BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Opinion Review
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Nov 15, 2026; 18(11): 120353
Published online Nov 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.120353
Dynamic programmed death-ligand 1 and multimodal biomarkers in gastric cancer immunotherapy
Abdellatif Bouayad
Abdellatif Bouayad, Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Oujda, Mohammed First University, Oujda 4867, Oriental Region, Morocco
Author contributions: Bouayad A wrote and designed the manuscript.
AI contribution statement: We only used ChatGPT and Grammarly for language polishing in the response to reviewers. All scientific content, ideas, analyses, interpretations, and conclusions are original work by the author. No AI was used for data analysis, study design, or result interpretation. Figures and tables are original and created by the author.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Corresponding author: Abdellatif Bouayad, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Oujda, Mohammed First University, Hay Al Hikma, P.O. Box 4867, Oujda 4867, Oriental Region, Morocco. a.bouayad@ump.ac.ma
Received: February 24, 2026
Revised: March 31, 2026
Accepted: May 25, 2026
Published online: November 15, 2026
Processing time: 242 Days and 19.6 Hours
Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and programmed death-1 (PD-1) are promising therapies for advanced gastric cancer (GC). However, challenges remain in identifying the best biomarkers to guide anti-PD-L1/PD-1 therapy. There are two competing paradigms for selecting immunotherapy biomarkers in clinical practice. One favors static biomarkers, such as Epstein-Barr virus positivity, microsatellite instability status, and the PD-L1 combined positive score, due to their track record in clinical trials. The other emerging view prefers dynamic tumor biomarkers, such as circulating tumor DNA, exosomal PD-L1, and immune cell profiling, to better reveal therapy-induced immune changes. This article discusses three main questions for real-time assessment of anti-PD-L1/PD-1 therapy in advanced GC: (1) What complementary approaches can overcome static PD-L1 assessment limitations; (2) How dynamic tumor biomarkers could be used in clinical practice to improve monitoring and patient selection; and (3) How multimodal artificial intelligence could support personalized immunotherapy. These strategies may improve patient selection and enhance the clinical impact of immunotherapy in advanced GC.

Keywords: Gastric cancer; Programmed death-ligand 1 expression; Tumor biomarkers; Artificial intelligence; Immune checkpoint inhibitors

Core Tip: Emerging non-invasive, real-time biomarkers such as serial exosomal programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), circulating tumor DNA, and circulating immune cells may help overcome the limitations of static PD-L1 assessment, thereby improving the efficacy of anti-programmed death-1/PD-L1 therapy in advanced gastric cancer. Validation of rapid, cost-effective, and point-of-care dynamic tumor biomarkers is essential before their integration into routine clinical practice. Moreover, integrating histopathological and radiological findings with standard tumor biomarker data through artificial intelligence offers the potential to overcome the main limitations of circulating tumor DNA next-generation sequencing and PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assessment.

Write to the Help Desk