BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jul 15, 2026; 18(7): 120437
Published online Jul 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.120437
Figure 1
Figure 1 Overall study design. The study consisted of four phases: (1) Data collection from development cohort (n = 680) and independent test cohort (n = 170); (2) Image preprocessing including tumor annotation and quality assessment; (3) Construction of the dual-path context-aware fusion network for T and N staging; and (4) Model evaluation using cross-validation and independent test set. FPN: Feature pyramid networks; AUC: Area under the curve; AI: Artificial intelligence.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Receiver operating characteristic curves of the independent test set. A: T-staging receiver operating characteristic curve; B: N-staging receiver operating characteristic curve. AUC: Area under the curve.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Decision curve analysis graphs. A: T-staging decision curve analysis graph; B: N-staging decision curve analysis graph.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Image feature analysis of typical cases. A: A correctly classified T1 tumor; B: A correctly classified T2 tumor; C: A misclassified case (T3 by pathology vs T2 by the model); D: A misclassified case (N2 by pathology vs N0 by the model).


Write to the Help Desk