Published online May 15, 2024. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i5.2159
Peer-review started: November 15, 2023
First decision: January 9, 2024
Revised: February 6, 2024
Accepted: March 12, 2024
Article in press: March 12, 2024
Published online: May 15, 2024
Processing time: 175 Days and 23.9 Hours
The research findings suggest that the prognosis of children with Wilms tumor (WT) is affected by various factors. Some scholars have indicated that loss of heterozygosity (LOH) on chromosome 16q is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with WT.
To further elucidate this relationship, we conducted a meta-analysis.
This meta-analysis was registered in INPLASY (INPLASY2023100060). We systematically searched databases including Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Google Scholar up to May 31, 2020, for randomized trials reporting any intrapartum fetal surveillance approach. The meta-analysis was performed within a frequentist framework, and the quality and network inconsistency of trials were assessed. Odds ratios and 95%CIs were calculated to report the relationship between event-free survival and 16q LOH in patients with WT.
Eleven cohort studies were included in this meta-analysis to estimate the relationship between event-free survival and 16q LOH in patients with WT (I2 = 25%, P < 0.001). As expected, 16q LOH can serve as an effective predictor of event-free survival in patients with WT (risk ratio = 1.95, 95%CI: 1.52–2.49, P < 0.001).
In pediatric patients with WT, there exists a partial correlation between 16q LOH and an unfavorable treatment prognosis. Clinical detection of 16q chromosome LOH warrants increased attention to the patient’s prognosis.
Core Tip: This study explores the prognostic significance of 16q loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in the treatment of patients with Wilms tumor (WT) in recent years. Utilizing a meta-analysis, the overall predictive value of 16q LOH in patients with WT is assessed. The findings indicate that 16q LOH is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with WT. Following clinical treatment, it is crucial to pay increased attention to patients’ prognostic value while adjusting their survival expectations.
