Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Mar 15, 2024; 16(3): 773-786
Published online Mar 15, 2024. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i3.773
Published online Mar 15, 2024. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i3.773
Table 1 Pelvic measurement parameters and definitions
Parameter name | Definition |
Anterior-posterior diameter of pelvic inlet (AB) | Distance between the midpoint of the superior pubic symphysis and the midpoint of the anterior margin of the sacral promontory |
Transverse diameter of pelvic inlet (PQ) | Maximum distance between the left and right iliopectineal line |
Anterior-posterior diameter of mid-pelvis (CD) | Distance between the midpoint of the inferior pubic symphysis and the midpoint of the sacrococcygeal junction |
Anterior-posterior diameter of pelvic outlet (CE) | Distance between the midpoint of the inferior pubic symphysis and the tip of the coccyx |
Interischial spine diameter (LM) | Shortest distance between the ischial spines |
Interischial tuberosity diameter (NO) | Shortest distance between the ischial tuberosities |
Superior-inferior diameter of the pubic symphysis (AC) | Distance between the superior and inferior borders of the pubic symphysis |
Sacrococcygeal distance (BE) | Distance between the midpoint of the anterior margin of the sacral promontory and the tip of the coccyx |
Superior-inferior diameter of sacrum (BD) | Distance between the midpoint of the anterior margin of the sacral promontory and the midpoint of the sacrococcygeal junction |
Sacrococcygeal angle (α) | The angle between the extended lines of the anterior-posterior diameter of pelvic inlet and the anterior-posterior diameter of pelvic outlet |
Sacropubic angle (β) | Angle between the extended lines of the anteroposterior diameter of pelvic inlet and the anterior-posterior diameter of mid-pelvis |
Sacrococcygeal curvature height (FI) | Vertical distance from the most convex point of the sacrococcygeal curve to the sacrococcygeal distance |
Sacral curvature height (FH) | Vertical distance from the most convex point of the sacral curve to the superior-inferior diameter of sacrum |
Superior pubococcygeal diameter (AE) | Distance between the midpoint of the superior pubic symphysis and the tip of the coccyx |
Anterior-posterior sacropubic distance (FG) | Vertical distance from the most convex point of the sacrococcygeal curve to the superior-inferior diameter of pubic symphysis or its extended line |
Table 2 Soft tissue measurement parameters and definitions
Parameter name | Definition |
Rectal area (a) | Area of the rectum at the level of the ischial spine |
Mesorectal fat area (b) | Area of the mesorectal fat at the level of the ischial spine |
Visceral fat area (c) | Area of visceral fat at the level of the umbilicus |
Subcutaneous fat area (d) | Area of subcutaneous fat at the level of the umbilicus |
Waist circumference (e) | Circumference of the waist at the level of the umbilicus |
Anterior-posterior abdominal diameter (RS) | It refers to the distance measured from the line connecting the umbilicus to the spinous process at the level of the umbilicus, between the abdominal wall section and the lumbar section |
Transverse abdominal diameter (TU) | It refers to the distance measured from the level of the umbilicus to the horizontal line at the anterior edge of the lumbar vertebrae |
Table 3 Normality test analysis of each variable
Variable name | W value | P value |
Anterior-posterior diameter of pelvic inlet | 0.9905098 | 0.1642 |
Transverse diameter of pelvic inlet | 0.9914321 | 0.2294 |
Anterior-posterior diameter of mid-pelvis | 0.9758847 | 0.0009 |
Anterior-posterior diameter of pelvic outlet | 0.9716010 | 0.0002 |
Interischial spine diameter | 0.9840155 | 0.0146 |
Interischial tuberosity diameter | 0.9848102 | 0.0195 |
Superior-inferior diameter of the pubic symphysis | 0.9878909 | 0.0617 |
Sacrococcygeal distance | 0.9947691 | 0.6552 |
Superior-inferior diameter of sacrum | 0.9883327 | 0.0729 |
Sacrococcygeal angle | 0.9931951 | 0.4174 |
Sacropubic angle | 0.9720830 | 0.0003 |
Sacrococcygeal curvature height | 0.8480501 | 0.0000 |
Sacral curvature height | 0.9947091 | 0.6454 |
Superior pubococcygeal diameter | 0.9918030 | 0.2615 |
Anterior-posterior sacropubic distance | 0.9114720 | 0.0000 |
Anterior-posterior diameter of pelvic inlet/sacrococcygeal distance | 0.9723249 | 0.0003 |
Visceral fat area | 0.9564061 | 0.0000 |
Subcutaneous fat area | 0.9635344 | 0.0000 |
Waist circumference | 0.9939451 | 0.5244 |
Anterior-posterior abdominal diameter | 0.9863249 | 0.0343 |
Transverse abdominal diameter | 0.9939991 | 0.5327 |
Rectal area | 0.9221744 | 0.0000 |
Mesorectal fat area | 0.9777443 | 0.0016 |
Table 4 Clinical and pathological characteristics data of 218 patients in the laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer
Range | mean ± SD or median (Q1, Q3) | No. of cases (percentage), n (%) | |
Age (yr) | 32-89 | 66 (59, 74) | |
Sex | |||
Male | 139 (63.76) | ||
Female | 79 (36.24) | ||
BMI (kg/m2) | 14.42-31.25 | 22.57 ± 3.17 | |
ASA grading | |||
I | 22 (10.09) | ||
II | 185 (84.86) | ||
III | 11 (5.05) | ||
History of previous abdominal surgery | 19 (8.72) | ||
Neoadjuvant therapy | 8 (3.67) | ||
pTNM/ypTNM staging | |||
0 | 9 (4.13) | ||
I | 53 (24.31) | ||
II | 63 (28.9) | ||
III | 93 (42.66) |
Table 5 mean ± standard deviation or median (Q1, Q3) of 16 pelvic parameters and 7 soft tissue parameters measured by 218 computerized tomography scans and comparison between sexes
Variable name | Total cases (n = 218), mean ± SD or median (Q1, Q3) | Male (n = 139), mean ± SD or median (Q1, Q3) | Female (n = 79), mean ± SD or median (Q1, Q3) | Mean comparison between sexes, P value |
Anterior-posterior diameter of pelvic inlet in mm | 114.36 ± 11.99 | 110.57 ± 10.84 | 121.03 ± 11.01 | 0.0000a |
Transverse diameter of pelvic inlet in mm | 123.3 ± 8.14 | 119.81 ± 6.57 | 129.44 ± 6.93 | 0.0000a |
Anterior-posterior diameter of mid pelvis in mm | 111.59 (105.76, 117.26) | 109.06 (103.5, 114.76) | 113.94 (109.81, 121.44) | 0.0000a |
Anterior-posterior diameter of pelvic outlet in mm | 88.34 (82.35, 95.73) | 86.45 (80.03, 91.33) | 93.12 (85.32, 99.8) | 0.0000a |
Interischial spine diameter in mm | 95.92 (88.9, 104.09) | 90.77 (84.88, 96.05) | 106.73 (102.53, 112.28) | 0.0000a |
Interischial tuberosity diameter | 104.88 (96.78, 116.95) | 99.58 (93.26, 108.12) | 117.37 (109.52, 126.2) | 0.0000a |
Superior-inferior diameter of pubic symphysis in mm | 41.8 ± 4.92 | 43.11 ± 4.99 | 39.49 ± 3.82 | 0.0000a |
Sacrococcygeal distance in mm | 122.92 ± 12.02 | 125.23 ± 11.53 | 118.84 ± 11.83 | 0.0002a |
Superior-inferior diameter of sacrum in mm | 105.36 ± 10.35 | 106.76 ± 9.79 | 102.9 ± 10.89 | 0.0101a |
Sacrococcygeal curvature height in mm | 39.15 (35.81, 42.96) | 39.7 (36.42, 44.05) | 38.3 (34.67, 41.45) | 0.0204a |
Sacral curvature height in mm | 20.87 ± 5.66 | 21.14 ± 5.74 | 20.38 ± 5.53 | 0.3385 |
Superior pubococcygeal diameter in mm | 119.39 ± 9.27 | 119.41 ± 8.68 | 119.34 ± 10.29 | 0.9596 |
Anterior-posterior sacropubic distance in mm | 119.6 (113.39, 126.28) | 117.03 (112.54, 123.58) | 123.86 (116.48, 130.88) | 0.0000a |
Sacrococcygeal angle (°) | 48.37 ± 7.28 | 50.7 ± 6.67 | 44.26 ± 6.47 | 0.0000a |
Sacropubic angle (°) | 33.01 (29.28, 36.75) | 34.24 (30.42, 37.42) | 31.48 (28.09, 35.24) | 0.0028a |
Anterior-posterior diameter of pelvic inlet/sacrococcygeal distance | 0.93 (0.85, 0.99) | 0.88 (0.83, 0.94) | 0.99 (0.96, 1.08) | 0.0000a |
Rectal area in cm2 | 16.67 (12.12, 21.69) | 16.69 (11.48, 21.99) | 16.57 (12.44, 21.39) | 0.8389 |
Mesorectal fat area in cm2 | 38.57 (26.71, 51.24) | 44.17 (32.87, 53.19) | 30.95 (21.2, 43.35) | 0.0000a |
Visceral fat area in cm2 | 202.65 (122.4, 259.89) | 219.86 (125.28, 277.74) | 174.12 (120.58, 242) | 0.1184 |
Subcutaneous fat area in cm2 | 255.35 (184.82, 338.59) | 235.63 (138.73, 294.54) | 319.87 (226.14, 403.15) | 0.0000a |
Waist circumference in cm | 81.69 ± 9.26 | 82.02 ± 9.45 | 81.1 ± 8.95 | 0.4744 |
Anterior-posterior abdominal diameter in cm | 18.22 (16.14, 19.93) | 18.26 (16.52, 20.35) | 17.72 (15.29, 19.33) | 0.0447a |
Transverse abdominal diameter in cm | 28.69 ± 2.78 | 28.72 ± 2.67 | 28.65 ± 2.99 | 0.8653 |
- Citation: Zhou XC, Ke FY, Dhamija G, Chen H, Wang Q. Study on sex differences and potential clinical value of three-dimensional computerized tomography pelvimetry in rectal cancer patients. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16(3): 773-786
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v16/i3/773.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v16.i3.773