Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Nov 15, 2020; 12(11): 1272-1287
Published online Nov 15, 2020. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i11.1272
Table 1 Relationship between long non-coding RNA C9orf139 and pathological data of patients
Variable
LncRNA C9orf139
χ2
P value
High expression (n = 27)
Low expression (n = 27)
Age0.2601.271
≥ 60 yr (n = 20)12 (44.44)8 (29.63)
< 60 yr (n = 34)15 (55.56)19 (70.37)
Sex0.3070.580
Male (n = 32)15 (55.56)17 (62.96)
Female (n = 22)12 (44.44)10 (37.04)
Tumor size0.3330.564
≥ 3 cm (n = 18)10 (37.04)8 (29.63)
< 3 cm (n = 36)17 (62.96)19 (70.37)
TNM stage9.8260.002
I-II (n = 35)12 (44.44)23 (85.19)
III-IV (n = 19)15 (55.56)4 (14.81)
Degree of differentiation4.2070.040
Poor (n = 17)12 (44.44)5 (18.52)
Moderate and high (n = 37)15 (55.56)22 (81.48)
Lymph node metastasis5.2060.004
Yes (n = 13)11 (40.74)2 (7.41)
No (n = 41)16 (59.26)25 (92.59)
Table 2 Prognostic analysis of long non-coding RNA C9orf139 in patients
VariableUnivariate Cox regression analysis
Multivariate Cox regression analysis
P value
HR
95CI%
P value
HR
95CI%
Age (≥ 60 yr vs < 60 yr)0.6371.1580.631-2.125
Sex (male vs female)0.8850.9570.528-1.734
Tumor size (≥ 3 cm vs < 3 cm)0.1600.6480.354-1.187
TNM stage (I + II vs III + IV)0.0351.9321.047-3.5640.1091.7240.886-3.353
Degree of differentiation (poor vs moderate and high)0.0190.4770.257-0.8860.0450.5260.281-0.987
Lymph node metastasis (yes vs no)0.0190.4560.237-0.8770.1670.6220.317-1.219
C9orf139 (low expression vs high expression)0.0100.4550.251-0.8250.0200.4880.267-0.893