Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Feb 10, 2016; 8(3): 128-142
Published online Feb 10, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i3.128
Published online Feb 10, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i3.128
Table 1 Diagnostic serum markers for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma
Diagnostic markers | Countries | CCA or PDACpatients, n | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | |
Pancreatic cancer | miRNA-10b, -30c, -106b, -155, and -212[120] | United States | 77 | 73-100 | 83-100 |
Index 1: (miR-145, miR-150, miR-223, miR-636) | Denmark | 409 | Index 1: 77 Index 2: 80 | Index 1: 66 Index 2: 82 | |
Index 2: (miR-26b, miR-34a, miR-122, miR-126, miR-145, miR-150, miR-223, miR-505, miR-636, miR-885.5p)[121] | |||||
miR-21, miR-210, miR-155, and miR-196[122] | United States | 49 | 64 | 89 | |
CCA | CYFRA 21-1[18,24,30] | United Kingdom, Italy | 30 | 17-76 | 79-95 |
MMP-7[24,123,124] | Thailand, Italy | 120 | 53-78 | 72.5-92 | |
Combo | Italy | 24 | 92 | 96 | |
(CEA, CA 19-9, MMP-7, CYFRA 21-1)[24] | |||||
Combo | United Kingdom | 6 | 45 | 96 | |
(CYFRA 21-1, CA 19-9)[30] | |||||
IL-6[35,125-127] | United States, Thailand | 207 | 71.1-100 | 90-92 | |
SSP411[37] | China | 35 | 90 | 83.3 | |
miR-21[128] | United States | 23 | 95 | 100 | |
miR-150[129] | China | 15 | 80.6 | 58.1 | |
1miR-192[130] | Japan | 51 | 74 | 72 | |
MUC5AC[131,132] | Thailand | 348 | 62.6-71 | 90-96.9 | |
Combo | China | 30 | 90 | 90 | |
(AFP, CEA, CA 19-9, CA 125)[133] |
Table 2 Tissue-based diagnostic biomarkers for cholangiocarcinoma
Diagnostic marker | Countries | Total patients, n | CCA patients, n | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | |
PSC-associated strictures | Brush Cytology[21,76,134-140] | United States, The Netherlands, Sweden, Norway | 828 | 138 | 7-73 | 89-100 |
FISH polysomy[21,73,136,137,140] | United States | 387 | 89 | 22-50 | 88-100 | |
FISH polysomy or trisomy[21,73,136,140] | United States | 373 | 75 | 60-88 | 57-87 | |
Kras[141,142] | Norway, United States | 180 | 74 | 29-47 | 96-100 | |
p53[142] | Norway | 48 | 33 | 31 | 100 | |
Cytology + CA19-9[135] | United States | 333 | 44 | 87.5 | 97.3 | |
Cytology + DNA aneuploidy + CA19-9 + CEA[138] | Sweden | 20 | 7 | 88-100 | 80-85 | |
Cytology + p53 + KRAS[76] | The Netherlands | 23 | 10 | 100 | 79 | |
FISH + KRAS[141] | United States | 14 | 14 | 50-68 | 96 | |
Indeterminate strictures | Brush Cytology[75,78,79,136,140,143-150] | United States, Germany, France, Italy | 640 | 199 | 5.8-80 | 92-100 |
FISH Polysomy[75,78,79,136,137,140] | United States, Italy | 386 | 165 | 31-80 | 97-100.0 | |
FISH Polysomy or trisomy[75,136,140] | United States | 147 | 88 | 49-64 | 79.6-100 | |
Biopsy[144,145,147,150-153] | United States, Japan, France | 347 | 65 | 30-88 | 97-100 | |
FNA[145,154] | United States | 133 | 30 | 25-61.6 | 100.0 | |
Cytology + biopsy[144,150] | France, Austria | 258 | 28 | 63-86 | 97-100 | |
Cytology + FNA + biopsy[145] | United States | 133 | 30 | 47-52 | 100 | |
Cytology + KRAS[155] | Belgium | 142 | 12 | 55 | 100 |
Table 3 Prognostic markers in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma
Marker | Country | Total patients,n | Marker positive PDAC | Type of dysregulation | Prognostic value, OS months | HR or P value for OS | |
Pancreatic cancer | SPARC | United States[81] | 299 | 200 | Up-regulated | +SPARC: 15 -SPARC: 30 | 1.89 |
Germany[83] | 58 | 58 | Up-regulated | +SPARC: 7.6 -SPARC: 10.2 | 2.23 | ||
Germany[84] | 160 | 95 | Up-regulated | +SPARC: 17.9 -SPARC: 30.2 | P = 0.006 | ||
Japan[85] | 104 | 104 | Up-regulated | Decreased survival | 2.92 | ||
Sweden[82] | 88 | 68 | Up-regulated | +SPARC: 11.5 -SPARC: 25.3 | 2.12 | ||
Marker | Country | Total Patients, n | CCA patients, n | Type of dysregulation | Prognostic value | HR (95%CI) or P value for OS | |
CCA | 1miR-192[130] | Japan | 83 | 51 | Up-regulated | Increased LN mets; shorter survival | 2.076 (1.004-4.291) P < 0.05 mets |
miR-675-5p[88] | China | 72 | 63 | Up-regulated | Shorter survival | 2.562 (1.295-4.929) | |
miR-652-3p, miR-338-3p[88] | China | 72 | 63 | Down-regulated | Increased survival | 0.477 (0.247-0.922); 0.498 (0.257-0.966) | |
miR-151-3p and miR-126[156] | United States | 32 | 32 | Up-regulated and down-regulated, respectively | Increased survival | 0.201 (0.043-0.928) | |
1miR-21[46] | Thailand, China | 41 | 32 | Up-regulated | Increased LN mets; shorter survival | P < 0.05 OS P = 0.037 mets | |
miR-214[157] | China | 14 | 14 | Down-regulated | Increased mets | P < 0.05 mets | |
miR-373[90] | China | 48 | 48 | Down-regulated | Shorter survival | P < 0.05 OS | |
Group 1: miR-21, miR-31, miR-223 Group 2: miR-122, miR-145, miR- 146a, miR-200c, miR-221, and miR-222[44] | Greece | 179 | 21 | Group 1: Up-regulated Group 2: Down-regulated | None | - | |
CYFRA 21-1[18,30] | United Kingdom, Japan | 195 | 137 | Up-regulated | Shorter survival | P = 0.001[30] P < 0.01[18] | |
EGFR[93,94] | Japan | 373 | 338 | Up-regulated | Shorter survival | 5.655 (2.72–11.74)[93] 2.67 (1.52-4.69)[94] |
Table 4 Theranostic markers in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma
Marker (drug) | Countries | Patients with + marker | Staining | Median survival (mo) | HR | |
Pancreatic cancer | SPARC[2] (nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine) | United States | 67 | 36 | +SPARC: 17.8 -SPARC: 8.1 | P = 0.0431 |
hENT1 (Gemncitabine) | Canada[96] | 21 | Low hENT1: 12 | Low: 4 | 1 | |
High hENT1: 9 | High: 13 | |||||
Italy[158] | 83 | Low hENT1: 27 | Low: 8.5 | 4.21 | ||
Inter: 28 | Inter:15.7 | |||||
High hENT1: 26 | High: 25.7 | |||||
United States[97] | 91 | Low hENT1: 39 | 2 | 0.51 | ||
High hENT1: 34 | ||||||
Belgium[98] | 45 | Low hENT1: 26 | Low: 13.3 | 4.31 (HR for death) | ||
High hENT1: 19 | High: 18.7 | P = 0.0001 (OS) | ||||
Japan[159] | 40 | Low hENT1: 26 | Low: 8 | P = 0.011 (OS) | ||
High hENT1: 14 | High:25 | |||||
Japan[160] | 55 | Low hENT1: 16 | Low: 11.8 | 3.15 (OS) | ||
High hENT1: 39 | High: 24.9 | |||||
Belgium | 243 | Low hENT1: 142 | 2 | 0.34 | ||
France[86] | High hENT1: 92 | |||||
Worldwide multicenter[99] | 177 | Low hENT1: 118 | Low: 6.1 | 1.147 | ||
High hENT1: 59 | High: 5.2 | |||||
England[161] | 176 | Low hENT1: 77 | Low: 17.1 | 0.6 | ||
High hENT1: 99 | High: 26.2 | |||||
Marker | Countries | CCA patients | % mutated | Type of mutation | Potential theranostic value | |
CCA | EGFR[94,105,109,112] | United States, South Korea, Japan, Italy | 400 | 1-81 | G719S kinase activation | EGFR inhibitors |
VEGF[108,162] | South Korea | 272 | 41.7-56.8 | Up-regulation | Anti-VEGF therapies | |
Kras[109,111,142,163-166] | United States, Germany, China, Norway, Japan | 197 | 7.4-45 | Substitution | U0126 (MEK inhibitor) | |
BRAF[109,110,164,167] | United States, Germany, China | 222 | 0-22 | Activating missense | BRAF inhibitors | |
ErbB2 (HER2/neu)[94,112] | South Korea, Italy | 284 | 4-5.1 | Up-regulation | Anti-ErbB2 therapies | |
IDH1/2[109,114,115,168] | United States | 576 | 10-22.31 | Gain of function | α-KG-mimics reverse methylation | |
miR-21, miR-200b[40]; miR-29b, miR-205, miR-221[117] | United States, Japan | 1 | 1 | Up-regulated | Increased sensitivity to gemcitabine | |
miR-494[92] | United States | 43 | 1 | Down-regulated | Up-regulation decreases tumor growth | |
Panel: CDO1, DCLK1, ZSCAN18 and SFRP1[169] | Norway | 39 | 87 | Promoter methylation | Anti-methylation therapy | |
Panel: CDO1, CNRIP1, SEPT9, and VIM[170] | 30 | 85 | ||||
SFRP1[169,171-173] | Norway, United Kingdom, South Korea, Thailand | 255 | 59-83.6 | Promoter methylation | Tumor suppression with gene therapy (RNAi) |
- Citation: Viterbo D, Gausman V, Gonda T. Diagnostic and therapeutic biomarkers in pancreaticobiliary malignancy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 8(3): 128-142
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v8/i3/128.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v8.i3.128