Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Nov 15, 2019; 11(11): 1021-1030
Published online Nov 15, 2019. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i11.1021
Published online Nov 15, 2019. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i11.1021
Table 1 Patients baseline characteristics and 5-fluorouracil exposure
Total (n = 81) | Capecitabine | S-1 | P value |
(n = 41) | (n = 40) | ||
Age | |||
Median (Range) | 61 (39-77) | 63 (41-78) | 0.175 |
Gender, n (%) | |||
Male | 24 (59) | 27 (67) | 0.404 |
Female | 17 (41) | 13 (33) | |
ECOG performance status, n (%) | |||
0-1 | 30 (73) | 29 (72) | 0.946 |
2 | 11 (27) | 11 (28) | |
Disease status at diagnosis, n (%) | |||
Resectable | 15 (36) | 26 (65) | |
Locally advanced | 4 (10) | 2 (5) | |
Metastatic | 19 (46) | 12 (30) | |
Missing data | 3 (7) | 0 | |
Overall disease classification, n (%) | |||
Initially unresectable | 23 (56) | 14 (35) | 0.057 |
Locally advanced | 4 (9) | 2 (5) | |
Distant metastasi | 19 (46) | 12 (30) | |
Recurrent | 18 (44) | 26 (65) | |
Prior treatment, n (%) | |||
Surgery | 18 (44) | 26 (65) | 0.057 |
Radiotherapy | 17 (41) | 11 (28) | 0.186 |
Adjuvant chemotherapy | 14 (34) | 19 (48) | 0.221 |
Number of previous regimens received, n (%) | |||
1 | 40 (98) | 36 (90) | 0.201 |
> 2 | 1 (2) | 4 (10) | |
Subsequent chemotherapy after oral chemotherapy, n (%) | 12 (29) | 17 (43) | 0.214 |
Prior gemcitabine-based regimen, n (%) | |||
Gemcitabine | 8 (20) | 9 (22) | |
Gemcitabine/erlotinib | 31 (76) | 7 (18) | |
Gemcitabine/cisplatin | 2 (5) | 0 | |
Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel | 0 | 24 (60) | |
5-Fluorouracil exposure, n (%) | 13 (31) | 19 (50) | 0.146 |
Table 2 Relative dose intensity of the capecitabine or S-1 for advanced gemcitabine refractory pancreatic cancer
Capecitabine (n = 41) | S-1 (n = 40) | P value | |
Duration of treatment, months | |||
Median | 1.7 | 2.0 | 0.120 |
Range | 0.7-6.9 | 0.8-6.2 | |
Dose intensity | |||
Median | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.986 |
Range | 0.70-1.00 | 0.50-1.00 |
Table 3 Response rate in each treatment regimen
Capecitabine (n = 41) | S-1 (n = 40) | P value | |
Complete response | 0 | 0 | |
Partial response | 4 (9.8) | 1 (2.5) | |
Stable disease | 5 (12.2) | 10 (25.0) | |
Progressive disease | 32 (78.0) | 27 (67.5) | |
Not available | 0 | 2 (5.0) | |
Objective response rate, n (%) | 4 (9.8) | 1 (2.5) | 0.359 |
Disease control rate, n (%) | 8 (19.5) | 11 (21.5) | 0.396 |
Table 4 Toxicity profile during treatment
Adverse event n, (%) | Capecitabine (n = 41) | S-1 (n = 40) | |||
Any grade | Grade ≥ 3 | Any grade | Grade ≥ 3 | P value1 | |
Nausea | 11 (26.8) | 1 (2.4) | 13 (32.5) | 1 (2.5) | 1.000 |
Vomiting | 4 (9.8) | 1 (2.4) | 5 (12.5) | 0 | 1.000 |
Diarrhea | 4 (9.8) | 0 | 3 (7.5) | 0 | |
Stomatitis | 7 (17.1) | 0 | 6 (15.0) | 1 (2.5) | 0.494 |
Hand-foot syndrome | 13 (31.7) | 6 (14.6) | 2 (5.0) | 0 | 0.026 |
Anemia | 12 (29.3) | 0 | 9 (22.5) | 0 | |
Neutropenia | 7 (17.1) | 0 | 3 (7.5) | 0 |
- Citation: Park SJ, Kim H, Shin K, Lee MA, Hong TH. Oral chemotherapy for second-line treatment in patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2019; 11(11): 1021-1030
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v11/i11/1021.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v11.i11.1021