Published online Aug 15, 2016. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v8.i8.623
Peer-review started: January 9, 2016
First decision: February 26, 2016
Revised: April 6, 2016
Accepted: May 17, 2016
Article in press: May 27, 2016
Published online: August 15, 2016
Processing time: 214 Days and 5.3 Hours
AIM: To investigate a link between lymph node yield and systemic inflammatory response in colon cancer.
METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was interrogated. All patients undergoing curative colonic resection were included. Neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and albumin were used as markers of SIR. In keeping with previously studies, NLR ≥ 4, albumin < 35 was used as cut off points for SIR. Statistical analysis was performed using 2 sample t-test and χ2 tests where appropriate.
RESULTS: Three hundred and two patients were included for analysis. One hundred and ninety-five patients had NLR < 4 and 107 had NLR ≥ 4. There was no difference in age or sex between groups. Patients with NLR of ≥ 4 had lower mean lymph node yields than patients with NLR < 4 [17.6 ± 7.1 vs 19.2 ± 7.9 (P = 0.036)]. More patients with an elevated NLR had node positive disease and an increased lymph node ratio (≥ 0.25, P = 0.044).
CONCLUSION: Prognosis in colon cancer is intimately linked to the patient’s immune response. Assuming standardised surgical technique and sub specialty pathology, lymph node count is reduced when systemic inflammatory response is activated.
Core tip: A fascinating field of research is the relationship between systemic inflammatory response and loco-regional inflammatory response in colorectal cancer. This manuscript examines this relationship in a large cohort of patients from a tertiary referral centre. We measured systemic response by assessing serum markers at diagnosis and we measured local response by looking at pathological lymph node counts in the post operative surgical specimen. This is the first report to show that patients with evidence of an activated systemic inflammatory response at diagnosis have a reduced nodal harvest at time of surgery. This finding sheds light on the complex interaction between cancer and the patient. This host-tumour response forms the basis for the most advanced cancer research today.