Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Apr 15, 2022; 14(4): 887-896
Published online Apr 15, 2022. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i4.887
Published online Apr 15, 2022. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i4.887
Table 1 Comparison of baseline data between the two groups, n (%)
Normal information | Reconstruction group (n = 40) | Regular group (n = 58) | t/χ2 value | P value |
Age (yr) | 58.6 ± 7.0 | 59.0 ± 6.6 | -0.2877 | 0.77422 |
Body mass index (kg/m2) | 22.6 ± 1.9 | 22.8 ± 2.3 | -0.4533 | 0.65132 |
Sex | 1.319 | 0.251 | ||
Male | 28 (70) | 34 (58.62) | ||
Female | 12 (30) | 24 (41.38) | ||
Surgical approach | 1.227 | 0.746 | ||
Cholangiocarcinoma resection | 11 (27.5) | 22 (37.93) | ||
Left liver + Caudate lobe | 13 (32.5) | 15 (25.86) | ||
Right liver + Caudate lobe | 12 (30) | 16 (27.59) | ||
Other types | 4 (10) | 5 (8.62) | ||
Bismuth-Corlette type | 1.179 | 0.758 | ||
I type | 14 (35) | 25 (43.1) | ||
II type | 16 (40) | 21 (36.21) | ||
III type | 8 (20) | 8 (13.79) | ||
IV type | 2 (5) | 4 (6.9) | ||
Regional lymph node metastasis | 0.764 | 0.382 | ||
Yes | 18 (45) | 21 (36.21) | ||
No | 22 (55) | 37 (63.79) | ||
Adjuvant chemotherapy | 1.696 | 0.193 | ||
Yes | 35 (87.5) | 55 (94.83) | ||
No | 5 (12.5) | 3 (5.17) |
Table 2 Comparison of surgical trauma indexes between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Group | n | Operation time (min) | Surgical bleeding (mL) | Gastrointestinal function recovery time (h) | Hospital stay (d) |
Reconstruction group | 40 | 11.36 ± 1.03 | 906.8 ± 155.3 | 73.6 ± 13.0 | 21.61 ± 3.9 |
Regular group | 58 | 9.71 ± 0.81 | 720.3 ± 160.1 | 64.8 ± 11.0 | 19.3 ± 3.2 |
t value | 8.863 | 5.737 | 3.612 | 3.210 | |
P value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Table 3 Comparison of the effect of operational resection between the two groups, n (%)
Group | n | R0 excision | Non-R0 resection |
Reconstruction group | 40 | 36 (90.00) | 4 (10.00) |
Regular group | 58 | 42 (72.41) | 16 (27.59) |
χ2 | 4.507 | ||
P value | 0.034 |
Table 4 Comparison of Karnofsky performance status scores between the two groups of patients before and after operation (mean ± SD, scores)
Group | n | Preoperative | 2 wk after surgery | 8 wk after surgery |
Reconstruction group | 40 | 75.1 ± 4.2 | 66.9 ± 5.0 | 76.7 ± 4.8 |
Regular group | 58 | 73.7 ± 3.5 | 64.0 ± 5.7 | 75.4 ± 5.0 |
χ2 | 1.793 | 2.600 | 1.286 | |
P value | 0.076 | 0.011 | 0.202 |
Table 5 Comparison of liver function indexes between two groups of patients (mean ± SD)
Index | Preoperative | 1 d after operation | 3 d after operation |
ALT (U/L) | |||
Reconstruction group | 78.9 ± 19.6 | 451.2 ± 88.1 | 357.1 ± 93.0 |
Regular group | 83.0 ± 20.1 | 489.8 ± 94.7 | 401.2 ± 85.0 |
t value | -1.003 | -2.040 | -2.429 |
P value | 0.319 | 0.044 | 0.017 |
AST (U/L) | |||
Reconstruction group | 83.5 ± 28.0 | 438.1 ± 93.0 | 395.8 ± 81.7 |
Regular group | 80.0 ± 24.6 | 470.7 ± 87.2 | 441.5 ± 96.1 |
t value | 0.654 | -1.770 | -2.456 |
P value | 0.515 | 0.080 | 0.016 |
TBIL (μmol/L) | |||
Reconstruction group | 144.3 ± 35.1 | 122.2 ± 28.0 | 44.1 ± 13.0 |
Regular group | 138.5 ± 37.3 | 118.0 ± 26.9 | 40.0 ± 12.5 |
t value | 0.775 | 0.747 | 1.570 |
P value | 0.440 | 0.457 | 0.120 |
Table 6 Observation of complication rate
Group | n | Biliary fistula | Liver failure | Incision infection | Urinary tract infection | Lung infection | Complication rate, n (%) |
Reconstruction group | 40 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 11 (27.50) |
Regular group | 58 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 19 (32.76) |
χ2 | 0.308 | ||||||
P value | 0.579 |
Table 7 Two-year survival rate observation, n (%)
Group | n | Survive | Death |
Reconstruction group | 40 | 17 (42.50) | 23 (57.50) |
Regular group | 58 | 23 (39.66) | 35 (60.34) |
χ2 | 0.079 | ||
P value | 0.778 |
- Citation: Li YM, Bie ZX, Guo RQ, Li B, Wang CE, Yan F. Effect of hepatic artery resection and reconstruction on the prognosis of patients with advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2022; 14(4): 887-896
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v14/i4/887.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v14.i4.887