Published online Dec 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.125845
Revised: August 13, 2026
Accepted: October 13, 2026
Published online: December 15, 2026
Processing time: 111 Days and 13.6 Hours
The rising incidence and improved survival of colorectal cancer (CRC) in China have highlighted return to work (RTW) challenges. However, the heterogeneity of work ability among survivors remains underexplored, prompting the use of latent profile analysis to identify distinct RTW ability classes and their associated factors for tailored rehabilitation.
To examine the possible categories and factors associated with CRC survivors’ ability to regain employment and offer theoretical support for enhancing their employment capability.
This cross-sectional study recruited 261 CRC survivors from a tertiary hospital in Zhejiang Province via convenience sampling. Participants completed four questi
The potential profile analysis results showed that the ability of CRC survivors to RTW can be divided into three categories: (1) High work ability (39.08%); (2) Moderate work ability (49.04%); and (3) Low work ability (11.88%). The results of multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the total symptom score, symptom distress, and social impact scale total score were correlated with the ability of CRC survivors to RTW (P < 0.05).
This study revealed three potential patterns of returning to work among CRC survivors, challenging the current homogeneous assumption regarding postsurgery care. Linking symptom burden and stigma to different adaptation patterns provides a typological basis for developing personalized rehabilitation plans based on psychological, social, and functional heterogeneity beyond the disease stage. However, the universality of these findings is limited by the single-center convenience sampling and cross-sectional design. Moreover, owing to the relatively small sample size, more samples are needed to verify the research conclusions.
Core Tip: Three latent work-ability classes were identified among colorectal cancer survivors. Symptom burden and stigma were key associated factors, highlighting the need for individualized rehabilitation.