Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Nov 15, 2019; 11(11): 1021-1030
Published online Nov 15, 2019. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i11.1021
Published online Nov 15, 2019. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i11.1021
Table 1 Patients baseline characteristics and 5-fluorouracil exposure
| Total (n = 81) | Capecitabine | S-1 | P value |
| (n = 41) | (n = 40) | ||
| Age | |||
| Median (Range) | 61 (39-77) | 63 (41-78) | 0.175 |
| Gender, n (%) | |||
| Male | 24 (59) | 27 (67) | 0.404 |
| Female | 17 (41) | 13 (33) | |
| ECOG performance status, n (%) | |||
| 0-1 | 30 (73) | 29 (72) | 0.946 |
| 2 | 11 (27) | 11 (28) | |
| Disease status at diagnosis, n (%) | |||
| Resectable | 15 (36) | 26 (65) | |
| Locally advanced | 4 (10) | 2 (5) | |
| Metastatic | 19 (46) | 12 (30) | |
| Missing data | 3 (7) | 0 | |
| Overall disease classification, n (%) | |||
| Initially unresectable | 23 (56) | 14 (35) | 0.057 |
| Locally advanced | 4 (9) | 2 (5) | |
| Distant metastasi | 19 (46) | 12 (30) | |
| Recurrent | 18 (44) | 26 (65) | |
| Prior treatment, n (%) | |||
| Surgery | 18 (44) | 26 (65) | 0.057 |
| Radiotherapy | 17 (41) | 11 (28) | 0.186 |
| Adjuvant chemotherapy | 14 (34) | 19 (48) | 0.221 |
| Number of previous regimens received, n (%) | |||
| 1 | 40 (98) | 36 (90) | 0.201 |
| > 2 | 1 (2) | 4 (10) | |
| Subsequent chemotherapy after oral chemotherapy, n (%) | 12 (29) | 17 (43) | 0.214 |
| Prior gemcitabine-based regimen, n (%) | |||
| Gemcitabine | 8 (20) | 9 (22) | |
| Gemcitabine/erlotinib | 31 (76) | 7 (18) | |
| Gemcitabine/cisplatin | 2 (5) | 0 | |
| Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel | 0 | 24 (60) | |
| 5-Fluorouracil exposure, n (%) | 13 (31) | 19 (50) | 0.146 |
Table 2 Relative dose intensity of the capecitabine or S-1 for advanced gemcitabine refractory pancreatic cancer
| Capecitabine (n = 41) | S-1 (n = 40) | P value | |
| Duration of treatment, months | |||
| Median | 1.7 | 2.0 | 0.120 |
| Range | 0.7-6.9 | 0.8-6.2 | |
| Dose intensity | |||
| Median | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.986 |
| Range | 0.70-1.00 | 0.50-1.00 | |
Table 3 Response rate in each treatment regimen
| Capecitabine (n = 41) | S-1 (n = 40) | P value | |
| Complete response | 0 | 0 | |
| Partial response | 4 (9.8) | 1 (2.5) | |
| Stable disease | 5 (12.2) | 10 (25.0) | |
| Progressive disease | 32 (78.0) | 27 (67.5) | |
| Not available | 0 | 2 (5.0) | |
| Objective response rate, n (%) | 4 (9.8) | 1 (2.5) | 0.359 |
| Disease control rate, n (%) | 8 (19.5) | 11 (21.5) | 0.396 |
Table 4 Toxicity profile during treatment
| Adverse event n, (%) | Capecitabine (n = 41) | S-1 (n = 40) | |||
| Any grade | Grade ≥ 3 | Any grade | Grade ≥ 3 | P value1 | |
| Nausea | 11 (26.8) | 1 (2.4) | 13 (32.5) | 1 (2.5) | 1.000 |
| Vomiting | 4 (9.8) | 1 (2.4) | 5 (12.5) | 0 | 1.000 |
| Diarrhea | 4 (9.8) | 0 | 3 (7.5) | 0 | |
| Stomatitis | 7 (17.1) | 0 | 6 (15.0) | 1 (2.5) | 0.494 |
| Hand-foot syndrome | 13 (31.7) | 6 (14.6) | 2 (5.0) | 0 | 0.026 |
| Anemia | 12 (29.3) | 0 | 9 (22.5) | 0 | |
| Neutropenia | 7 (17.1) | 0 | 3 (7.5) | 0 | |
- Citation: Park SJ, Kim H, Shin K, Lee MA, Hong TH. Oral chemotherapy for second-line treatment in patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2019; 11(11): 1021-1030
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v11/i11/1021.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v11.i11.1021
