BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Oct 15, 2025; 17(10): 111339
Published online Oct 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i10.111339
Table 1 Representative applications of artificial intelligence across the clinical research pipeline in gastrointestinal oncology
Research or products
Application scenarios
Tumor type
Main technologies/algorithms
Findings/strengths
Ref.
AI optimizes clinical trial designPrecise patient stratificationMultimodal integrationGISTCE-CT WSIConstructing a multimodal model to predict the RFS of GIST that outperforms unimodal modelsXiao et al[99], 2024
Dynamic endpoint selectionAI predicts alternate endpointsPancreatic cancerKaplan-Meier, Cox regression and recursive partitioning analysisBy AI analysis, it was found that the combined assessment of CA19-9 response and MPR (TRG0-1) was a better predictor of pre-OS in patients with PDAC[31]
AI improves patient recruitment & adherenceIntelligent matching systemEHR + NLP parsingNoneNLPThe development of NLP process enables automated extraction of tumor staging and diagnostic information across cancer types with high accuracyAbedian et al[39], 2021
Patient adherence managementAI remote follow-up personalized interventionGastric cancerCT, DLDL based on hybrid models may be a potential tool for predicting malnutrition in gastric cancer patientsHuang et al[46], 2024
Application of AI in efficacy and safety assessmentAutomated imaging/pathology evaluationImage recognitionColorectal cancer liver metastasisFully convolutional networksThe method can effectively improve the work efficiency, but it needs further improvement in segmentation accuracy and consistencyVorontsov et al[53], 2019
Digital pathologyColonWSIThis method can accurately predict molecular features such as gene mutations, copy number changes, MSI, and protein expression in colon cancer patientsDing et al[60], 2022
Adverse event forecastingAI risk modelNoneDySPredThe model demonstrated good stability, was able to predict toxicity trends in different populations and cancer types with small samples, and could be effectively compared with transcriptional changes of small molecule antitumor drugsYan et al[62], 2025
Value and limitationsColorectal cancerDLModels perform well on specific datasets, but they do not generalize well enough to perform consistently well across many different clinical scenariosHöhn et al[63], 2023
RWE and AIRWD into RWEFusion of multiple data sources, AI improves data cleaning efficiencyNoneMSK-CHORDDemonstrates the feasibility of automated annotation from unstructured notes and its utility in predicting patient prognosisJee et al[74], 2024
AI bridging clinical trials & practicesModel generalizability validationNoneAIAI has outstanding advantages in the processing of multiple sets of data and decision making for precise tumors, but still falls short in the areas of limited data on rare cancers, clinical validation needs, and regulatory issuesVyas et al[78], 2025