Sillah K, Williams LR, Laasch HU, Saleem A, Watkins G, Pritchard SA, Price PM, West CM, Welch IM. Computed tomography overestimation of esophageal tumor length: Implications for radiotherapy planning. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2010; 2(4): 197-204 [PMID: 21160598 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v2.i4.197]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Catharine M West, Professor, School of Cancer & Enabling Sciences, University of Manchester, Christie Hospital, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom. catharine.west@manchester.ac.uk
Article-Type of This Article
Brief Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Share the Article
Sillah K, Williams LR, Laasch HU, Saleem A, Watkins G, Pritchard SA, Price PM, West CM, Welch IM. Computed tomography overestimation of esophageal tumor length: Implications for radiotherapy planning. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2010; 2(4): 197-204 [PMID: 21160598 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v2.i4.197]
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Apr 15, 2010; 2(4): 197-204 Published online Apr 15, 2010. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v2.i4.197
Computed tomography overestimation of esophageal tumor length: Implications for radiotherapy planning
Karim Sillah, Luke R Williams, Hans-Ulrich Laasch, Azeem Saleem, Gillian Watkins, Susan A Pritchard, Patricia M Price, Catharine M West, Ian M Welch
Karim Sillah, Ian M Welch, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Southmoor Road, Manchester M23 9LT, United Kingdom
Karim Sillah, Azeem Saleem, Gillian Watkins, Patricia M Price, Catharine M West, School of Cancer & Enabling Sciences, University of Manchester, Christie Hospital, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom
Luke R Williams, Department of Radiology, University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Southmoor Road, Manchester M23 9LT, United Kingdom
Hans-Ulrich Laasch, Department of Radiology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom
Susan A Pritchard, Department of Histopathology, University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Southmoor Road, Manchester M23 9LT, United Kingdom
Author contributions: Welch IM, West CM, Saleem A and Price PM conceived the idea; Sillah K, Williams LR, Pritchard SA and Watkins G collected the data; Williams LR and Laasch HU scored the CTs; Sillah K drafted the initial manuscript and all the co-authors contributed to subsequent drafts.
Supported by The local departmental research fund
Correspondence to: Catharine M West, Professor, School of Cancer & Enabling Sciences, University of Manchester, Christie Hospital, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom. catharine.west@manchester.ac.uk
Telephone: +44-161-4468275 Fax: +44-161-4468111
Received: May 5, 2009 Revised: February 22, 2010 Accepted: March 1, 2010 Published online: April 15, 2010
Abstract
AIM: To assess the relationship between preoperative computed tomography (CT) and postoperative pathological measurements of esophageal tumor length and the prognostic significance of CT tumor length data.
METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out in 56 patients who underwent curative esophagogastrectomy. Tumor lengths were measured on the immediate preoperative CT and on the post-operative resection specimens. Inter- and intra-observer variations in CT measurements were assessed. Survival data were collected.
RESULTS: There was a weak correlation between CT and pathological tumor length (r = 0.30, P = 0.025). CT lengths were longer than pathological lengths in 68% (38/56) of patients with a mean difference of 1.67 cm (95% CI: 1.18-2.97). The mean difference in measurements by two radiologists was 0.39 cm (95% CI: -0.59-1.44). The mean difference between repeat CT measured tumor length (intra-observer variation) were 0.04 cm (95% CI: -0.59-0.66) and 0.47 cm (95% CI: -0.53-1.47). When stratified, patients not receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed a strong correlation between CT and pathological tumor length (r = 0.69, P = 0.0014, n = 37) than patients that did (r = 0.13, P = 0.43, n = 19). Median survival with CT tumor length > 5.6 cm was poorer than with smaller tumors, but the difference was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: Esophageal tumor length assessed using CT does not reflect pathological tumor extent and should not be the only modality used for management decisions, particularly for planning radiotherapy.
