Correlation analysis of interstitial maturity and prognosis of colorectal cancer: Meta-analysis

doi:10.4251/wjgo.v16.i6.2816

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 16, Issue 6

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (2900)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-4) series, Tables (1-2) series.

Item

Count

PDF

180

HTML

1202

Figures (1-4)

392

Tables (1-2)

444

Sum=2218

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

Download

488

Sum=566

Jun 15, 2024 (publication date) through Oct 30, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (0)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology

ISSN

1948-5204

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta-Analysis

World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jun 15, 2024; 16(6): 2816-2825
Published online Jun 15, 2024. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i6.2816

Table 1 Basic characteristics of included studies and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale scores (mean ± SD)

Ref.	Time	Research type	Cases	Gender (male/female)	Age (yr)	Stage	Follow-up time (months)	NOS score
Ueno et al[5]	2002	Cohort study	627	393/234	60.3 ± 12	Ⅰ-Ⅲ	153 (80-267)	6
Ueno et al[6]	2004	Cohort study	862	NA	NA	Ⅰ-Ⅲ	140	6
Wu et al[7]	2014	Cohort study	412	NA	61.4 ± 12	Ⅳ	61 (11-188)	7
Ueno et al[8]	2015	Cohort study	880	512/368	62.9 ± 13	Ⅱ-Ⅲ	68	8
Ueno et al[8]	2015	Cohort study	474	268/206	66.3 ± 13	Ⅱ-Ⅲ	68	6
Ueno et al[9]	2017	Cohort study	821	484/337	66.2 ± 12	Ⅱ-Ⅲ	59 (1-86)	7
Wu et al[10]	2018	Cohort study	466	264/202	59.9 ± 13	Ⅲ	59 (45-144)	7
Wu et al[10]	2018	Cohort study	432	247/185	65.1 ± 12	Ⅲ	58 (1-87)	8
Shin et al[11]	2019	Cohort study	151	88/63	63.2 ± 11	Ⅰ-Ⅳ	56	6
Konishi et al[12]	2018	Cohort study	851	407/444	66 ± 14	Ⅰ-Ⅲ	58	6
Nearchou et al[13]	2019	Cohort study	283	184/99	62.3 ± 11	Ⅱ	NA	6
Nearchou et al[13]	2019	Cohort study	163	87/76	63 ± 12	Ⅱ	NA	7
Ueno et al[14]	2019	Cohort study	679	400/279	64.0 ± 12	Ⅱ	91	8
Ueno et al[14]	2019	Cohort study	446	267/179	67.0 ± 12	Ⅱ	58	8
González et al[15]	2020	Cohort study	342	179/163	65.2 ± 12.6	Ⅰ-Ⅲ	NA	8
Hacking et al[16]	2020	Cohort study	234	111/118	64 ± 13	I-Ⅲ	NA	6
Ao et al[17]	2020	Cohort study	363	209/154	66.6 ± 12	Ⅲ	61 (1-136)	8
Gonzalez et al[18]	2021	Cohort study	372	189/183	65.7 ± 12.9	Ⅰ-Ⅲ	62 (1-170)	6
Ueno et al[19]	2021	Cohort study	991	601/390	65.5 ± 12.2	Ⅱ	69.7 (2.1-105.6)	7

NOS: Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

Full Size Table

Table 2 Meta-regression analysis of recurrence survival and overall survival

Interstitial maturity	Heterogeneous factor	Relapse free survival		Overall survival rate
Interstitial maturity	Heterogeneous factor	Coefficient	P value	Coefficient	P value
Immaturity	Age	0.098	0.8	0.06	0.93
	Region (Europe and America/Asia)	0.084	0.81	0.63	0.18
	Gender (male/female)	0.05	0.93	0.46	0.21
	Stage (Ⅰ-Ⅱ/Ⅲ-Ⅳ)	-0.73	0.16	-0.5	0.39
	Tumor site (node/rectum)	0.68	0.14	0.46	0.54
	Degree of differentiation (high/medium/low)	-0.02	0.95	-0.74	0.49

Full Size Table

Citation: Liu ZJ, Zhang XW, Liu QQ, Wang SZ. Correlation analysis of interstitial maturity and prognosis of colorectal cancer: Meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16(6): 2816-2825
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v16/i6/2816.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v16.i6.2816