Copyright
        ©The Author(s) 2024.
    
    
        World J Gastrointest Oncol. Nov 15, 2024; 16(11): 4402-4408
Published online Nov 15, 2024. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i11.4402
Published online Nov 15, 2024. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i11.4402
            Table 1 Surgical effect, n (%)
        
    | Group | Lump resection | Curative resection | Basal lesion residual | 
| ESD group (n = 42) | 40 (95.24) | 2 (4.76) | 0 | 
| EMR group (n = 38) | 28 (73.68) | 8 (21.05) | 2 (5.26) | 
| χ2 | 7.269 | 3.466 | 0.622 | 
| P value | 0.007 | 0.063 | 0.430 | 
            Table 2 Surgical conditions, mean ± SD
        
    | Group | Operation time (minute) | Intraoperative bleeding volume (mL) | Gastrointestinal ventilation time (hour) | Length of stay (day) | 
| ESD group (n = 42) | 62.83 ± 8.48 | 28.48 ± 5.28 | 25.85 ± 5.48 | 12.83 ± 4.28 | 
| EMR group (n = 38) | 51.36 ± 7.15 | 22.52 ± 4.19 | 36.76 ± 7.15 | 13.28 ± 4.51 | 
| t value | 6.504 | 5.553 | 7.701 | 0.458 | 
| P value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.648 | 
            Table 3 Nutrition status, mean ± SD
        
    | Group | ALB (g/L) | PA (mg/L) | Hb (g/L) | TRF (g/L) | ||||
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | |
| ESD group (n = 42) | 47.86 ± 4.28 | 42.28 ± 3.67a | 328.84 ± 35.26 | 302.15 ± 24.78a | 118.20 ± 8.87 | 108.24 ± 7.48a | 2.38 ± 0.82 | 1.90 ± 0.47a | 
| EMR group (n = 38) | 48.04 ± 4.36 | 35.86 ± 4.15a | 331.05 ± 37.82 | 278.53 ± 25.69a | 120.49 ± 9.36 | 98.89 ± 7.27a | 2.40 ± 0.85 | 1.67 ± 0.41a | 
| t value | 0.186 | 7.343 | 0.270 | 4.184 | 1.123 | 5.658 | 0.107 | 2.321 | 
| P value | 0.853 | < 0.001 | 0.788 | < 0.001 | 0.265 | < 0.001 | 0.915 | 0.023 | 
            Table 4 Gastrointestinal hormones, mean ± SD (µg/L)
        
    - Citation: Xu QD, Liu H, Zhang HW, Gao XM, Li YG, Wu ZY. Effect of endoscopic submucosal dissection on gastrointestinal function and nutritional status in patients with early gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16(11): 4402-4408
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v16/i11/4402.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v16.i11.4402

 
         
                         
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                         
                         
                        