BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Editorial Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Oct 15, 2025; 17(10): 110464
Published online Oct 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i10.110464
Uridine diphosphate-glucose 6-dehydrogenase-mediated glucuronidation and its emerging role in gut-liver immune regulation
Ye-Qiu Yang, Shuai Liu, Department of Cardiology, The First People’s Hospital of Jiashan, Jiaxing 314100, Zhejiang Province, China
Ning Li, Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang Province, China
Yong-Wei Yu, Department of Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang Province, China
ORCID number: Shuai Liu (0009-0009-6551-0224); Yong-Wei Yu (0000-0001-8319-7707).
Co-corresponding authors: Shuai Liu and Yong-Wei Yu.
Author contributions: Yang YQ and Li N wrote the manuscript; Yu YW and Liu S designed the study and revised the manuscript; All listed authors consent to the submission.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Yong-Wei Yu, PhD, Department of Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang Province, China. yuyongwei@zju.edu.cn
Received: June 10, 2025
Revised: July 13, 2025
Accepted: August 14, 2025
Published online: October 15, 2025
Processing time: 129 Days and 22.5 Hours

Abstract

This editorial builds on a recent study by Cao et al, which identified uridine diphosphate-glucose 6-dehydrogenase (UGDH) as a pro-tumorigenic enzyme in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). UGDH, a key catalyst in glucuronidation, promotes tumor growth and correlates with immunosuppressive features in the HCC microenvironment. Expanding on these findings, we explore broader implications of UGDH within the gut-liver axis. We propose that UGDH regulates immune tone not only through detoxification of bile acids and microbial products, but also by maintaining intestinal barrier integrity. Its dysregulation may impair glucuronidation, leading to bile acid accumulation, increased gut permeability, and microbial translocation, collectively promoting hepatic immune tolerance. Additionally, emerging evidence suggests that gut microbiota-derived metabolites can modulate hepatic UGDH expression, forming a bidirectional feedback loop between microbial ecology and liver metabolism. In this context, UGDH may act as a metabolic immune checkpoint, linking metabolic dysfunction with immune escape mechanisms such as programmed cell death ligand 1 upregulation and cyclic guanosine monophosphate-adenosine monophosphate synthase-stimulator of interferon genes pathway activation. Targeting UGDH could therefore help restore gut-liver immune balance and delay gastrointestinal cancer progression, especially in metabolic HCC. This editorial integrates metabolic, microbial, and immunological perspectives to support a novel translational framework.

Key Words: Uridine diphosphate-glucose 6-dehydrogenase; Glucuronidation; Gut-liver axis; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Immune microenvironment

Core Tip: Uridine diphosphate-glucose 6-dehydrogenase (UGDH), a key metabolic enzyme involved in glucuronidation, is increasingly recognized for its role in hepatocellular carcinoma progression. Recent studies have revealed that dysregulated UGDH contributes not only to metabolic reprogramming but also to immune suppression by disrupting bile acid detoxification and facilitating microbial translocation from the gut. This editorial highlights the dual function of UGDH as both a metabolic and immune modulator, and introduces a novel hypothesis that positions UGDH as a potential checkpoint within the gut-liver immune axis. Understanding this interplay could lead to new therapeutic strategies targeting metabolic-immune cross-talk in gastrointestinal oncology.



INTRODUCTION

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a major global health concern, particularly in the context of the increasing incidence of metabolic liver diseases and shifting immune landscapes[1-3]. Although traditional research has focused on viral etiologies and oncogenic mutations, recent insights have emphasized the pivotal role of metabolic enzymes in orchestrating tumor development and immune responses[1,4]. One such enzyme, uridine diphosphate (UDP)-glucose 6-dehydrogenase (UGDH), catalyzes the conversion of UDP-glucose to UDP-glucuronic acid, a key precursor in the glucuronidation pathway, which plays essential roles in the detoxification of bile acids, xenobiotics, and microbial metabolites[5].

In a recent study, published in the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Cao et al[6] identified UGDH as a prognostically unfavorable factor in HCC. Using an integrative approach that combined pan-cancer bioinformatics, immunological analyses, and experimental validation, these authors demonstrated that the overexpression of UGDH is linked to increases in tumor proliferation and immunosuppressive signatures. These findings accordingly highlight the need to broaden our understanding of UGDH, recognizing it not only as a key regulator of hepatic metabolism but also as an important player in gut–liver immune communication.

UGDH IN CANCER AND LIVER IMMUNOMETABOLISM: BEYOND DETOXIFICATION

Traditionally, UGDH has been recognized for its role in hepatic glucuronidation, a phase II metabolic process that is essential for the conversion of lipophilic compounds to excretable forms[7]. Cao et al[6] revealed that UGDH is upregulated in multiple gastrointestinal malignancies, particularly in HCC, in which its elevated expression was found to be correlated with poor overall survival and an immune microenvironment enriched in Th2 cells and depleted in cluster of differentiation 8 + cytotoxic T lymphocytes.

Functional experiments confirmed that silencing UGDH in HCC cells (e.g., Huh7) suppresses tumor proliferation and attenuates xenograft tumor growth[8], thereby providing evidence to indicate that UGDH contributes to both tumor metabolic flexibility and immune evasion, which is consistent with a broader model in which metabolic enzymes orchestrate multiple hallmarks of cancer progression. Similar conclusions have been reported in other studies investigating UGDH in the context of cancer cell survival and immune modulation[7,8].

The upregulation of UGDH in HCC tissues and hepatoma cells, as reported by Cao et al[6], may reflect a compensatory metabolic adaptation to heightened demand for glucuronidation under conditions of bile acid accumulation and microbial stress, and in turn, this metabolic reprogramming may exacerbate immune tolerance by facilitating the clearance of immunogenic ligands, thereby highlighting the role of UGDH as a functional mediator of gut–liver immune crosstalk.

THE GUT-LIVER AXIS AND GLUCURONIDATION: A TWO-WAY STREET

The liver and gut maintain a tightly regulated bidirectional relationship mediated via portal circulation[9,10]. The liver receives a constant input of gut-derived microbial metabolites, including short-chain fatty acids, secondary bile acids, and pathogen-associated molecular patterns, such as lipopolysaccharides (LPS), which necessitate effective detoxification to maintain immune tolerance and physiological homeostasis[11-13].

UGDH produces UDP-glucuronic acid, an essential substrate for conjugating bile acids and microbial products, thereby facilitating their excretion via bile[14]. Under conditions in which UGDH activity is impaired or insufficient, glucuronidation is disrupted. The ensuing accumulation of unconjugated bile acids leads to epithelial injury and an increase in intestinal permeability (Figure 1), thereby enabling microbial products, such as LPS, to undergo translocation to the liver, wherein they stimulate innate immune cells and can thus induce chronic inflammation[15-18].

Figure 1
Figure 1 Schematic illustration of how dysregulated uridine diphosphate-glucose 6-dehydrogenase disrupts gut-liver immune homeostasis. Under normal conditions, hepatic uridine diphosphate (UDP)-glucose 6-dehydrogenase (UGDH) converts UDP-glucose to UDP-glucuronic acid, which supports the glucuronidation and detoxification of bile acids and microbial metabolites. This process protects the intestinal barrier and prevents harmful microbial products from reaching the liver. However, when UGDH is downregulated or impaired, detoxification fails. Bile acids accumulate, intestinal permeability increases, and microbial products such as lipopolysaccharide translocate to the liver via the portal vein. These signals activate Kupffer cells, leading to programmed cell death ligand 1 upregulation and immune suppression, thereby promoting hepatocarcinogenesis. UDP: Uridine diphosphate; UGDH: Uridine diphosphate-glucose 6-dehydrogenase; PD-L1: Programmed cell death ligand 1.

Upon sensing elevated levels of LPS, Kupffer cells initiate an upregulated production of immunosuppressive cytokines, such as interleukin-10, and co-inhibitory ligands, such as programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), thus generating an immune-tolerant microenvironment that is conducive to tumor growth[18,19]. UGDH thus functions as a pivotal regulatory node linking metabolic detoxification with immune surveillance at the gut-liver interface.

MICROBIAL REGULATION OF HEPATIC UGDH EXPRESSION: A FEEDBACK LOOP

Emerging data is providing evidence to indicate that the hepatic expression of UGDH is responsive to gut microbial composition and metabolic activity. For example, short-chain fatty acids such as butyrate can influence histone acetylation and modulate hepatic gene transcription[20]. Similarly, secondary bile acids transmit signals via nuclear receptors (e.g., farnesoid X receptor and Takeda G-protein-coupled receptor 5) to regulate liver metabolism[21].

Alterations in the composition of the gut microbiota, driven by dietary changes, liver disease, or antibiotic exposure, can promote a corresponding shift in the composition of microbial metabolites reaching the liver[22], which in turn can lead to a downregulation of UGDH expression or enzymatic activity, thereby compromising the capacity of the liver to glucuronidate and excrete toxic compounds. The resulting accumulation of bile acids and pathogen-associated molecular patterns contributes to exacerbating epithelial injury and inflammation, and thus perpetuates a state of dysbiosis[23].

In response to these conditions, a reciprocal feedback loop is established in which the microbiota modulate UGDH, whereas UGDH activity shapes microbial selection via the detoxification of bile acids. A disruption of this balance may be one of the key factors contributing to the development of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)-associated HCC and other gut-liver axis-related cancers.

METABOLIC IMMUNE CHECKPOINTS: UGDH AS A NOVEL REGULATOR

By targeting immune checkpoint molecules, such as programmed cell death 1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4, immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer care[24-26], and, recently, metabolic checkpoints, defined as those enzymes that influence antigen presentation, cytokine secretion, and immune cell function, have garnered growing attention. It is conceivable that UGDH may represent one such checkpoint.

UGDH not only contributes to regulating the glucuronidation of bile acids and microbial ligands[6] but can also intervene in the immune microenvironment and activate immune effector cells[27,28], plausibly indirectly influencing the immune activation threshold of the liver. Impaired detoxification enhances the immunosuppressive properties of these molecules, reduces antigen presentation, and promotes regulatory T cell phenotypes[29], thereby tending to mirror the mechanisms of MASLD, in which mitochondrial DNA leakage activates the cyclic guanosine monophosphate-adenosine monophosphate synthase-stimulator of interferon genes (cGAS-STING) pathway and enhances the expression of PD-L1[30].

We hypothesize that a reduction in UGDH activity would exacerbate innate immune signaling pathways, such as cGAS-STING, and act in synergy with PD-L1 induction to enhance immune tolerance and accelerate tumor progression, thereby highlighting the role of UGDH as a key regulator of immune escape mechanisms, which play pivotal roles in metabolically driven liver cancers. Although to date there has been no evidence to indicate a direct mechanistic link between UGDH and the cGAS-STING pathway, we envisage a potential convergence in their roles based on common features in immune suppression. It is thus plausible that a suppression of UGDH-mediated detoxification may promote mitochondrial stress and microbial translocation, which are established activators of cGAS-STING signaling. Consequently, although UGDH may not directly regulate this pathway, its metabolic consequences could function synergistically in conjunction with innate immune signaling cascades that converge on PD-L1 expression and immune tolerance.

THERAPEUTIC AND DIAGNOSTIC IMPLICATIONS

The findings reported by Cao et al[6] have laid a strong foundation for further characterization of UGDH as a potential therapeutic target, and have several important clinical implications, including the following: (1) Direct pharmacological inhibition of UGDH may restrict tumor growth and potentially restore immune activation; (2) Microbiota modulation strategies (e.g., probiotics, prebiotics, and dietary interventions) could indirectly enhance hepatic UGDH activity and the efficiency of glucuronidation; (3) Therapies combining the inhibition of UGDH with immune checkpoint blockade may contribute to improving the outcomes of patients with non-viral HCC or MASLD-related tumors; and (4) Diagnostic assays quantifying UGDH activity or downstream metabolites may serve as biomarkers for tumor immunogenicity and therapeutic responses.

These potential strategies are consistent with precision medicine approaches and reinforce the importance of integrating metabolic and immune paradigms in gastrointestinal oncology.

CONCLUSION

Cao et al[6] not only identified UGDH as a driver of HCC but also opened up new avenues for our understanding of its role in immune modulation. By bridging hepatic metabolism and intestinal homeostasis, UGDH has emerged as a metabolic immune checkpoint that plays an essential role in regulating the gut-liver axis. We propose that dysregulated UGDH activity contributes to bile acid accumulation, intestinal barrier dysfunction, microbial translocation, and hepatic immunosuppression. This multifaceted role places UGDH at the crossroads between metabolism and immunity, thereby offering opportunities for novel therapeutic interventions. Further research is warranted to validate these mechanisms and assess the translational feasibility of targeting UGDH in gastrointestinal cancers. Nevertheless, although the inhibition of UGDH may offer therapeutic benefits in the context of cancer, its physiological role in maintaining hepatic detoxification must be carefully considered. Accordingly, future strategies involving any modification of UGDH activity may require selective or tumor-specific targeting to avoid adverse metabolic consequences.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Invited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Oncology

Country of origin: China

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade A, Grade B, Grade B, Grade C

Novelty: Grade A, Grade A, Grade B, Grade C

Creativity or Innovation: Grade A, Grade B, Grade B, Grade C

Scientific Significance: Grade A, Grade B, Grade B, Grade C

P-Reviewer: Jain BP, PhD, Assistant Professor, India; Xie YF, PhD, Professor, China; Zao XB, MD, Professor, China S-Editor: Fan M L-Editor: A P-Editor: Zhao S

References
1.  Hu B, Lin JZ, Yang XB, Sang XT. Aberrant lipid metabolism in hepatocellular carcinoma cells as well as immune microenvironment: A review. Cell Prolif. 2020;53:e12772.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 31]  [Cited by in RCA: 103]  [Article Influence: 20.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Armandi A, Rosso C, Caviglia GP, Bugianesi E. An updated overview on hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with Metabolic dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: Trends, pathophysiology and risk-based surveillance. Metabolism. 2025;162:156080.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in RCA: 10]  [Article Influence: 10.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Kodama T, Takehara T. Molecular Genealogy of Metabolic-associated Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Semin Liver Dis. 2024;44:147-158.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Chen M, Zhang C, Liu W, Du X, Liu X, Xing B. Long noncoding RNA LINC01234 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression through orchestrating aspartate metabolic reprogramming. Mol Ther. 2022;30:2354-2369.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in RCA: 53]  [Article Influence: 17.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Zimmer BM, Barycki JJ, Simpson MA. Integration of Sugar Metabolism and Proteoglycan Synthesis by UDP-glucose Dehydrogenase. J Histochem Cytochem. 2021;69:13-23.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in RCA: 29]  [Article Influence: 5.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Cao X, Zheng SH, Shen JM, Li SZ, Hou L, Zhang JX, Li XK, Du HB, Zhang LP, Ye YA, Zao XB. Pan-cancer analysis of UDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenase in human tumors and its function in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2025;17:105981.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Zhang T, Zhang N, Xing J, Zhang S, Chen Y, Xu D, Gu J. UDP-glucuronate metabolism controls RIPK1-driven liver damage in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Nat Commun. 2023;14:2715.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 13]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Guo B, Xu X, Shao M, Yang X, He G, Qi K, Gu J, Wang L. UDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenase lessens sorafenib sensitivity via modulating unfolded protein response. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2022;613:207-213.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 8]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Seo YS, Shah VH. The role of gut-liver axis in the pathogenesis of liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2012;18:337-346.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 91]  [Cited by in RCA: 110]  [Article Influence: 8.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Arab JP, Martin-Mateos RM, Shah VH. Gut-liver axis, cirrhosis and portal hypertension: the chicken and the egg. Hepatol Int. 2018;12:24-33.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 91]  [Cited by in RCA: 163]  [Article Influence: 20.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Macpherson AJ, Heikenwalder M, Ganal-Vonarburg SC. The Liver at the Nexus of Host-Microbial Interactions. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;20:561-571.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 61]  [Cited by in RCA: 84]  [Article Influence: 10.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Hsu CL, Schnabl B. The gut-liver axis and gut microbiota in health and liver disease. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2023;21:719-733.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 102]  [Cited by in RCA: 270]  [Article Influence: 135.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Jiang N, Xiao Y, Yuan K, Wang Z. Effect of intestinal microbiota on liver disease and its related future prospection: From the perspective of intestinal barrier damage and microbial metabolites. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;38:1056-1071.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Chen J, Yu Y, Gao J, Yang S. UDP-glucose Dehydrogenase: The First-step Oxidation Is an NAD(+)-dependent Bimolecular Nucleophilic Substitution Reaction (S(N)2). Int J Biol Sci. 2019;15:341-350.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in RCA: 10]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Gupta B, Liu Y, Chopyk DM, Rai RP, Desai C, Kumar P, Farris AB, Nusrat A, Parkos CA, Anania FA, Raeman R. Western diet-induced increase in colonic bile acids compromises epithelial barrier in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. FASEB J. 2020;34:7089-7102.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in RCA: 33]  [Article Influence: 6.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Li DK, Chaudhari SN, Lee Y, Sojoodi M, Adhikari AA, Zukerberg L, Shroff S, Barrett SC, Tanabe K, Chung RT, Devlin AS. Inhibition of microbial deconjugation of micellar bile acids protects against intestinal permeability and liver injury. Sci Adv. 2022;8:eabo2794.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in RCA: 27]  [Article Influence: 9.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Calzadilla N, Comiskey SM, Dudeja PK, Saksena S, Gill RK, Alrefai WA. Bile acids as inflammatory mediators and modulators of intestinal permeability. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1021924.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in RCA: 56]  [Article Influence: 18.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Bein A, Zilbershtein A, Golosovsky M, Davidov D, Schwartz B. LPS Induces Hyper-Permeability of Intestinal Epithelial Cells. J Cell Physiol. 2017;232:381-390.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 69]  [Cited by in RCA: 109]  [Article Influence: 12.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Yin H, Pu N, Chen Q, Zhang J, Zhao G, Xu X, Wang D, Kuang T, Jin D, Lou W, Wu W. Gut-derived lipopolysaccharide remodels tumoral microenvironment and synergizes with PD-L1 checkpoint blockade via TLR4/MyD88/AKT/NF-κB pathway in pancreatic cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12:1033.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in RCA: 57]  [Article Influence: 14.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Chriett S, Dąbek A, Wojtala M, Vidal H, Balcerczyk A, Pirola L. Prominent action of butyrate over β-hydroxybutyrate as histone deacetylase inhibitor, transcriptional modulator and anti-inflammatory molecule. Sci Rep. 2019;9:742.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 90]  [Cited by in RCA: 178]  [Article Influence: 29.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Chiang JYL. Bile acid metabolism and signaling in liver disease and therapy. Liver Res. 2017;1:3-9.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 143]  [Cited by in RCA: 209]  [Article Influence: 26.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Ding Y, Yanagi K, Cheng C, Alaniz RC, Lee K, Jayaraman A. Interactions between gut microbiota and non-alcoholic liver disease: The role of microbiota-derived metabolites. Pharmacol Res. 2019;141:521-529.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 80]  [Cited by in RCA: 76]  [Article Influence: 12.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Duboc H, Rajca S, Rainteau D, Benarous D, Maubert MA, Quervain E, Thomas G, Barbu V, Humbert L, Despras G, Bridonneau C, Dumetz F, Grill JP, Masliah J, Beaugerie L, Cosnes J, Chazouillères O, Poupon R, Wolf C, Mallet JM, Langella P, Trugnan G, Sokol H, Seksik P. Connecting dysbiosis, bile-acid dysmetabolism and gut inflammation in inflammatory bowel diseases. Gut. 2013;62:531-539.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 513]  [Cited by in RCA: 670]  [Article Influence: 55.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Farkona S, Diamandis EP, Blasutig IM. Cancer immunotherapy: the beginning of the end of cancer? BMC Med. 2016;14:73.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 732]  [Cited by in RCA: 839]  [Article Influence: 93.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Dobosz P, Dzieciątkowski T. The Intriguing History of Cancer Immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2965.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 255]  [Cited by in RCA: 273]  [Article Influence: 45.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Koury J, Lucero M, Cato C, Chang L, Geiger J, Henry D, Hernandez J, Hung F, Kaur P, Teskey G, Tran A. Immunotherapies: Exploiting the Immune System for Cancer Treatment. J Immunol Res. 2018;2018:9585614.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 56]  [Cited by in RCA: 96]  [Article Influence: 13.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Zhan D, Yalcin F, Ma D, Fu Y, Wei S, Lal B, Li Y, Dzaye O, Laterra J, Ying M, Lopez-Bertoni H, Xia S. Targeting UDP-α-d-glucose 6-dehydrogenase alters the CNS tumor immune microenvironment and inhibits glioblastoma growth. Genes Dis. 2022;9:717-730.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in RCA: 14]  [Article Influence: 4.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Wang M, Ge Z, Fan X, Zhao H, Shi Z, Zhang J, Jin L, Li Y, Wang J, Zao X, Yang Y. Downregulation of UDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenase predicts adverse outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer and promotes tumorigenesis. Sci Rep. 2025;15:21522.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Kremer KN, Khammash HA, Miranda AM, Rutt LN, Twardy SM, Anton PE, Campbell ML, Garza-Ortiz C, Orlicky DJ, Pelanda R, McCullough RL, Torres RM. Liver sinusoidal endothelial cells regulate the balance between hepatic immunosuppression and immunosurveillance. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1497788.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Xu D, Tian Y, Xia Q, Ke B. The cGAS-STING Pathway: Novel Perspectives in Liver Diseases. Front Immunol. 2021;12:682736.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 21]  [Cited by in RCA: 40]  [Article Influence: 10.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]