BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Editorial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Nov 15, 2025; 17(11): 110468
Published online Nov 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i11.110468
Table 1 Advantages and limitations of modalities used in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer
Methods
Advantages
Limitations
Clinical utility for Ki-67 estimation
Utility in Ki-67 prediction
Validation status
USEasy to use, flexible and intuitive, non-invasive and radiation-freeDifficulty visualizing the entire pancreasNo validated biomarkersLowResearch-only
CTExcellent spatial and temporal clarityInability to diagnose pancreatic lesions accuratelyTexture analysis (low entropy excludes high Ki-67 expression)[67]ModerateTransitional
MRIExceptional imaging for depicting local pancreatic diseaseExpensive and less widely availableDiffusion restriction (low ADC) predicts high Ki-67 expression for preoperative risk stratification[48,49]HighLimited clinical use
PETAdvantages are obvious when detecting extrapancreatic metastasis and evaluating the tumor load throughout the bodyExpensive, less widely available and contrast exposureFocal hypermetabolism (high SUV) triggers targeted biopsy for suspected aggressive lesions[58]ModerateRoutine clinical
CEUSThe major blood vessels and microvascular system within the pancreas can be displayedHighly subjective and its accuracy is highly influenced by the operator’s skill level and experienceElevated perfusion kinetics (high Rs1090) may reduce reliance on biopsy in high-bleeding-risk patientsHighResearch-only