Published online Feb 15, 2022. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i2.543
Peer-review started: June 23, 2021
First decision: July 29, 2021
Revised: July 31, 2021
Accepted: January 25, 2022
Article in press: January 25, 2022
Published online: February 15, 2022
Processing time: 231 Days and 21 Hours
Endoscopic ectomy of large nonpedunculated colorectal lesions (≥ 20 mm) might cause significant adverse incidents, such as delayed perforation and delayed bleeding, despite the closure of mucosal lesions with clips. The conventional utilization of prophylactic clipping has not decreased the risk of postprocedural delayed adverse events, and additional outcomes and cost-effectiveness research is needed for patients with proximal lesions ≥ 20 mm, in whom prophylactic clipping might be useful. Coverage of the wound after endoscopic excision offers shield protection against delayed concomitant diseases.
Core Tip: The conventional application of prophylactic clipping has not diminished overall risk of postprocedural delayed adverse events, and additional efficacy and cost-effectiveness studies are needed in patients with large (20 mm) non-pedunculated colorectal lesions, in whom prophylactic clipping may be useful. The preventive process significantly decreases the risk of delayed adverse events (delayed bleeding and delayed perforation) by more than 80%.
