | Diffusion restriction (low ADC) predicts high Ki-67 expression for preoperative risk stratification[48,49] | High | Limited clinical use |
| PET | Advantages are obvious when detecting extrapancreatic metastasis and evaluating the tumor load throughout the body | Expensive, less widely available and contrast exposure | Focal hypermetabolism (high SUV) triggers targeted biopsy for suspected aggressive lesions[58] | Moderate | Routine clinical |
| CEUS | The major blood vessels and microvascular system within the pancreas can be displayed | Highly subjective and its accuracy is highly influenced by the operator’s skill level and experience | Elevated perfusion kinetics (high Rs1090) may reduce reliance on biopsy in high-bleeding-risk patients | High | Research-only |
- Citation: Wu YX, Tian R, Li XW, Guo JY, Tang JF, Zhou CF. Emerging non-invasive imaging biomarkers of Ki-67 in pancreatic cancer: Toward predictive precision oncology. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(11): 110468
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v17/i11/110468.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v17.i11.110468
