Published online Jul 15, 2019. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i7.538
Peer-review started: January 28, 2019
First decision: April 15, 2019
Revised: May 1, 2019
Accepted: May 28, 2019
Article in press: May 29, 2019
Published online: July 15, 2019
Processing time: 170 Days and 21 Hours
Tumor recurrence is common for patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma after radical resection surgery. Over the past few years, intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy has been gradually incorporated into the treatment for rectal carcinoma patients to decrease the recurrence rate and showed improved clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, the effects of intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy on postoperative complications have rarely been explored. We conducted this research to determine the effects of intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy on the incidence of anastomotic leakage (AL), which would be meaningful to promote our knowledge about the safety and feasibility of this emerging therapy modality.
Our study explored the safety of intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients receiving the anterior resection of rectal carcinoma. This is significant for surgeons to weigh the benefits and risks of this treatment technique.
Our research aimed to evaluate the role of intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the occurrence of AL. Meanwhile, the prognosis of patients receiving this therapy was also analyzed.
We performed a retrospective cohort study and patients were divided into a chemotherapy group and a control group. Important demographic variables and confounding factors were collected and analyzed through univariate analysis, stratification analysis, and multivariate analysis to control confounding bias. The oncological outcomes of the two groups were compared through the Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test.
We found that intraoperative intrapertitoneal chemotherapy increased the incidence of AL in patients receiving the anterior resection of rectal carcinoma, but this treatment also contributed to improved disease-free survival rate. This finding can help surgeons to weigh the benefits and risks of this emerging treatment method. Moreover, the mechanisms of intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy leading to AL need to be further investigated in more basic studies. The effects of different types of chemotherapeautic agents on AL can also be explored.
Intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy can improve the prognosis of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, but it also increases the risks of AL in patients receiving anterior resection of rectal carcinoma. Patients who have other risks of postoperative AL may not be suitable to receive this therapy.
Surgeons need to think deeply about the indications and contraindications of intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy so that better clinical outcomes can be achieved in patients with rectal carcinoma. Moreover, our research is a retrospective study, and biases from data collection and analysis may exist. More prospective randomized controlled trials need to be conducted to explore the safety and feasibility of intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy.