Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Oct 15, 2025; 17(10): 111339
Published online Oct 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i10.111339
Published online Oct 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i10.111339
Table 1 Representative applications of artificial intelligence across the clinical research pipeline in gastrointestinal oncology
| Research or products | Application scenarios | Tumor type | Main technologies/algorithms | Findings/strengths | Ref. | |
| AI optimizes clinical trial design | Precise patient stratification | Multimodal integration | GIST | CE-CT WSI | Constructing a multimodal model to predict the RFS of GIST that outperforms unimodal models | Xiao et al[99], 2024 |
| Dynamic endpoint selection | AI predicts alternate endpoints | Pancreatic cancer | Kaplan-Meier, Cox regression and recursive partitioning analysis | By AI analysis, it was found that the combined assessment of CA19-9 response and MPR (TRG0-1) was a better predictor of pre-OS in patients with PDAC | [31] | |
| AI improves patient recruitment & adherence | Intelligent matching system | EHR + NLP parsing | None | NLP | The development of NLP process enables automated extraction of tumor staging and diagnostic information across cancer types with high accuracy | Abedian et al[39], 2021 |
| Patient adherence management | AI remote follow-up personalized intervention | Gastric cancer | CT, DL | DL based on hybrid models may be a potential tool for predicting malnutrition in gastric cancer patients | Huang et al[46], 2024 | |
| Application of AI in efficacy and safety assessment | Automated imaging/pathology evaluation | Image recognition | Colorectal cancer liver metastasis | Fully convolutional networks | The method can effectively improve the work efficiency, but it needs further improvement in segmentation accuracy and consistency | Vorontsov et al[53], 2019 |
| Digital pathology | Colon | WSI | This method can accurately predict molecular features such as gene mutations, copy number changes, MSI, and protein expression in colon cancer patients | Ding et al[60], 2022 | ||
| Adverse event forecasting | AI risk model | None | DySPred | The model demonstrated good stability, was able to predict toxicity trends in different populations and cancer types with small samples, and could be effectively compared with transcriptional changes of small molecule antitumor drugs | Yan et al[62], 2025 | |
| Value and limitations | Colorectal cancer | DL | Models perform well on specific datasets, but they do not generalize well enough to perform consistently well across many different clinical scenarios | Höhn et al[63], 2023 | ||
| RWE and AI | RWD into RWE | Fusion of multiple data sources, AI improves data cleaning efficiency | None | MSK-CHORD | Demonstrates the feasibility of automated annotation from unstructured notes and its utility in predicting patient prognosis | Jee et al[74], 2024 |
| AI bridging clinical trials & practices | Model generalizability validation | None | AI | AI has outstanding advantages in the processing of multiple sets of data and decision making for precise tumors, but still falls short in the areas of limited data on rare cancers, clinical validation needs, and regulatory issues | Vyas et al[78], 2025 | |
- Citation: Wang Z, Zhang RY, Ji C, Zhang JY, Yue BT, Wang F. Revolutionizing gastrointestinal cancer research with artificial intelligence: From precision patient stratification to real-world evidence. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(10): 111339
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v17/i10/111339.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v17.i10.111339
