Published online May 15, 2022. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i5.1037
Peer-review started: December 20, 2021
First decision: February 21, 2022
Revised: April 8, 2022
Accepted: April 24, 2022
Article in press: April 24, 2022
Published online: May 15, 2022
Processing time: 140 Days and 23 Hours
Liver transplantation (LT) has become a standard of care in patients with end-stage liver disease. Biliary strictures after LT can be either anastomotic or non-anastomotic based on the morphology and location of stenosis observed during imaging procedures. The first-line approach to resolving biliary strictures involves endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), with stenosis dilatation and placement of multiple plastic stents, and fully covered self-expandable metallic stents.
Biliary strictures after LT remain clinically arduous and challenging situations, and ERCP has been considered as the gold standard for the management of biliary strictures after LT. Nevertheless, in the treatment of biliary strictures after LT with ERCP, many studies show that there is a large variation in diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic success rate. Digital single-operator peroral cholangioscopy (DSOC) is considered a valuable diagnostic modality for indeterminate biliary strictures.
This study aimed to evaluate DSOC in addition to ERCP for management of biliary strictures after LT.
Total 19 patients with duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction who underwent ERCP for suspected biliary complications were consecutively enrolled in this observational study. After evaluating bile ducts using fluoroscopy, cholangioscopy using a modern digital single-operator cholangioscopy system was performed during the same procedure with patients under conscious sedation. Biliary strictures after LT were classified according to the manifestations of choledochoscopic strictures and the manifestations of transplanted hepatobiliary ducts.
Twenty-one biliary strictures were found in a total of 19 patients, among which anastomotic strictures were evident in 18 (94.7%) patients, while non-anastomotic strictures in 2 (10.5%), and space-occupying lesions in 1 (5.3%). Stones were found in 11 (57.9%) and loose sutures in 8 (42.1%). A benefit of cholangioscopy was seen in 15 (78.9%) patients. It was instrumental in identifying biliary stone and/or loose sutures in 9 patients in whom ERCP failed. It also provided a direct vision for laser lithotripsy.
The present study examined the benefit of complementary DSOC. DSOC can provide important diagnostic information, helping plan and perform interventional procedures in LT-related biliary strictures. Our results are encouraging and demonstrate strong evidence for a diagnostic and therapeutic advantage of additional cholangioscopy for the management of biliary disorders following liver transplantation.
This study was retrospective, and prospective multicenter trials should be performed. Patients with living donor LT should also be investigated.